한중(韓中) 양국 문화 간 프레임 차이를 감안한 번역가의 개입 양상 ― 소설 속 비유적 요소를 중심으로
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this study, a frame was defined as ‘a common cognitive structure among members in which they recognize and conceptualize certain conditions or situations in their daily lives’. Considering that a frame associated with figurative expressions might differ in each cultural background, the study focused on how translators filled the cultural frame gap centering on Chinese translation editions of Korean novels. In particular, conventional figurative expressions that are used as formulated patterns in a society condense a cultural uniqueness of a society as well as the frames and cognitive structures of the language users for certain situations. Thus, it is very often that a same meaning triggers different figurative frames depending on each culture. Such difference should be certainly reflected in translation processes. The study result analyzing actual texts showed that translators replaced the original texts with general descriptions although figurative characters might be diluted a bit in order to make readers understood within the boundary without changing the intended meaning in departure language, where they found it difficult to properly switch to arrival language or to discover the equivalent frame in the departure language.
Abstract
In this study, a frame was defined as ‘a common cognitive structure among members in which they recognize and conceptualize certain conditions or situations in their daily lives’. Considering that a frame associated with figurative expressions might differ in each cultural background, the study focused on how translators filled the cultural frame gap centering on Chinese translation editions of Korean novels. In particular, conventional figurative expressions that are used as formulated patterns in a society condense a cultural uniqueness of a society as well as the frames and cognitive structures of the language users for certain situations. Thus, it is very often that a same meaning triggers different figurative frames depending on each culture. Such difference should be certainly reflected in translation processes. The study result analyzing actual texts showed that translators replaced the original texts with general descriptions although figurative characters might be diluted a bit in order to make readers understood within the boundary without changing the intended meaning in departure language, where they found it difficult to properly switch to arrival language or to discover the equivalent frame in the departure language.
참고문헌 (22)
- 박완서, "아주 오래된 농담" (2000), 실천문학사
- 신경숙, "감자 먹는 사람들" (2005), 창비
- 朴婉绪, "非常久远的玩笑(金泰成译)" (2009), 上海译文出版社
- 申京淑, "吃土豆的人", 1作家, 494, pp.151~164 (2010)
- 김순미, "영한번역에서의 은유법 연구", 번역학연구, 3(2), pp.81~112 (2002), 한국번역학회
- 김순미, "영한번역에서의 은유에 관한 연구: 인지 언어학의 관점에서", 박사, pp.2003
- Kim,Youngshin, "Application of Frames to the Practice of Translation with Reference to News Translation", 번역학연구, 6(1), pp.167~183 (2005), 한국번역학회
- 김효중, "새로운 번역을 위한 패러다임" (2004), 푸른사상
- 문정경, "번역에 있어서 프레임수용과 문제점", 석사, pp.2009
- 민충환, "박완서 소설어 사전" (2003), 백산출판사
- 박영순, "한국어은유 연구" (2000), 고려대학교 출판부
- 송미령, "중국어 비유와 중국 문화의 관계 고찰", 중국어문학논집, (41), pp.227~241 (2006), 중국어문학연구회
- George,L, "코끼리는 생각하지마" (2006), 삼인
- 임지룡, "인지언어학" (2000), 한국문화사
- 이창수, "문학작품에서의 비유적 표현의 번역", 국제회의 통역과 번역, 2, pp.57~83 (2000)
- 정혜연, "통역학개론" (2008), 한국문화사
- 최인철, "나를 바꾸는 지혜 프레임" (2007), 21세기북스
- Dan, S, "인지적 화용론:적합성 이론과 키뮤니케이션" (1994), 서울
- Deborah, T, "‘What’s in a frame? Surface evidence for underlying expectations’,Framing in discourse", pp.1993, New York
- 노양진, "삶으로서의 은유" (2006), 박이정
- Murray, K, "은유소개", 한국문화 사
- Suwako, W, "‘Cultural differences in framing: American and Japanese group discussions’. In Framing in discourse", pp.1993, New York