본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

모조 레진블락 근관에서 LightSpeed, ProTaper 및 Hybrid technique의 성형 효율 비교

Comparison of shaping ability using LightSpeed, ProTaper and Hybrid technique in simulated root canals

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류치의학

초록

The purpose of this study was to compare the shaping abilities of LightSpeed, ProTaper-Universal, and hybrid technique using S-series of ProTaper-Universal and LigthSpeed. The 72 simulated root canals of J-shape were used and classified as flowing 3 groups according to the instrumentation methods; Group P of 24 canal blocks were prepared with ProTaper-Universal, Group L was prepared with LightSpeed, and Group H was prepared with hybrid technique (initial shaping with ProTaper-Universal S1 and S2 and apical shaping with LightSpeed from #25 to #50). A second-year resident of Endodontic department prepared the resin block canals to apical size #50 (F5 in Group P). The time lapses for instrumentation and the reduction of root canal curvature after shaping were measured. The pre- and post-instrumented root canals were scanned and superimposed to evaluate and calculate the increased canal width and apical centering ratio. The results were as followings: Group L and H showed significant less instrumentation time than Group P (p < 0.05). The ProTaper system showed greater reduction of root canal curvature and working length diminishment than other methods (p < 0.05). LightSpeed system showed best canal curvature preserving characteristics. The Group P had greater instrumented widths at all levels examined (p < 0.05). Group L and Group H showed lower centering ratio (ability to preserve the canal center; the lower ratio means the better canal center preservation) than Group P (p < 0.05). Group H had the lowest centering ratio at the 1 mm level.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the shaping abilities of LightSpeed, ProTaper-Universal, and hybrid technique using S-series of ProTaper-Universal and LigthSpeed. The 72 simulated root canals of J-shape were used and classified as flowing 3 groups according to the instrumentation methods; Group P of 24 canal blocks were prepared with ProTaper-Universal, Group L was prepared with LightSpeed, and Group H was prepared with hybrid technique (initial shaping with ProTaper-Universal S1 and S2 and apical shaping with LightSpeed from #25 to #50). A second-year resident of Endodontic department prepared the resin block canals to apical size #50 (F5 in Group P). The time lapses for instrumentation and the reduction of root canal curvature after shaping were measured. The pre- and post-instrumented root canals were scanned and superimposed to evaluate and calculate the increased canal width and apical centering ratio. The results were as followings: Group L and H showed significant less instrumentation time than Group P (p < 0.05). The ProTaper system showed greater reduction of root canal curvature and working length diminishment than other methods (p < 0.05). LightSpeed system showed best canal curvature preserving characteristics. The Group P had greater instrumented widths at all levels examined (p < 0.05). Group L and Group H showed lower centering ratio (ability to preserve the canal center; the lower ratio means the better canal center preservation) than Group P (p < 0.05). Group H had the lowest centering ratio at the 1 mm level.

참고문헌 (47)

  1. Ruddle C.J., "Cleaning and shaping root canal systems. in : Pathways of the pulp", pp.231~291 (2002), CV Mosby
  2. Walia H.M., "An initial investigation of the bending and torsional properties of Nitinol root canal files", J Endod, 14, pp.346~351 (1988)
  3. Schäfer E., "Comparison of hand stainless steel and nickel titanium rotary instrumentation: a clinical study", J Endod, 30, pp.432~435 (2004)
  4. Chen J.L., "A comparison of stainless steel hand and rotary nickel-titanium instrumentation using a silicone impression technique", Aust Dent J, 47, pp.12~20 (2002)
  5. Garip Y., "The use of computed tomography when comparing nickel-titanium and stainless steel files during preparation of simulated curved canals", Int Endod J, 34, pp.452~457 (2001)
  6. Schäfer E., "Shaping ability of Hero 642 rotary nickeltitanium instruments and stainless steel hand K-Flexofiles in simulated curved root canals", Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 92, pp.215~220 (2001)
  7. West J., "Endodontic Update 2006", J Esthet Restor Dent, 18(5), pp.280~300 (2006)
  8. Kim H.C., "Comparison of forces generated during root canal shaping and residual stresses of three nickel-titanium rotary files by using a three-dimensional finite-element analysis", J Endod, 34(6), pp.743~747 (2008)
  9. Ankrum M.T., "K3 Endo, ProTaper, and ProFile systems: breakage and distortion in severely curved root of molars", J Endod, 30(4), pp.234~237 (2004)
  10. Bergmans L., "Progressive versus constant tapered shaft design using Ni-Ti rotary instruments", Int Endod J, 36(4), pp.288~295 (2003)
  11. Clauder T., "ProTaper NT system", Dent Clin North Am, 48(1), pp.87~111 (2004)
  12. Calberson F.L., "Shaping ability of ProTaper Nickel-Titanium files in simulated resin root canals", Int Endod J, 37(9), pp.613~623 (2004)
  13. Schäfer E., "Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 1. Shaping ability in simulated curved canals", Int Endod J, 37(4), pp.229~238 (2004)
  14. Peters O.A., "ProTaper rotary root canal preparation: effects of canal anatomy on final shape analysed by micro CT", Int Endod J, 36(1), pp.86~92 (2003)
  15. 이철환, "수종의 엔진구동형 Nickel-Titanium file을 이용한근관형성 방법이 근관만곡도 유지능력에 미치는 영향", Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics, 28(1), pp.41~49 (2003), 대한치과보존학회
  16. "Lightspeed recommended technique guide" (1994), Lightspeed Technology
  17. Thompson S.A., "Dummer PH. Shaping ability of Lightspeed rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals. Part 1", J Endod, 23, pp.698~702 (1997)
  18. Knowles K.I., "Incidence of instrument separation using LightSpeed rotary instruments", J Endod, 32, pp.14~16 (2006)
  19. Walsch H., "The hybrid concept of nickel-titanium rotary instrumentation", Dent Clin North Am, 48(1), pp.183~202 (2004)
  20. 박세희, "만곡모형근관에서 초심자가 근관형성시 Ni-Ti 전동파일의 효용성", Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics, 28(2), pp.146~155 (2003), 대한치과보존학회
  21. 홍은숙, "ProTaper를 사용한 다양한 hybrid instrumentation methods의 근관성형 효율 비교", Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics, 31(1), pp.11~19 (2006), 대한치과보존학회
  22. Berutti E., "Comparative analysis of torsional and bending stresses in two mathematical models of nickel-titanium rotary instruments: ProTaper versus ProFile", J Endod, 29(1), pp.15~19 (2003)
  23. Barbakow F., "The LightSpeed System", Dent Clin North Am, 48(1), pp.113~135 (2004)
  24. Schneider S.W., "A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canals", Oral Surg, 32, pp.271~275 (1971)
  25. Schäfer E., "Roentgenographic investigation of frequency and degree of canal curvatures in human permanent teeth", J Endod, 28(3), pp.211~216 (2002)
  26. Gunday M., "A comparative study of three different root canal curvature measurement techniques and measuring the canal access angle in curved canals", J Endod, 31, pp.796~798 (2005)
  27. Calhoun G., "The effects of four instrumentation techniques on root canal shape", J Endod, 14(6), pp.273~277 (1988)
  28. Kosa D.A., "An analysis of canal centering using mechanical instrumentation techniques", J Endod, 25(6), pp.441~445 (1999)
  29. Schilder H., "Cleaning and shaping the root canal", Dent Clin North Am, 18(2), pp.269~296 (1974)
  30. Young GR, "The principles of techniques for cleaning root canals", Aust Dent J, 52(1), pp.S52~63 (2007)
  31. Peters O.A., "Current challenges and concepts in the preparation of root canal systems: a review", J Endod, 30(8), pp.559~567 (2004)
  32. Versümer J., "A comparative study of root canal preparation using Profile .04 and Lightspeed rotary Ni-Ti instruments", Int Endod J, 35(1), pp.37~46 (2002)
  33. 김정원, "다양한 전동 니켈 티타늄 파일과 혼합사용법에 의한 근관 성형 효육 비교", 대한치과보존학회지, 32(6), pp.530~541 (2007), 대한치과보존학회
  34. Hülsmann M., "A comparative study of root canal preparation using FlexMaster and HERO 642 rotary Ni-Ti instruments", Int Endod J, 36(5), pp.358~366 (2003)
  35. Yun H.H., "A comparison of the shaping abilities of 4 nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated root canals", Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 95(2), pp.228~233 (2003)
  36. Paqué F., "Comparison of root canal preparation using RaCe and ProTaper rotary Ni-Ti instruments", Int Endod J, 38(1), pp.8~16 (2005)
  37. Hata G., "A comparison of shaping ability using ProFile, GT file, and Flex-R endodontic instruments in simulated canals", J Endod, 28(4), pp.316~321 (2002)
  38. Kum K.Y., "Shaping ability of three ProFile rotary instrumentation techniques in simulated resin root canals", J Endod, 26, pp.719~723 (2000)
  39. Thompson S.A., "Shaping ability of Lightspeed rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals. Part 2", J Endod, 23, pp.742~747 (1997)
  40. Portenier I.F., "Preparation of the apical part of the root canal by the Lightspeed and step-back techniques", Int Endod J, 31, pp.103~111 (1998)
  41. Turpin Y.L., "Impact of torsional and bending inertia on root canal instruments", J Endod, 27(5), pp.333~336 (2001)
  42. Rollison S., "Efficacy of bacterial removal from instrumented root canals in vitro related to instrumentation technique and size", Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 94(3), pp.366~371 (2002)
  43. Glossen C.R., "A comparison of root canal preparations using Ni-Ti hand, Ni-Ti engine-driven, and K-Flex endodontic instruments", J Endod, 21, pp.146~151 (1995)
  44. Schäfer E., "Efficiency of rotary nickel-titanium FlexMaster instruments compared with stainless steel hand K Flexofile-Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and instrumentation results in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth", Int Endod J, 35, pp.514~521 (2002)
  45. Schäfer E., "Efficiency of rotary nickeltitanium K3 instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-Flexofile. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth", Int Endod J, 36, pp.208~217 (2003)
  46. Griffiths I.T., "Canal shapes produced sequentially during instrumentation with Quantec LX rotary nickel-titanium instruments: a study in simulated canals", Int Endod J, 33, pp.346~354 (2000)
  47. Schäfer E., "Comparative study on the shaping ability and cleaning efficiency of rotary Mtwo instruments. Part 1. Shaping ability in simulated curved canals", Int Endod J, 39, pp.196~202 (2006)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)