근단부 성형 크기에 따른 다양한 전동 니켈티타늄 파일의 중심 변위율 및 만곡도 감소 비교
Comparison of the centering ratio and canal curvature reduction according to the apical preparation size using various NiTi rotary instruments
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study was to compare the centering ratio and reduction of canal curvature according to the preparation sizes of #30, #40 and #50 using three rotary NiTi instruments which have different shaft tapers. Seventy-two simulated root canals in clear resin blocks (Endo Training Bloc; Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) were divided as following 3 groups according to the file system; the 24 canal blocks prepared with each of ProTaper Universal system (Group P), LightSpeed eXtra system (Group L), and K3 (Group K). The pre- and post-instrumented root canals were scanned and superimposed to evaluate and calculate the centering ratio and reduction of canal curvature. Mean scores of each group were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Duncan’s multiple range test for post-hoc comparison. The results were as followings: 1. Group L showed better centering ratio, followed by K and P. And all experimental groups generally showed increasing tendency of centering ratio as the apical size was increasing from #30 to #50, except at 1 mm level of group P where showed reducing tendency of centering ratio. The smaller the ratio, the better the instrument remained centered in the canal. 2. Group P showed more decrease of canal curvature at all apical shaping size (p < 0.05) Under the conditions of this study, the shaft design could affect the quality of canal shaping and the smooth taperless flexible (LightSpeed) shaft design was capable of preparing canals with good morphological characteristics in curved canals.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare the centering ratio and reduction of canal curvature according to the preparation sizes of #30, #40 and #50 using three rotary NiTi instruments which have different shaft tapers. Seventy-two simulated root canals in clear resin blocks (Endo Training Bloc; Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) were divided as following 3 groups according to the file system; the 24 canal blocks prepared with each of ProTaper Universal system (Group P), LightSpeed eXtra system (Group L), and K3 (Group K). The pre- and post-instrumented root canals were scanned and superimposed to evaluate and calculate the centering ratio and reduction of canal curvature. Mean scores of each group were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Duncan’s multiple range test for post-hoc comparison. The results were as followings: 1. Group L showed better centering ratio, followed by K and P. And all experimental groups generally showed increasing tendency of centering ratio as the apical size was increasing from #30 to #50, except at 1 mm level of group P where showed reducing tendency of centering ratio. The smaller the ratio, the better the instrument remained centered in the canal. 2. Group P showed more decrease of canal curvature at all apical shaping size (p < 0.05) Under the conditions of this study, the shaft design could affect the quality of canal shaping and the smooth taperless flexible (LightSpeed) shaft design was capable of preparing canals with good morphological characteristics in curved canals.
참고문헌 (32)
- Schilder H., "Canal debridement and disinfection. in : Pathways of the Pulp", pp.175~ (1984), MO Mosby
- Pettiette M.T., "Evaluation of success rate of endodontic treatment performed by students with stainless-steel K-files and nickeltitanium hand files", J Endod, 27, pp.124~127 (2001)
- Walia H.M., "An initial investigation of the bending and torsional properties of Nitinol root canal files", J Endod, 14(7), pp.346~351 (1998)
- Schäfer E., "Comparison of hand stainless steel and nickel titanium rotary instrumentation: a clinical study", J Endod, 30(6), pp.432~435 (2004)
- Chen J.L., "A comparison of stainless steel hand and rotary nickel-titanium instrumentation using a silicone impression technique", Aust Dent J, 47(1), pp.12~20 (2002)
- Garip Y., "The use of computed tomography when comparing nickel-titanium and stainless steel files during preparation of simulated curved canals", Int Endod J, 34(6), pp.452~457 (2001)
- Glosson C.R., "A comparison of root canal preparations using Ni-Ti hand, Ni-Ti engine-driven, and K-Flex endodontic instruments", J Endod, 21(3), pp.146~151 (1995)
- "K3 Endo overview"[URL]
- Bergmans E., "Mechanical root canal preparation with Ni-Ti rotary instruments: rationale, performance and safety", Am J Dent, 14(5), pp.324~333 (2001), Status report for the American Journal of Dentistry
- Ayar L., "Shaping ability of ProFile and K3 rotary Ni-Ti instruments when used in a variable tip sequence in simulated curved root canals", Int Endod J, 37, pp.593~601 (2004)
- Bergmans L., "Lambrechts Progressive versus constant tapered shaft design using Ni-Ti rotary instruments", Int Endod J, 36(4), pp.288~295 (2003)
- Kim T.O., "Stress distribution of three Ni-Ti rotary files under bending and torsional conditions using a mathematic analysis", Int Endod J, 42, pp.14~21 (2009)
- Kim H.C., "Comparison of forces generated during root canal shaping and residual stresses of three nickel-titanium rotary files by using a threedimensional finite-element analysis", J Endod, 34(6), pp.743~747 (2008)
- "Lightspeed recommended technique guide" (1994), Lightspeed Technology
- Thompson S.A., "Shaping ability of Lightspeed rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals. Part 1", J Endod, 23(11), pp.698~702 (1997)
- Thompson S.A., "Shaping ability of Lightspeed rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals. Part 2", J Endod, 23(12), pp.742~747 (1997)
- Portenier I.F., "Preparation of the apical part of the root canal by the Lightspeed and step-back techniques", Int Endod J, 31(2), pp.103~111 (1998)
- Tharuni S.L., "A comparison of canal preparation using the K-file and Lightspeed in resin blocks", J Endod, 22(9), pp.474~476 (1996)
- Knowles K.I., "Incidence of instrument separation using LightSpeed rotary instruments", J Endod, 32(1), pp.14~16 (2006)
- Schilder H., "Cleaning and shaping the root canal", Dent Clin North Am, 18(2), pp.269~296 (1974)
- Hartmann M.S., "Camargo Fontanella VR, Vanni JR. Canal Transportation after Root Canal Instrumentation: A Comparative Study with Computed Tomography", J Endod, 33(8), pp.962~965 (2007)
- Weine F.S., "The effect of preparation procedures on original canal shape and on apical foramen shape", J Endod, 1(8), pp.255~262 (1975)
- Schneider S.W., "A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canals", Oral Surg, 32, pp.271~275 (1971)
- Cohen S., "Cleaning and shaping root canal systems. Pathways of the pulp", pp.306~ (2006), MO Mosby
- Dummer P.M.H., "A method for the construction of simulated canals in clear resin blocks", Int Endod J, 24(2), pp.63~66 (1991)
- Tharuni S.L., "A Comparison of Canal Preparation Using the K-File and Lightspeed in Resin Blocks", J Endod, 22(9), pp.474~476 (1996)
- Griffiths I.T., "Canal shapes produced sequentially during instrumentation with Quantec LX rotary nickeltitanium instruments: a study in simulated canals", Int Endod J, 33(4), pp.346~354 (2000)
- Thompson S.A., "Shaping Ability of Lightspeed Rotary Nickel-Titanium Instruments in Simulated Root Canals. Part 2", J Endod, 23(12), pp.742~747 (1997)
- Turpin Y.L., "Impact of torsional and bending inertia on root canal instruments", J Endod, 27(5), pp.333~336 (2001)
- Thompson S.A., "Shaping Ability of Lightspeed Rotary Nickel-Titanium Instruments in Simulated Root Canals. Part 1", J Endod, 23(11), pp.698~702 (1997)
- Barbakow F., "The LightSpeed System", Dent Clin North Am, 48(1), pp.113~135 (2004)
- Walsch H., "The hybrid concept of nickel-titanium rotary instrumentation", Dent Clin North Am, 48(1), pp.183~202 (2004)