레진모형근관에서 엔진구동형 및 수동형 ProTaper파일로 근관성형 후 근관형태 변화에 대한 비교연구
A comparative study of the canal configuration after shaping by protaper rotary and hand files in resin simulated canals
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
본 연구는 형태 및 재질이 동일한 엔진구동형 ProTaper 파일과 수동형 ProTaper 파일을 이용하여 레진모형근관을 성형한 후 근관형태 변화를 비교 분석하고자 시행되었다. 본 연구에서는 레진모형근관으로 총 40개의 J자와 S자의 근관 형태가 재현된 ENDO-TRAINING BLOC을 사용하였다. 근관 성형 기구로는 엔진구동형 Ni-Ti 파일로 ProTaperTM, 수동형 Ni-Ti 파일로 ProTaper For Hand Use를 사용하였다. 사용된 레진모형근관과 파일의 종류에 따라 10개씩 4개의 그룹으로 나누어 근관성형을 시행하였다. 근관 성형 전·후 이미지를 스캐너 (Color scanner, UMAX Technologies, Inc., USA)를 이용하여 얻은 후, Photoshop 7.0 프로그램 (Adobe System Inc., USA)을 이용하여 이미지를 중첩하였다. 이미지 분석 프로그램 (Image-Pro Plus, Media Cybernetic, USA)을 이용하여 치근단 쪽에서부터 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 및 7 mm 수준에서 근관 성형에 따른 근관의 내측 및 외측 폭경의 변화량, 근관 총폭경의 변화량, 근관 중심축의 변위량을 측정하였다. 또한 근관 성형 시간을 기록하였다. 두 기구 사이의 유의성 검정을 위해 독립 표본 t-검정을 시행하여, 근관 성형 시 수동형 ProTaper 파일이 엔진구동형 ProTaper 파일에 비해 근관 중심축의 변위가 유의하게 덜 일어나며 근관의 원래 형태를 더욱 잘 유지할 수 있지만, 근관 성형시간은 길어질 수 있다는 결론을 얻었다.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare the canal configuration after shaping by ProTaper rotary files and ProTaper hand files in resin simulated canals. Forty resin simulated canals with a curvature of J-shape and S-shape were divided into four groups by 10 blocks each. Simulated root canals in resin block were prepared by ProTaper rotary files and ProTaper hand files using a crown-down pressureless technique. All simulated canals were prepared up to size #25 file at end-point of preparation. Pre- and post-instrumentation images were recorded with color scanner. Assessment of canal shape was completed with an image analysis program. Measurements were made at 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 mm from the apex. At each level, outer canal width, inner canal width, total canal width, and amount of transportation from original axis were recorded. Instrumentation time was recorded. The data were analyzed statistically using independent t-test. The result was that ProTaper hand files cause significantly less canal transportation from original axis of canal body and maintain original canal configuration better than ProTaper rotary files, however ProTaper hand files take more shaping time.
참고문헌 (26)
- "Cleaning and shaping the root canal", 18, pp.269~296 (1974)
- "Filling root canals in three dimensions", 11, pp.723~744 (1967)
- "A comparison of canal prepararion in straight and curved root canals", 32, pp.271~275 (1971)
- "An initial investigation of the bending and torsional properties of Nitinol root canal files", 14, pp.346~351 (1988)
- "Effectiveness of nickel-titanium files for preparing curved root canals", 11, pp.121~123 (1995)
- "A comparison of root canal preparations using Ni-Ti hand", pp.146~151 (1995)
- "A comparison of canal preparation with nickel-titanium and stainless steel instruments", 21, pp.173~176 (1995)
- "A comparison of the shaping abilities of 4 nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated root canals", 95, pp.228~233 (2003)
- "A comparison of shaping ability using ProFile and Flex-R endodontic instruments in simulated canals", pp.316~321 (2002)
- "A comparison of stainless steel Flexofiles and nickel-titanium NiTiFlex files during the shaping of simulated canals", 30, pp.25~34 (1997)
- "Comparison of nickel-titanium and stainless steel hand-file instrumentation using computed tomography", 22, pp.369~375 (1996)
- "Analysis of Ni-Ti versus stainless steel instrumentation in resin simulated canals", 23, pp.232~235 (1997)
- "A comparison of Greater Taper files and stainless steel files to shape curved root canals", pp.715~718 (2001)
- "Cyclic fatigue testing of nickel-titanium endodontic instruments", 23, pp.77~85 (1997)
- "Microscopic evaluation of three endodontic files pre and postinstrumentation", 24, pp.461~464 (1998)
- "Shaping ability of GTTM Rotary Files in simulated resin root canals", 35, pp.607~614 (2002)
- "The effect of different files on the preparation shape of severely curved canals", pp.1~7
- "The validity of simulated root canals for the investigation of the prepared root canal shape", pp.240~246
- "Comparison of mechanical and standard hand instrumentation techniques in curved root canals", pp.230~234
- "Comparison of root canal preparation using different automated devices and hand instrumentation", pp.141~145
- "A comparison of the effect of modified and nonmodified instrument tips on apical canal configuration", 12, pp.293~300 (1986)
- "Shaping ability of Quantec Series 2000 rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals:Part 2", 31, pp.268~274 (1998)
- "Shaping ability of Quantec Series 2000 rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals:Part 1", 31, pp.259~267 (1998)
- "Canal shapes produced sequentially during instrumentation with Quantec LX rotary nickel-titanium instruments:a study in simulated canals", 33, pp.346~54 (2000)
- "Location of contact areas on rotary Profile instruments in relationship to the forces developed during mechanical preparation on extracted teeth", 32, pp.108~14 (1999)
- "Location of contact areas on rotary Profile instruments in relationship to the forces developed during mechanical preparation on extracted teeth", 32, pp.108~14 (1999)