본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

디지털 방식을 이용하여 제작한 전부지르코니아 수복물의 변연 적합도 평가

Evaluation of marginal fit of monolithic zirconia restoration by digital impression

2

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류치의학

초록

Purpose : The purpose of this study was to compare the marginal fit of monolithic zirconia restorations fabricated form the conventional and the digital impression technique. Materials and methods : Ten patients were restored with monolithic zirconia restorations fabricated from the digital and the conventional impression technique. Before definitive insertion, silicone replicas were produced from all twenty crowns. The silicone replicas were cut in three sections; each section was evaluated at two points. The measurement was carried out by using a measuring microscope (Olympus BX 51) and I-Solution. Data from the silicone replica scores were analyzed by Shapiro-Wilk test for normal distribution and the t-test for equality of two population’s mean. All tests were performed with -level of 0.05. Results : The average marginal gaps of monolithic zirconia restorations were 133.81 36.46 for the conventional impression technique, 90.07 9.47 for the digital impression technique. No statistical differences were found between the two impression techniques Conclusion : Both prostheses presented clinically acceptable results with comparing the marginal fit.

Abstract

Purpose : The purpose of this study was to compare the marginal fit of monolithic zirconia restorations fabricated form the conventional and the digital impression technique. Materials and methods : Ten patients were restored with monolithic zirconia restorations fabricated from the digital and the conventional impression technique. Before definitive insertion, silicone replicas were produced from all twenty crowns. The silicone replicas were cut in three sections; each section was evaluated at two points. The measurement was carried out by using a measuring microscope (Olympus BX 51) and I-Solution. Data from the silicone replica scores were analyzed by Shapiro-Wilk test for normal distribution and the t-test for equality of two population’s mean. All tests were performed with -level of 0.05. Results : The average marginal gaps of monolithic zirconia restorations were 133.81 36.46 for the conventional impression technique, 90.07 9.47 for the digital impression technique. No statistical differences were found between the two impression techniques Conclusion : Both prostheses presented clinically acceptable results with comparing the marginal fit.

참고문헌 (29)

  1. Piconi C, "Zirconia as a ceramic biomateria", Biomeaterials, 20, pp.1~25 (1990)
  2. Koutayas SO, "Zirconia in dentistry: part 2. Evidence-based clinical break-through", Eur J Esthet Dent, 4, pp.348~380 (2009)
  3. Rinke S, "Prospective evaluation of zirconia posterior fixed partial dentures: 7-year clinical results", Int J Prosthodont, 26, pp.164~171 (2013)[DOI]
  4. Albashaireh ZS, "Two-body wear of different ceramic materials opposed to zirconia ceramic", J Prosthet Dent, 104, pp.105~113 (2010)[DOI]
  5. Filser F, "Reliability and strength of all-ceramic dental restorations fabricated by direct ceramic machining (DCM)", Int J Comput Dent, 4, pp.89~106 (2001)
  6. Christensen GJ, "Impressions are changing: deciding on conventional, digital or digital plus in-office milling", J Am Dent Assoc, 140, pp.1301~1304 (2009)[DOI]
  7. Mormann WH, "The evolution of the CEREC system", J Am Dent Assoc, 137(Suppl), pp.7S~13S (2006)
  8. Henkel GL, "A comparison of fixed prostheses generated from conventional vs digitally scanned dental impressions", Compend Contin Educ Dent, 28, pp.422~ (2007)
  9. Schwartz IS, "A review of methods and techniques to improve the fit of cast restorations", J Prosthet Dent, 56, pp.279~283 (1986)[DOI]
  10. Felton DA, "Effect of in vivo crown margin discrepancies on periodontal health", J Prosthet Dent, 65, pp.357~364 (1991)[DOI]
  11. Schwartz NL, "Unserviceable crowns and fixed partial dentures: life-span and causes for loss of serviceability", J Am Dent Assoc, 81, pp.1395~1401 (1970)[DOI]
  12. Karlsson S, "A clinical evaluation of fixed bridges, 10 years following insertion", J Oral Rehabil, 13, pp.423~432 (1986)[DOI]
  13. "Reports of councils and bureaus: Revised american national standards institute", american dental association specification No. 8 for zinc phosphate cement, 1978, pp.96, 121~123
  14. Sorensen SE, "Gingival and alveolar bone reaction to marginal fit of subgingival crown margins", Scand J Dent Res, 94, pp.109~114 (1986)
  15. Christensen GJ, "Marginal fit of gold inlay castings", J Prosthet Dent, 16, pp.297~305 (1966)[DOI]
  16. Ostlund LE, "Cavity design and mathematics: their effect on gaps at the margins of cast restorations", Oper Dent, 10, pp.122~137 (1985)
  17. McLean JW, "Polycarboxylate cements: five years' experience in general practice", Br Dent J, 132, pp.9~15 (1972)[DOI]
  18. Gulker I, "Margins", N Y State Dent J, 51, pp.213~215 (1985)
  19. Kydd WL, "Marginal leakage of cast gold crowns luted with zinc phosphate cement: an in vivo study", J Prosthet Dent, 75, pp.9~13 (1996)[DOI]
  20. Sorensen JA, "A standardized method for determination of crown margin fidelity", J Prosthet Dent, 64, pp.18~24 (1990)[DOI]
  21. Moon BH, "A study on the marginal fit of all-ceramic crown using CCD camera", J Korean Acad Prosthodont, 36, pp.273~292 (1998)
  22. Leong D, "Marginal fit of machine-milled titanium and cast titanium single crowns", Int J Prosthodont, 7, pp.440~447 (1994)
  23. Molin M, "The fit of gold inlays and three ceramic inlay systems: A clinical and in vitro study", Acta Odontol Scand, 51, pp.201~206 (1993)[DOI]
  24. Laurent M, "Clinical evaluation of the marginal fit of cast crowns-validation of the silicone replica method", J Oral Rehabil, 35, pp.116~122 (2008)[DOI]
  25. Rahme HY, "In vitro evaluation of the "replica technique" in the measurement of the fit of Procera crowns", J Contemp Dent Pract, 9, pp.25~32 (2008)
  26. Holmes JR, "Considerations in measurement of marginal fit", J Prosthet Dent, 62, pp.405~408 (1989)[DOI]
  27. White SN, "Effect of seating force on film thickness of new adhesive luting agents", J Prosthet Dent, 68, pp.476~481 (1992)[DOI]
  28. Reich S, "Clinical fit of all-ceramic three-unit fixed partial dentures, generated with three different CAD", CAM systems, 2005, pp.113, 174~179
  29. Kunii J, "Effect of sintering on the marginal and internal fit of CAD", CAM-fabricated zirconia frameworks, 2007, pp.26, 820~826

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (3건)