Analyzing Color Difference of Digital Cameras Under Different Color Temperatures
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose : Dental clinics had a variety of lighting conditions, which could affect digital photography. Digital Single-Lens Reflex Camera (DSLR) was usually used to take intraoral photos. Recently, there has been a growing trend to use smartphones with the advancement of technology. The aim of this study was to analyze the differences of photographs taken with digital and smartphone cameras under different color temperature conditions. Materials and Methods : Three types of camera equipment were used: a DSLR (EOS 800D; Canon, Tokyo, Japan) with a macro lens (EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro USM, Tokyo, Japan) and diffuser (Lumilab, Gimpo, Korea) and two types of smartphones; Galaxy (Samsung, Suwon, Korea) and iPhone (Apple, California, USA) with Smile line MDP (Smile line SA, St-lmier, Switzerland). All photographs were taken 30 times for every 500°K color temperature from 3500°K to 6000°K. Color information was extracted from the central part of the tooth using image editing software (Adobe Photoshop CS4, Adobe, California, USA). ΔE value was calculated by this formula based on CIE L*a*b* color systems. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS (version 23, SPSS, Chicago, USA), with a significance level of 0.05. Results : In this study, DSLR showed the highest ΔE value followed by iPhone and Galaxy. DSLR showed minimum ΔE value in 4O00°K, iPhone and Galaxy showed in 4500°K. The lowest L* value was DSLR, followed by iPhone and Galaxy. The highest a* value was DSLR, followed by iPhone and Galaxy, except for 4000°K. The lowest b* value was DSLR, followed by Galaxy and iPhone. So DSLR was the darkest, reddest, and bluest of the three equipment. Conclusion : Although there was a significant difference from the actual shade, Galaxy showed the most similar color. Because each device showed different results, it was essential to consider the characteristics of each imaging device.
Abstract
Purpose : Dental clinics had a variety of lighting conditions, which could affect digital photography. Digital Single-Lens Reflex Camera (DSLR) was usually used to take intraoral photos. Recently, there has been a growing trend to use smartphones with the advancement of technology. The aim of this study was to analyze the differences of photographs taken with digital and smartphone cameras under different color temperature conditions. Materials and Methods : Three types of camera equipment were used: a DSLR (EOS 800D; Canon, Tokyo, Japan) with a macro lens (EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro USM, Tokyo, Japan) and diffuser (Lumilab, Gimpo, Korea) and two types of smartphones; Galaxy (Samsung, Suwon, Korea) and iPhone (Apple, California, USA) with Smile line MDP (Smile line SA, St-lmier, Switzerland). All photographs were taken 30 times for every 500°K color temperature from 3500°K to 6000°K. Color information was extracted from the central part of the tooth using image editing software (Adobe Photoshop CS4, Adobe, California, USA). ΔE value was calculated by this formula based on CIE L*a*b* color systems. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS (version 23, SPSS, Chicago, USA), with a significance level of 0.05. Results : In this study, DSLR showed the highest ΔE value followed by iPhone and Galaxy. DSLR showed minimum ΔE value in 4O00°K, iPhone and Galaxy showed in 4500°K. The lowest L* value was DSLR, followed by iPhone and Galaxy. The highest a* value was DSLR, followed by iPhone and Galaxy, except for 4000°K. The lowest b* value was DSLR, followed by Galaxy and iPhone. So DSLR was the darkest, reddest, and bluest of the three equipment. Conclusion : Although there was a significant difference from the actual shade, Galaxy showed the most similar color. Because each device showed different results, it was essential to consider the characteristics of each imaging device.
참고문헌 (13)
- Tabata LF, "Color science and shade selection in operative dentistry: Essential elements for clinical success", pp.53~73 (2022), Springer international publishing
- Patel J, "Comparative evaluation of colour difference using different digital photography equipment to standardise colour assessment in dental photography", J Clin Diagn Res, 17, pp.ZC12~ZC16 (2023)[DOI]
- McLaren EA, "Photography in dentistry", J Calif Dent Assoc, 29, pp.735~742 (2001)
- Tam WK, "Dental shade matching using a digital camera", J Dent, 40, pp.e3~e10 (2012)[DOI]
- Lee JJ, "Consideration of the image acquisition result according to the camera white balance setting and the color temperature of the external light source", Dental Materials, 39, pp.e42~ (2023)[DOI]
- Sampaio CS, "Variability of color matching with different digital photography techniques and a gray reference card", J Prosthet Dent, 121, pp.333~339 (2019)[DOI]
- Yamanel K, "Assessment of color parameters of composite resin shade guides using digital imaging versus colorimeter", J Esthet Restor Dent, 22, pp.379~388 (2010)[DOI]
- Mahn E, "Comparison of visual analog shade matching, a digital visual method with a cross-polarized light filter, and a spectrophotometer for dental color matching", J Prosthet Dent, 125, pp.511~516 (2021)[DOI]
- Paul S, "Visual and spectrophotometric shade analysis of human teeth", J Dent Res, 81, pp.578~582 (2002)[DOI]
- Conde MV, "Perceptual image enhancement for smartphone real-time applications", Proceedings of the IEEE, 2023, 1848~1858
- Ignatov A, "Fast camera image denoising on mobile GPUs with deep learning, mobile ai 2021challenge: Report", Proceedings of the IEEE, 2021, 2515~2524
- Ignatov A, "Fast and accurate quantized camera scene detection on smartphones, mobile ai 2021challenge: Report", Proceedings of the IEEE, 2021, 2558~2568
- Sajjadi SH, "Effects of three types of digital camera sensors on dental specialists’ perception of smile esthetics : a preliminary double-blind clinical trial", J Prosthodont, 25, pp.675~681 (2016)[DOI]