Evaluation of the repeatability and matching accuracy between two identical intraoral spectrophotometers: an in vivo and in vitro study
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
PURPOSE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the repeatability and matching accuracy between two identical intraoral spectrophotometers. MATERIALS AND METHODS. The maxillary right central incisor, canine, and mandibular left central incisor of each of 30 patients were measured using 2 identical intraoral spectrophotometers with different serial numbers (EasyShade V). The color of each shade tab from 3 shade guides (VITA 3D-Master) was also determined with both devices. All measurements were performed by a single operator. Statistical analyses were performed to verify the repeatability, accuracy, and the differences between the devices with paired t-tests, one-way ANOVA, and intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) (α=.05). RESULTS. A high level of measurement repeatability (ICC>0.90) among L*, a*, and b* color components was observed within and between devices (P<.001). Intra-device matching agreement rates were 80.00% and 81.11%, respectively, while inter-device matching agreement rate was 51.85%. ANOVA revealed no significant different color values within each device, while paired t-test provided significant different color values between both devices. The CIEDE2000 color differences between both devices were 2.28±1.61 ∆E00 for in-vivo readings. Regarding the clinical matching accuracy of both devices, ∆E00 values between teeth and matching shade tabs were 3.05±1.19 and 2.86±1.02, respectively. CONCLUSION. Although two EasyShade V devices with different serial numbers show high repeatability of CIE L*, a*, and b* measurements, they could provide different color values and shade for the same tooth.
Abstract
PURPOSE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the repeatability and matching accuracy between two identical intraoral spectrophotometers. MATERIALS AND METHODS. The maxillary right central incisor, canine, and mandibular left central incisor of each of 30 patients were measured using 2 identical intraoral spectrophotometers with different serial numbers (EasyShade V). The color of each shade tab from 3 shade guides (VITA 3D-Master) was also determined with both devices. All measurements were performed by a single operator. Statistical analyses were performed to verify the repeatability, accuracy, and the differences between the devices with paired t-tests, one-way ANOVA, and intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) (α=.05). RESULTS. A high level of measurement repeatability (ICC>0.90) among L*, a*, and b* color components was observed within and between devices (P<.001). Intra-device matching agreement rates were 80.00% and 81.11%, respectively, while inter-device matching agreement rate was 51.85%. ANOVA revealed no significant different color values within each device, while paired t-test provided significant different color values between both devices. The CIEDE2000 color differences between both devices were 2.28±1.61 ∆E00 for in-vivo readings. Regarding the clinical matching accuracy of both devices, ∆E00 values between teeth and matching shade tabs were 3.05±1.19 and 2.86±1.02, respectively. CONCLUSION. Although two EasyShade V devices with different serial numbers show high repeatability of CIE L*, a*, and b* measurements, they could provide different color values and shade for the same tooth.
참고문헌 (31)
- Jahangiri L, "Relationship between tooth shade value and skin color: an observational study", J Prosthet Dent, 87, pp.149~152 (2002)[DOI]
- Brewer JD, "Advances in color matching", Dent Clin North Am, 48, pp.341~358 (2004)[DOI]
- Dagg H, "The influence of some different factors on the accuracy of shade selection", J Oral Rehabil, 31, pp.900~904 (2004)[DOI]
- Ragain JC Jr, "Minimum color differences for discriminating mismatch between composite and tooth color", J Esthet Restor Dent, 13, pp.41~48 (2001)[DOI]
- Paul SJ, "Conventional visual vs spectrophotometric shade taking for porcelain-fused-to-metal crowns: a clinical comparison", Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 24, pp.222~231 (2004)
- International Organization for Standardization, "ISO 5725-1. Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results - Part 1: General principles and definitions", ISO, ~ (1994)
- Kim-Pusateri S, "In vitro model to evaluate reliability and accuracy of a dental shade-matching instrument", J Prosthet Dent, 98, pp.353~358 (2007)[DOI]
- Lagouvardos PE, "Repeatability and interdevice reliability of two portable color selection devices in matching and measuring tooth col- or", J Prosthet Dent, 101, pp.40~45 (2009)[DOI]
- Lehmann KM, "Four color-measuring devices compared with a spectrophotometric reference system", J Dent, 38, pp.65~70 (2010)[DOI]
- Lehmann KM, "Repeatability of color-measuring devices", Eur J Esthet Dent, 6, pp.428~435 (2011)
- Sarafianou A, "Matching repeatability and interdevice agreement of 2 intraoral spectrophotometers", J Prosthet Dent, 107, pp.178~185 (2012)[DOI]
- Weyhrauch M, "Interdevice agreement of eight equivalent dental color measurement devices", Clin Oral Investig, 19, pp.2309~2318 (2015)[DOI]
- Tsiliagkou A, "Evaluation of reliability and validity of three dental color-matching devices", Int J Esthet Dent, 11, pp.110~124 (2016)
- Da Silva JD, "Clinical performance of a newly developed spectrophotometric system on tooth color reproduction", J Prosthet Dent, 99, pp.361~368 (2008)[DOI]
- Zenthofer A, "Comparison of the Easyshade Compact and Advance in vitro and in vivo", Clin Oral Investig, 18, pp.1473~1479 (2014)[DOI]
- Joiner A, "Tooth colour: a review of the literature", J Dent, 32, pp.3~12 (2004)
- Yuan K, "In vitro and in vivo evaluations of three computer-aided shade matching instruments", Oper Dent, 37, pp.219~227 (2012)
- van der Burgt TP, "A comparison of new and conventional methods for quantification of tooth color", J Prosthet Dent, 63, pp.155~162 (1990)[DOI]
- Karaagaclioglu L, "In vivo and in vitro assessment of an intraoral dental colorimeter", J Prosthodont, 19, pp.279~285 (2010)[DOI]
- Knezovic D, "In vivo and in vitro evaluations of repeatability and accuracy of VITA <TEX>$easyshade^{(R)}$<", TEX> advance 4.0 dental shade-matching device, 2015, pp.49, 112~118
- Colorimetry. Technical Report CIE Publication No.15:2004, 3rd ed., "Commission Internationale de l'Eclairage (CIE)", Central Bureau of the CIE, ~ (2004)
- Luo MR, "The development of the CIE 2000 color difference formula: CIEDE2000", Color Res Appl, 26, pp.340~350 (2001)[DOI]
- Ghinea R, "Color difference thresholds in dental ceramics", J Dent, 38, pp.e57~e64 (2010)[DOI]
- Perez Mdel M, "Dental ceramics: a CIEDE2000 acceptability thresholds for lightness, chroma and hue differences", J Dent, 39, pp.e37~e44 (2011)
- Xu BT, "Applicability of CIELAB", CIEDE2000 formula in visual color assessments of metal ceramic restorations, 2012, pp.40, 3~9
- Paravina RD, "Color difference thresholds in dentistry", J Esthet Restor Dent, 27, pp.S1~S9 (2015)[DOI]
- Seghi RR, "Spectrophotometric analysis of color differences between porcelain systems", J Prosthet Dent, 56, pp.35~40 (1986)[DOI]
- Yuan JC, "Defining a natural tooth color space based on a 3-dimensional shade system", J Prosthet Dent, 98, pp.110~119 (2007)[DOI]
- Ongul D, "Visual and instrumental evaluation of color match ability of 2 shade guides on a ceramic system.", J Prosthet Dent, 108, pp.9~14 (2012)[DOI]
- Hassel AJ, "Interexaminer reliability in clinical measurement of L*C*h* values of anterior teeth using a spectrophotometer", Int J Prosthodont, 20, pp.79~84 (2007)
- Fani G, "Spectrophotometric and visual shade measurements of human teeth using three shade guides", Am J Dent, 20, pp.142~146 (2007)