본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Adverse Effect of the Methanotroph Methylocystis sp. M6 on the Non-Methylotroph Microbacterium sp. NM2

1

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류생물학

초록

Several non-methylotrophic bacteria have been reported to improve the growth and activity of methanotrophs; however, their interactions remain to be elucidated. We investigated the interaction between Methylocystis sp. M6 and Microbacterium sp. NM2. A batch co-culture experiment showed that NM2 markedly increased the biomass and methane removal of M6. qPCR analysis revealed that NM2 enhanced both the growth and methane-monooxygenase gene expression of M6. A fed-batch experiment showed that co-culture was more efficient in removing methane than M6 alone (28.4 vs. 18.8 μmol·l-1·d-1), although the biomass levels were similar. A starvation experiment for 21 days showed that M6 population remained stable while NM2 population decreased by 66% in co-culture, but the results were opposite in pure cultures, indicating that M6 may cross-feed growth substrates from NM2. These results indicate that M6 apparently had no negative effect on NM2 when M6 actively proliferated with methane. Interestingly, a batch experiment involving a dialysis membrane indicates that physical proximity between NM2 and M6 is required for such biomass and methane removal enhancement. Collectively, the observed interaction is beneficial to the methanotroph but adversely affects the non-methylotroph; moreover, it requires physical proximity, suggesting a tight association between methanotrophs and non-methylotrophs in natural environments.

Abstract

Several non-methylotrophic bacteria have been reported to improve the growth and activity of methanotrophs; however, their interactions remain to be elucidated. We investigated the interaction between Methylocystis sp. M6 and Microbacterium sp. NM2. A batch co-culture experiment showed that NM2 markedly increased the biomass and methane removal of M6. qPCR analysis revealed that NM2 enhanced both the growth and methane-monooxygenase gene expression of M6. A fed-batch experiment showed that co-culture was more efficient in removing methane than M6 alone (28.4 vs. 18.8 μmol·l-1·d-1), although the biomass levels were similar. A starvation experiment for 21 days showed that M6 population remained stable while NM2 population decreased by 66% in co-culture, but the results were opposite in pure cultures, indicating that M6 may cross-feed growth substrates from NM2. These results indicate that M6 apparently had no negative effect on NM2 when M6 actively proliferated with methane. Interestingly, a batch experiment involving a dialysis membrane indicates that physical proximity between NM2 and M6 is required for such biomass and methane removal enhancement. Collectively, the observed interaction is beneficial to the methanotroph but adversely affects the non-methylotroph; moreover, it requires physical proximity, suggesting a tight association between methanotrophs and non-methylotrophs in natural environments.

참고문헌 (40)

  1. Hanson RS, "Methanotrophic bacteria", Microbiol. Rev, 60, pp.439~471 (1996)
  2. Semrau JD, "Methanotrophs and copper", FEMS Microbiol. Rev, 34, pp.496~531 (2010)
  3. Fox BG, "Haloalkene oxidation by the soluble methane monooxygenase from Methylosinus trichosporium OB3b : mechanistic and environmental implications", Biochemistry, 29, pp.6419~6427 (1990)
  4. Burrows KJ, "Substrate specificities of the soluble and particulate methane monooxygenases of Methylosinus trichosporium OB3b", Microbiology, 130, pp.3327~3333 (1984)
  5. Colby J, "The soluble methane mono-oxygenase of Methylococcus capsulatus (Bath). Its ability to oxygenate n-alkanes, n-alkenes, ethers, and alicyclic, aromatic and heterocyclic compounds", Biochem. J, 165, pp.395~402 (1977)
  6. Jiang H, "Methanotrophs: Multifunctional bacteria with promising applications in environmental bioengineering", Biochem. Eng. J, 49, pp.277~288 (2010)
  7. Huber-Humer M, "Biotic systems to mitigate landfill methane emissions", Waste Manag. Res, 26, pp.33~46 (2008)
  8. Dedysh SN, "Methylocella species are facultatively methanotrophic", J. Bacteriol, 187, pp.4665~4670 (2005)
  9. Knief C., "Diversity and habitat preferences of cultivated and uncultivated aerobic methanotrophic bacteria evaluated based on pmoA as molecular marker", Front Microbiol, 6, pp.1346~ (2015)
  10. Petersen JM, "Methanotrophic symbioses in marine invertebrates", Environ. Microbiol. Rep, 1, pp.319~335 (2009)
  11. Murase J, "Selective grazing of methanotrophs by protozoa in a rice field soil", FEMS Microbiol. Ecol, 65, pp.408~414 (2008)
  12. Kip N, "Global prevalence of methane oxidation by symbiotic bacteria in peat-moss ecosystems", Nat. Geosci, 3, pp.617~621 (2010)
  13. Raghoebarsing AA, "Methanotrophic symbionts provide carbon for photosynthesis in peat bogs", Nature, 436, pp.1153~1156 (2005)
  14. Van der Ha D, "A sustainable, carbon neutral methane oxidation by a partnership of methane oxidizing communities and microalgae", Water Res, 45, pp.2845~2854 (2011)
  15. Gonzalez JM, "Size-selective grazing on bacteria by natural assemblages of estuarine flagellates and ciliates", Appl. Environ. Microbiol, 56, pp.583~589 (1990)
  16. Atlas RM, "Microbial ecology: fundamentals and applications", pp.1997, Benjamin
  17. Iguchi H, "Stimulation of methanotrophic growth in cocultures by cobalamin excreted by rhizobia", Appl. Environ. Microbiol, 77, pp.8509~8515 (2011)
  18. Stock M, "Exploration and prediction of interactions between methanotrophs and heterotrophs", Res. Microbiol, 164, pp.1045~1054 (2013)
  19. Hršak D, "Growth characteristics and metabolic activities of the methanotrophic–heterotrophic groundwater community", J. Appl. Microbiol, 85, pp.448~456 (1998)
  20. Wilkinson TG, "Interactions in a mixed bacterial population growing on methane in continuous culture", Biotechnol. Bioeng, 16, pp.41~59 (1974)
  21. Jeong S-Y, "Density-dependent enhancement of methane oxidation activity and growth of methylocystis sp. by a non-methanotrophic bacterium Sphingopyxis sp", Biotechnol. Rep, 4, pp.128~133 (2014)
  22. Whittenbury R, "Enrichment, isolation and some properties of methane-utilizing bacteria", J. Gen. Microbiol, 61, pp.205~218 (1970)
  23. 이은희, "Characterization of Methane Oxidation by a Methanotroph Isolated from a Landfill Cover Soil, South Korea", Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 21(7), pp.753~756 (2011), 한국미생물·생명공학회
  24. Lee E-H, "Characterization of methane, benzene and toluene-oxidizing consortia enriched from landfill and riparian wetland soils", J. Hazard. Mater, 184, pp.313~320 (2010)
  25. Kim TG, "Characterization of a methane-oxidizing biofilm using microarray, and confocal microscopy with image and geostatic analyses", Appl. Microbiol. Biotech, 95, pp.1051~1059 (2012)
  26. Kim TG, "Development of droplet digital PCR assays for methanogenic taxa and examination of methanogen communities in full-scale anaerobic digesters", Appl. Microbiol. Biotech, 99, pp.445~458 (2015)
  27. Kim TG, "Comparison of droplet digital PCR and quantitative real-time PCR for examining population dynamics of bacteria in soil", Appl. Microbiol. Biotech, 98, pp.6105~6113 (2014)
  28. Chen Z, "Purification and characterization of a 50-kDa cysteine proteinase (gingipain) from Porphyromonas gingivalis", J. Biol. Chem, 267, pp.18896~18901 (1992)
  29. Xing X-H, "Effects of organic chemicals on growth of Methylosinus trichosporium OB3b", Biochem. Eng. J, 31, pp.113~117 (2006)
  30. Manickam N, "Characterization of the novel HCH-degrading strain, Microbacterium sp. ITRC1", Appl. Microbiol. Biotech, 69, pp.580~588 (2006)
  31. Sheng X, "Characterization of Microbacterium sp. F10a and its role in polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon removal in low-temperature soil", Can. J. Microbiol, 55, pp.529~535 (2009)
  32. Chen J-A, "Degradation of environmental endocrine disruptor di-2-ethylhexyl phthalate by a newly discovered bacterium, Microbacterium sp. strain CQ0110Y", Appl. Microbiol. Biotech, 74, pp.676~682 (2007)
  33. Ho A, "The more, the merrier: heterotroph richness stimulates methanotrophic activity", ISME J, 8, pp.1945~1948 (2014)
  34. 김태관, "Biodegradation Capacity Utilization as a New Index for Evaluating Biodegradation Rate of Methane", Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 23(5), pp.715~718 (2013), 한국미생물·생명공학회[DOI]
  35. Dianou D, "Characterization of methanotrophic bacteria isolated from a subtropical paddy field", FEMS Microbiol. Lett, 173, pp.163~173 (1999)
  36. Schroeckh V, "Intimate bacterial–fungal interaction triggers biosynthesis of archetypal polyketides in Aspergillus nidulans", Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 106, pp.14558~14563 (2009)
  37. Veraart A, "Living apart together—bacterial volatiles influence methanotrophic growth and activity", ISME J, 12, pp.1163~1166 (2018)
  38. Kankaala P, "Methanotrophic activity in relation to methane efflux and total heterotrophic bacterial production in a stratified, humic, boreal lake", Limnol. Oceanogr, 51, pp.1195~1204 (2006)
  39. Samuels GJ., "Trichoderma: a review of biology and systematics of the genus", Mycological Research, 8, pp.923~935 (1996)
  40. Stolp H., "The bdellovibrios: Bacterial parasites of bacteria", Annu. Rev. Phytopathol, 11, pp.53~76 (1973)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)