危機時代의 文學⋅批評⋅理論 ― 茅盾 硏究의 當代的 價値를 찾아서

Abstract

This study aims at identifying the ample possibilities of criticism from the Mao Dun's perspective that criticism is an art practice, politics and creation. His era may have required prudent and careful attitude that did not allow carelessness while respecting theoretical values. A theory does not necessarily mean a theoretical practice as Mao Dun's practice was ceaselessly pursuing potential and possible literary spectrums amid the tension between theory and practice, while slowing down hasty implementations of theories. Criticism may find an exit from a crisis when political possibilities and hidden interfaces between criticism and literature are discovered, and when unwavering efforts for self-reflection are followed in the “Excessive Theory” environment. Lastly, ‘the end of an era’ or ‘times of crisis’ may provide opportunities to reinterpret origins or classics. As the seemingly-established aspect of modern Chinese literature presents many questions, we need to re-examine every aspect of the literature and understand the contemporary implications so that we can build stepping stones to control the, so called “excessive consumption of theories,” of today. Mao Dun's ideas are still meaningful from many perspectives.