본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

중국 근현대문학사 담론과 타자화의 정치학

The Discourse about History of Chinese Modern Literature and the Politics of Othernization

1

조회

0

다운로드

5

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류중국어와문학

초록

The signifier of Chinese modern literature have slided incessantly, for example, ‘new literature(新文學)’, ‘xiandai(現代) literature-dangdai(當代) literature’, ‘20th century literature(二十世紀文學)’, ‘xiandangdai literature(現當代文學)’, ‘two-wings literature(雙翼文學)’ etc. This study presently fixed the signifier as the ‘Chinese modern literature’(‘geunhyundae moonhak’ in Korean, ‘xiandangdaiwenxue’ in Chinese) and investigated the discourse about the history of Chinese modern literature which have started after May forth movement. After May forth movement, it designated ‘new literature’ by itself, which was contrasted with ‘old literature’(舊文學), after new China, called it ‘xiandai literature(現代文學)’ and ‘dangdai literature(當代文學)’. In the ‘new era’, there was new discourse which was called as the discourse of ‘20th century literature(二十世紀中國文學)’, it criticized the trisection of jindai(近代)―xiandai(現代)―dangdai(當代), and widened the belt of consensus. At the beginning of the 21th century, ‘two-wings literature’ discourse was presented. It embraced the popular literature(通俗文學), that had been eliminated by new literature after May forth movement. This study conducted a follow-up survey about the fluid transition of the discourse about the history of Chinese modern literature and investigated ‘the politics of othernization’ which was embedded in the inner part.

Abstract

The signifier of Chinese modern literature have slided incessantly, for example, ‘new literature(新文學)’, ‘xiandai(現代) literature-dangdai(當代) literature’, ‘20th century literature(二十世紀文學)’, ‘xiandangdai literature(現當代文學)’, ‘two-wings literature(雙翼文學)’ etc. This study presently fixed the signifier as the ‘Chinese modern literature’(‘geunhyundae moonhak’ in Korean, ‘xiandangdaiwenxue’ in Chinese) and investigated the discourse about the history of Chinese modern literature which have started after May forth movement. After May forth movement, it designated ‘new literature’ by itself, which was contrasted with ‘old literature’(舊文學), after new China, called it ‘xiandai literature(現代文學)’ and ‘dangdai literature(當代文學)’. In the ‘new era’, there was new discourse which was called as the discourse of ‘20th century literature(二十世紀中國文學)’, it criticized the trisection of jindai(近代)―xiandai(現代)―dangdai(當代), and widened the belt of consensus. At the beginning of the 21th century, ‘two-wings literature’ discourse was presented. It embraced the popular literature(通俗文學), that had been eliminated by new literature after May forth movement. This study conducted a follow-up survey about the fluid transition of the discourse about the history of Chinese modern literature and investigated ‘the politics of othernization’ which was embedded in the inner part.

참고문헌 (59)

  1. 류짜이푸, "독백의 시대로부터 다성악의 시대로 in: 소설로 보는 현대중국" (1995), 종로서적출판사
  2. 박자영, "1990년대 이후 중국에서의 문화연구", 중국현대문학, (29), pp.21~52 (2004), 한국중국현대문학학회
  3. 서경식, "「홀로코스트, 팔레스타인 그리고 조선」, 『한겨레신문』, 2009.3.6.", ~ (2009)
  4. 쑨거, "일본을 관찰하는 시각", 문화과학, (5) (2008)
  5. 이남석, "차이의 정치―이제 소수를 위하여" (2001), 책세상
  6. 임춘성, "중국 근현대 문학사론의 검토와 과제", 중국현대문학, (12) (1997), 한국 중국현대문학학회
  7. 임춘성, "중국 근현대문학운동사" (1997), 한길사
  8. 임춘성, "중국 근대현대 무협소설의 근대성", 중국현대문학, (29), pp.163~194 (2004), 한국중국현대문학학회
  9. 임춘성, "‘서유럽 모던’과 ‘동아시아 근현대’ in: 동아시아의 문화와 문화적 정체성" (2009), 한울
  10. 장정아, "‘홍콩인’ 정체성의 정치 : 반환 후 본토자녀의 거류권 분쟁을 중심으로", 박사, pp.2003
  11. 전형준, "20세기 중국 문학론 비판 in: 현대 중국문학의 이해" (1996), 문학과지성사
  12. 제임스 프록터, "지금 스튜어트 홀" (2006), 앨피
  13. 陳思和, "20세기 중국문학의 이해" (1995), 청년사
  14. 천쓰허, "중국당대문학사" (2008), 문학동네
  15. 陳平原, "중국소설서사학" (1994), 살림출판사
  16. 陳平原, "중국 소설사: 이론과 실천" (2004), 이룸
  17. 한국중국현대문학학회, "중국현대문학과의 만남" (2006), 동녘
  18. 孔范今, "二十世紀中國文學史" (1997), 山東文藝出版社
  19. 唐金海, "20世紀中國文學通史" (2003), 東方出版中心
  20. 唐弢, "關於中國現代文的編寫問題" (1984), 北京師範大學出版社
  21. 唐韜, "中國現代文學史 (1-3)" (1980), 人民文學出版社
  22. 唐文一, "20世紀中國文學圖典" (2001), 四川人民出版社
  23. 李楊, "當代文學史寫作: 原則⋅方法與可能性―從陳思和主編的≪中國當代文學史敎程≫談起", 文學評論, 3 (2000)
  24. 李楊, "文學分期中的知識譜系學問題―從“當代文學”的“說法”談起", 文學評論, 5 (2003)
  25. 孟繁華, "中國當代文學發展史" (2004), 人民文學出版社
  26. 范伯群, "中國近現代通俗文學史 (上下)" (2000), 江蘇敎育出版社
  27. 范伯群, "中國現代通俗文學史(揷圖本)" (2007), 北京大學出版社
  28. 復旦大學中國語言文學系, "≪中國現代文學敎學方法與敎材國際學術硏討會(會議資料)≫, 2008年6月20日-21日, 上海大學⋅復旦大學, 上海", ~ (2008)
  29. 蘇光文, "20世紀中國文學發展史(上下)" (1996), 西南師範大學出版社
  30. 溫儒敏, "新文學現實主義的流變" (1988), 北京大學出版社
  31. 溫儒敏, "中國現當代文學學科槪要" (2005), 北京大學出版社
  32. 王宏志, "主觀願望與客觀環境之間―唐弢的文學史觀和他主編的≪中國現代文學史≫ in: 中國文學史的省思" (1993), 三聯書店
  33. 王瑤, "中國新文學史稿" (1982), 上海文藝出版社
  34. 王曉明, "序 in: 二十世紀中國文學史論(1)" (1997), 東方出版中心
  35. 王曉明, "二十世紀中國文學史論(1-3)" (1997), 東方出版中心
  36. 王曉明, "批評空間的開創: 二十世紀中國文學硏究" (1998), 東方出版中心
  37. 王曉明, "修订版序言 in: 二十世紀中國文學史論(上)" (2003), 東方出版中心
  38. 王曉明, "二十世紀中國文學史論(上下)" (2003), 東方出版中心
  39. 劉再復, "金庸小說在二十世紀中國文學史上的地位", 當代作家評論, 5 (1998)
  40. 任天石, "中國現代文學史學發展史" (2002), 江蘇文藝出版社
  41. 錢理群, "中國現代文學三十年" (1987), 上海文藝出版社
  42. 錢理群, "中國現代文學三十年(修訂本)" (1998), 北京大學出版社
  43. 錢理群, "矛盾與困惑中的寫作 in: 二十世紀中國文學史論(上)" (2003), 東方出版中心
  44. 程光煒, "中國現代文學史" (2000), 中國人民大學出版社
  45. 趙京華, "共同謀求現代文學史硏究的整體突破― ≪中國現代文學三十年≫作者與讀者對話會紀實", 中國現代文學硏究叢刊, 2 (1988)
  46. 朱棟霖, "中國現代文學史1917-1997(上⋅下)" (1999), 高等敎育出版社
  47. 陳遼, "百年中華文學史論(1898~1999)" (1999), 華東師範大學出版社
  48. 陳思和, "中國新文學整體觀" (1987), 上海文藝出版社
  49. 陳思和, "鷄鳴風雨" (1994), 學林出版社
  50. 陳思和, "關於編寫中國二十世紀文學史的幾個問題 in: 犬耕集" (1996), 上海遠東出版社
  51. 陳思和, "中國當代文學史敎程" (1999), 復旦大學出版社
  52. 陳平原, "中國小說敍事模式的轉變" (1988), 上海人民出版社
  53. 陳平原, "小說史:理論與實踐" (1993), 北京大學出版社
  54. 黃曼君, "中國20世紀文學理論批評史(上⋅下)" (2002), 中國文聯出版社
  55. 黃修己, "20世紀中國文學史(上⋅下)" (1998), 中山大學出版社
  56. 黃修己, "中國新文學史編纂史" (1995), 北京大學出版社
  57. 黃修己, "中國新文學史編纂史(第二版)" (2007), 北京大學出版社
  58. 黃子平, "論“二十世紀文學”", 文學評論, 5 (1985)
  59. 黃子平, "二十世紀中國文學三人談" (1988), 人民文學出版社

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)