20세기 초 중국의 근대지리학 수용 ― 『新民叢報』를 중심으로
The Acception of Modern Geography in Early Twentieth Century China: Focusing on the New People’s Miscellany(新民叢報)
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this paper, I mainly studied about the acception of modern geography in the early twentieth century China. First of all, I found the strong connection between the 100th issue of Issues for Discussion(淸議報) and the New People's Miscellany(新民叢報) in its arrangement of Articles. Considering these Journals are published by basically same members, we can realize the main reason for reconstruction in 100th issue is resulted from preparing the New People's Miscellany. In that process, ‘Modern geography', this field of knowledge was noticed and accepted. It's very interesting that they paid most attention to modern geography, especially “Environmental determinism”. In those days, they had strong aspirations to find a condition of modernization. That is why they was engrossed in the subject. Furthermore, they firmly believed the ‘Environmental determinism' will be able to help to accumulate modern knowledge, because it was viewed as a “Schema”, that is, the frame of understanding by themselves. And, It also needs to be mentioned that they continuously attended the boundary of their nation and stressed the importance of marking on it. Many maps in those days are advertised through similar slogan in their journal. These facts call us attention to the fact that they were awakening that the geographical information through several articles on “Environmental determinism” consequently developed the nationalism. But they were never stuck in “Environmental determinism”, also awared of its weak point that it easily go to mechanical determinism. It seemed that Yanfu(嚴復) had realized the seriousness of their inclination, so he opposed the idea of Liangqichao(梁啓超), in fact, his idea represented the other writers of magazine publisher. But after all, their ultimate aim is the same. In this respect, it's also noteworthy that the map on its cover design represents China with two rivers, because it can be regarded as the intensive symbol of their intention.
Abstract
In this paper, I mainly studied about the acception of modern geography in the early twentieth century China. First of all, I found the strong connection between the 100th issue of Issues for Discussion(淸議報) and the New People's Miscellany(新民叢報) in its arrangement of Articles. Considering these Journals are published by basically same members, we can realize the main reason for reconstruction in 100th issue is resulted from preparing the New People's Miscellany. In that process, ‘Modern geography', this field of knowledge was noticed and accepted. It's very interesting that they paid most attention to modern geography, especially “Environmental determinism”. In those days, they had strong aspirations to find a condition of modernization. That is why they was engrossed in the subject. Furthermore, they firmly believed the ‘Environmental determinism' will be able to help to accumulate modern knowledge, because it was viewed as a “Schema”, that is, the frame of understanding by themselves. And, It also needs to be mentioned that they continuously attended the boundary of their nation and stressed the importance of marking on it. Many maps in those days are advertised through similar slogan in their journal. These facts call us attention to the fact that they were awakening that the geographical information through several articles on “Environmental determinism” consequently developed the nationalism. But they were never stuck in “Environmental determinism”, also awared of its weak point that it easily go to mechanical determinism. It seemed that Yanfu(嚴復) had realized the seriousness of their inclination, so he opposed the idea of Liangqichao(梁啓超), in fact, his idea represented the other writers of magazine publisher. But after all, their ultimate aim is the same. In this respect, it's also noteworthy that the map on its cover design represents China with two rivers, because it can be regarded as the intensive symbol of their intention.
참고문헌 (18)
- "新民叢報", ~
- "淸議報", ~
- "浙江潮", ~
- 郭雙林, "西潮激蕩下的晩晴地理學" (2000), 北京大學出版社
- 岡田俊裕, "日本地理學史論―個人史的硏究" (2000), 古今書院
- 曾樂山, "中西哲學的融合―中國近代進化論的傳播" (1991), 安徽人民出版社
- 벤저민 슈워츠, "부와 권력을 찾아서" (2006), 한길사
- 권정화, "지리사상사 강의노트" (2009), 도서출판 한울
- 권용우, "지리학사" (2009), 도서출판 한울
- 테즈카 아키라, "근대지리학의 개척자들" (1998), 도서출판 한울
- Harm de Blij, "분노의 지리학 ― 공간으로 읽는 21세기 세계사" (2008), 천지인
- 海野一隆, "地圖的文化史" (2005), 新星出版社
- 千眞, "20世紀 初 中國의 智⋅德 담론과 ‘文’의 경계" (2008), 延世大學校
- 임종태, "서구 지리학에 대한 동아시아 세계지리 전통의 반응: 17-18세기 중국과 조선의 경우", 한국과학사학회지, 26(2), pp.315~344 (2004), 한국과학사학회
- 양일모, "지역과 학술―양계초의 인문지리학", 아시아문화, (23)
- 倪文君, "近代學科形成科程中的滿淸地理敎科書述論", 華東師範大學學報 (2006)
- 曲洪波, "近代“地理環境論”對 梁啓超學術著述的影響", 甘肅社會科學, 3 (2008)
- 武軍, "地理環境論與梁啓超的“新史學”理論", 北京科技大學學報(社會科學版), 23(1) (2007)
