중국 시민사회 담론 속의 ‘혁명 서사’ ― 2000년대 말 ‘산자이(山寨) 토론’을 중심으로
“Revolution Narrative” in the Discourse of Chinese Civil Society: Focused on “Shanzai” Debates in the Late 2000s
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This article, through an analysis of “Shanzai (山寨)” discussion in the late 2000s, reveals what function as a justification in Chinese civil society. The existing study did not pay attention to how the discussion proceeded, confusing the “Shanzai” as a discussion with “Shanzai” as a phenomenon. In other words, they did not pay attention to how the proponents of “Shanzai” expressed their own argument and how those who objected to “Shanzai” developed their claim. This paper shows that the “Shanzai” debaters, regardless of whether they support “Shanzai” or not, implicated and leaned against the "revolution narrative" in their arguments. By showing this “revolution narrative”, this paper suggests that “justification” in the discourse of Chinese civil society has a story structure. The “revolution narrative” functions as an important symbol or code of "justification" in the discourse of Chinese civil society.
Abstract
This article, through an analysis of “Shanzai (山寨)” discussion in the late 2000s, reveals what function as a justification in Chinese civil society. The existing study did not pay attention to how the discussion proceeded, confusing the “Shanzai” as a discussion with “Shanzai” as a phenomenon. In other words, they did not pay attention to how the proponents of “Shanzai” expressed their own argument and how those who objected to “Shanzai” developed their claim. This paper shows that the “Shanzai” debaters, regardless of whether they support “Shanzai” or not, implicated and leaned against the "revolution narrative" in their arguments. By showing this “revolution narrative”, this paper suggests that “justification” in the discourse of Chinese civil society has a story structure. The “revolution narrative” functions as an important symbol or code of "justification" in the discourse of Chinese civil society.
참고문헌 (33)
- 강려화, "중국 산자이 현상의 사회, 문화적 의미에 관한 연구", 디지털디자인학연구, 10(4), pp.209~218 (2010), 한국디지털디자인학회
- 고점복, "소비사회의 서사 전략- ‘身體寫作’과 ‘산자이(山寨)’의 경우", 중국학논총, (28), pp.205~226 (2010), 중국학연구소
- 김성국, "주류에 도전하는 풀뿌리 문화 : 산자이(山寨) 문화를 중심으로", 중국학연구, (57), pp.467~498 (2011), 중국학연구회
- 로버트 워드나우, "문화분석" (2015), 한울아카데미
- 막스 베버, "프로테스탄티즘의 윤리와 자본주의 정신" (1993), 문예출판사
- 미셀 푸코, "감시와 처벌" (2003), 나남출판
- 쑨거, "중국의 체온 : 중국 민중은 어떻게 살아가는가" (2016), 창비
- 원톄쥔, "백년의 급진" (2013), 돌베개
- 위화, "사람의 목소리는 빛보다 멀리 간다" (2012), 문학동네
- 이중희, "중국의 산자이 열풍과 지적재산권문제: 국가와 이해당사자", 아시아연구, 14(2), pp.165~188 (2011), 한국아시아학회
- 장호준, "중국의 모방 · 복제 관행과 지적재산권의 문화정치", 담론201, 16(1), pp.61~90 (2013), 한국사회역사학회
- 칼 맑스, "칼 맑스 프리드리히 엥겔스 저작 선집 제2권" (2007), 박종철 출판사
- 클리퍼드 기어츠, "문화의 해석" (1998), 까치글방
- 홍순도, "짝퉁전쟁: 짝퉁을 알면 경제가 보인다" (2010), 울림
- Alexander, Jeffrey, "Handbook of Sociology" (1988), SAGE
- Alexander, Jeffrey C., "The Discourse of American Civil Society: A New Proposal for Cultural Studies", Theory And Society, 22 (1993)
- Caplow, Theodore, "Rule Enforcement without Visible Means: Christmas Gift Giving in Middletown", American Journal of Sociology, 89 (1984)
- Douglas, Mary, "How Institutions Think" (1986), Syracuse University Press
- Pengfei, Zhang, "Shanzhai and Shenzhen", Solid-State Circuits Magazine, 1 (2009)
- Smith, Philip, "Codes and Conflict: Toward a theory of War as Ritual", Theory and Society, 20 (1991)
- Swidler, Ann, "Culture in Action: Symbols and Strategies", American Sociological Review, 51 (1986)
- Toumey, Chiristopher P., "Conjuring Science: Scientific Symbols and Cultural Meanings in American life" (1996), Rutgers University Press
- 阿甘, "山寨革命" (2009), 中信出版社
- "對“山寨”不能過於寬容"[URL]
- "不要將什麽都稱爲“山寨”"[URL]
- "我們不是座山雕文化, 而是井岡山文化"[URL]
- "實質是惡搞從“自欺”到“欺人”的山寨文化"[URL]
- "山寨流行何必喊打喊殺"[URL]
- "倪萍提案未提及封殺山寨文化建議立法扶植原創"[URL]
- "山寨精神不是平民精神而是流氓精神"[URL]
- "“和谐盛世”说“山寨”"[URL]
- "別誤解了山寨"[URL]
- "強烈反對惡俗的山寨產品"[URL]