중국현대문학연구에서의 ‘민족주의’ 문제와 왕더웨이의 ‘서정론’— 윤함구문학 연구사례를 중심으로
The ‘Nationalism’ in the Study of ‘the literature of occupied regions’ in China and ‘Lyricism’ of Wang Dewei
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study critically examined the consciousness of ‘nationalism’ penetrating the flow of Chinese contemporary literature research, focusing on the study of the literature of occupied regions in China. And I tried to explore the possibility of reconstructing ‘Aesthetics’ and ‘politics’ out of nationalism through Wang Dewei’s ‘lyricism’. In my view, the problem with Chinese literature research on the literature of occupied regions is that it tries to grasp all criticism and resistance of literary works from the point of view of ‘colonialism’. This overlooked the importance of the issue of ‘governmentality’ as a more general mechanism of oppression that existed both inside and outside the contemporary colonial space. On the other hand, Wang Dewei presents the link of ‘Enlightenment’, ‘Revolution’, and ‘Lyrics’ by modifying Li Zehou’s outline of the development process of modern Chinese history with the two concepts of ‘Enlightenment’, ‘Salvation’. What I noticed here was that Wang Dewei replaced Li Zehou’s ‘salvation’ with ‘revolution’ and that the concept of ‘lyricism’ was closely connected with ‘revolution’. His theoretical attempt overcomes the problems faced by the study of modern Chinese literature by escaping from ‘nationalism’ and highlighting the resistance of the people and intellectuals who resist the oppression of the times.
Abstract
This study critically examined the consciousness of ‘nationalism’ penetrating the flow of Chinese contemporary literature research, focusing on the study of the literature of occupied regions in China. And I tried to explore the possibility of reconstructing ‘Aesthetics’ and ‘politics’ out of nationalism through Wang Dewei’s ‘lyricism’. In my view, the problem with Chinese literature research on the literature of occupied regions is that it tries to grasp all criticism and resistance of literary works from the point of view of ‘colonialism’. This overlooked the importance of the issue of ‘governmentality’ as a more general mechanism of oppression that existed both inside and outside the contemporary colonial space. On the other hand, Wang Dewei presents the link of ‘Enlightenment’, ‘Revolution’, and ‘Lyrics’ by modifying Li Zehou’s outline of the development process of modern Chinese history with the two concepts of ‘Enlightenment’, ‘Salvation’. What I noticed here was that Wang Dewei replaced Li Zehou’s ‘salvation’ with ‘revolution’ and that the concept of ‘lyricism’ was closely connected with ‘revolution’. His theoretical attempt overcomes the problems faced by the study of modern Chinese literature by escaping from ‘nationalism’ and highlighting the resistance of the people and intellectuals who resist the oppression of the times.
참고문헌 (29)
- 강진웅, "푸코의 권력과 주체 ― 통치성과 윤리적 주체", 사회와역사(구 한국사회사학회논문집), (103), pp.401~423 (2014), 한국사회사학회
- 김장선, "만주문학 연구" (2009), 역락
- 노정은, "왕더웨이 「유정의 역사」에 대한 짧은 독해", 중국현대문학, (54), pp.179~210 (2010), 한국중국현대문학학회
- 동아시아 식민주의와 문학 -‘만주국’ 문단을 중심으로, "만주연구", 2016, 87~110, pp.만주학회, 10.22888[DOI]
- 리쩌허우, "중국현대사상사론" (2005), 한길사
- 미셸 푸코, "안전, 영토, 인구" (2011), 난장
- 졸고, "개혁개방 이후, 중국의 문학위기담론 연구", 박사, pp.2016
- 박민호, "‘방법으로서의’ 만주국", 중국현대문학, (97), pp.161~185 (2021), 한국중국현대문학학회[DOI]
- 박홍서, "자유주의 통치성의 출현과 인간안보: 인간안보에 대한 푸코주의적 접근", 국제정치논총, 52(3), pp.57~82 (2012), 한국국제정치학회
- 송가배, "일본군 점령하 중국현대문학(1931-1945)의 연구방법론 검토", 중국문학, 99, pp.179~202 (2019), 한국중국어문학회[DOI]
- 조영현, "사이노폰의 개념", 중국현대문학, (95), pp.443~464 (2020), 한국중국현대문학학회[DOI]
- 오노데라 시로, "중국 내셔널리즘 ― 민족과 애국의근현대사" (2020), 산지니
- 왕더웨이, "시노폰 담론, 중국문학" (2017), 학고방
- 고운선, "화와 이의 전변(華夷之變) — 화어계 연구의 새로운 시각", 중국현대문학, (95), pp.387~441 (2020), 한국중국현대문학학회[DOI]
- 이재현, "사이노폰 연구와 비판적 중국 연구", 중국사회과학논총, 3(2), pp.63~93 (2021), 성균중국연구소[DOI]
- 임춘성, "‘이중적 타자’의 ‘통합의 정치학’ ― 왕더웨이의 『시노폰 담론, 중국문학』을 읽고", 중국현대문학, (86), pp.343~356 (2018), 한국중국현대문학학회[DOI]
- 프래신짓트 두아라, "주권과 순수성" (2008), 나남
- 刘晓丽, "被遮蔽的文学图景―对1932-1945年东北地区作家群落的一种考察", 上海师范大学学报, 34(2) (2005)
- 刘晓丽, "伪满洲国文学 : 中国现代文学研究的补订", 华东师范大学学报, (5) (2006)
- 刘晓丽, "现代文学史上的失踪者—以伪满洲国文学何以进入文学史为例", 探索與爭鳴, (6) (2007)
- 刘晓丽, "“新满洲”的修辞――以伪满洲时期的『新满洲』杂志为中心的考察", 文艺理论研究, (1) (2013)
- 刘晓丽, "打开“新满洲”――宣传、事实、怀旧与审美", 山东社会科学, (1) (2015)
- 刘晓丽, "东亚殖民主义与文学―以伪满洲国文坛为中心的考察", 学术月刊, (10) (2015)
- 刘晓丽, "解殖性内在於殖民地文学", 探索與争鸣, (1) (2017)
- 贺桂梅, ""抒情传统"论述的文化政治及其启示", 汉语言文学研究, (3) (2017)
- 王德威, "被压抑的现代性―晚清小说新论" (2005), 北京大学出版社
- 王德威, "再论“启蒙”、“革命”―与“抒情”", 文艺争鸣, (10) (2018)
- 张毓茂, "要填补现代文学研究中的空白——以沦陷时期的东北文学为例", 中国现代文学研究丛刊, (4) (1983)
- Zhang Longxi, "A companion to Modern Chinese Literature" (2015), Wiley-Blackwell