녹지구조에 따른 경관 선호도
Landscape Preferences for Greenspace Structures
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
There is little information about appropriate greenspace structures to satisfy aesthetic function in Korea. The purpose of this study was to analyze Korean's aesthetic preferences for greenspace structures concerned with urban tree plantings of an areal type to explore desirable greenspace landscapes. The study considered 5 structural variables of greenspace which were species composition, tree density, tree size, vertical and horizontal structure, and tree layout pattern. A photo-questionnaire was prepared through color simulations of different landscape types for each structural variable. Preference responses of an interval-scale rating from 214 respondents were statistically analyzed between landscape types and between respondent groups. Respondents preferred greenspace landscapes with diverse tree species to single species, higher tree density to lower density, larger trees to many smaller trees, multilayered and grouped plantings to single-layered and sparse plantings, and informal pattern to formal pattern. These preferences tended to be relatively higher for educated specialist and student groups than for other generalist group. Thus, multilayered and dense plantings in natural pattern including larger trees of diverse species, which are similar to ecological plantings, are recommended to increase aesthetic function of greenspace.
Abstract
There is little information about appropriate greenspace structures to satisfy aesthetic function in Korea. The purpose of this study was to analyze Korean's aesthetic preferences for greenspace structures concerned with urban tree plantings of an areal type to explore desirable greenspace landscapes. The study considered 5 structural variables of greenspace which were species composition, tree density, tree size, vertical and horizontal structure, and tree layout pattern. A photo-questionnaire was prepared through color simulations of different landscape types for each structural variable. Preference responses of an interval-scale rating from 214 respondents were statistically analyzed between landscape types and between respondent groups. Respondents preferred greenspace landscapes with diverse tree species to single species, higher tree density to lower density, larger trees to many smaller trees, multilayered and grouped plantings to single-layered and sparse plantings, and informal pattern to formal pattern. These preferences tended to be relatively higher for educated specialist and student groups than for other generalist group. Thus, multilayered and dense plantings in natural pattern including larger trees of diverse species, which are similar to ecological plantings, are recommended to increase aesthetic function of greenspace.
참고문헌 (20)
- Cho W, "Planting of Urban Environmental Forest and Community Planting Area", Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture, 26, pp.70~82 (1998)
- Choi JY, "Water Quality Management for Ecological Restoration of Aquatic Environments: Focused on Management of Riparian Buffer Zone", Korean Journal of Environmental Biology, 20, pp.20~29 (2002)
- Measuring Landscape Aesthetics: The Scenic Beauty Estimation Method, "Daniel TC", USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Ranger Experiment Station, ~, pp.USDA Forest Service Research Paper RM-167 (1976)
- Daniel TC, "Scenic Beauty Estimation Model: Predicting Perceived Beauty of Forest Landscapes", National Conference on Applied Techniques for Analysis and Management of the Visual Resource (1979)
- David HA, "The Method of Paired Comparisons" (1988), Oxford University Press
- Gundersen VS, "Public Preferences for Forest Structures: A Review of Quantitative Surveys from Finland, Noway, and Sweden", Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 7, pp.241~258 (2008)
- The Benefits of Urban Trees, In Cooling Our Communities, "Huang J", U.S. Government Printing Office, 27~42, pp.Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory Report LBL-31587 (1992)
- Hull RB, "Measurement of Scenic Beauty: The Law of Comparative Judgement and Scenic Beauty Estimation Procedures", Forest Science, 30, pp.1084~1096 (1984)
- Im SB, "Visual Preferences in Enclosed Urban Spaces", Environment and Behavior, 16, pp.235~262 (1984)
- 조현길, "Riparian Forest Structures in Korea and Their Applications to Greenway Design", International Symposium on Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration, pp.221~244 (2009), 환경부, 한국환경기술진흥원, 수생태복원사업단
- 조현길, "열쾌적성과 에너지절약을 위한 녹지계획 전략 연구", 한국조경학회지, 38(3), pp.23~32 (2010), 한국조경학회
- Jo HK, "Energy Saving and Reduction of Atmospheric CO2 Concentration by, and Planning Guideline for Urban Greenspace", Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture, 27, pp.38~47 (2000)
- Lien JN, "Extension of Visual Quality Models for Urban Forests", Journal of Environmental Management, 22, pp.245~254 (1986)
- Miller RW, "Urban Forestry: Planning and Managing Urban Greenspaces" (1997), Prentice Hall
- 박은영, "환경친화적 완충녹지의 기준설정", 한국조경학회지, 32(2), pp.25~35 (2004), 한국조경학회
- Raedeke DAM, "Wildlife Habitat Design in Urban Forest Landscapes, In Urban Forest Landscapes: Integrating Multidisciplinary Perspectives", pp.139~149 (1995), University of Washington Press
- Saaty TL, "Decision Making for Leaders: The Analytic Hierarchy Process for Decisions in a Complex World" (1999), RWS Publications
- Schroeder HW, "Estimating Park Tree Density to Maximize Landscape Aesthetics", Journal of Environmental Management, 23, pp.325~333 (1986)
- Ulrich RS, "Natural versus Urban Scenes: Some Psychophysiological Effects", Environment and Behavior, 13, pp.523~556 (1981)
- Ulrich RS, "Human Responses to Vegetation and Landscapes", Landscape and Urban Planning, 13, pp.29~44 (1986)