Same Bed, Different Dreams: US-Chinese Power Competition Over the East Asian Seas
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper answers the causes of the security competition between the US and China in the East Asian Seas as the ultimate objective of the two great powers to achieve naval mastery in the region. This paper argues that economically and militarily, the incumbent global power, the US, and the challenging power regarding to economic and military power, China, are more likely to compete for their own national interests and security and so forth. It is notable that the level of US-Chinese security competition over the East Asian Seas has been changing. Security dilemma is changing into power competition and the competition is expected to intensify more and more. Thus, the East Asian Seas will be a contested zone for a while between the US and China with naval forces playing significant roles. All in all, the US has been attempting to contain China while China has been attempting to expand its maritime activities to avoid such containment. This is a typical one bed, different dreams phenomenon.
Abstract
This paper answers the causes of the security competition between the US and China in the East Asian Seas as the ultimate objective of the two great powers to achieve naval mastery in the region. This paper argues that economically and militarily, the incumbent global power, the US, and the challenging power regarding to economic and military power, China, are more likely to compete for their own national interests and security and so forth. It is notable that the level of US-Chinese security competition over the East Asian Seas has been changing. Security dilemma is changing into power competition and the competition is expected to intensify more and more. Thus, the East Asian Seas will be a contested zone for a while between the US and China with naval forces playing significant roles. All in all, the US has been attempting to contain China while China has been attempting to expand its maritime activities to avoid such containment. This is a typical one bed, different dreams phenomenon.
참고문헌 (53)
- Booth, Ken, "Navies and Foreign Policy" (1977), Crane, Russak & Company
- Brzezinski, Zbigniew, "Debate: Clash of the Titans", Foreign Policy, pp.45~50 (2005)
- "Principles of U.S. Engagement in the Asia-Pacific, testimony before the Subcommittee on East Asian and Pacific Affairs Senate Foreign Relations Committee" (2010)[URL]
- Campbell, Kurt, "New Battle Stations?", Foreign Affairs, 82(5) (2003)
- Carr, E. H., "The Twenty Years’ Crisis, 1919-1939" (1946), Macmillan
- Chen, Rosalie, "China Perceives America: Perspectives of international relations experts", Journal of Contemporary China, 12(34), pp.285~297 (2003)
- "China military build-up seems U.S.-focused: Mullen", Reuters, ~ (2009)
- Entering the Dragon’s Lair: Chinese Antiaccess Strategies and Their Implications for the United States, "Cliff, Roger", RAND Corporation, ~ (2007)
- Evera, Stephen Van, "Offense, Defense, and the Causes of War", International Security, 22, pp.5~43 (1998)
- Erickson, Andrew, "Assessing the New U.S. Maritime Strategy: A Window into Chinese Thinking", Naval War College Review, 61(4), pp.35~71 (2008)
- Friedberg, Aaron L., "A Contest for Supremacy: China, America, and the Struggle for Mastery in Asia" (2011), W.W. Norton & Company
- Friedman, Norman, "Globalization and Maritime Power" (2002), National Defense University Press
- Fukuyama, Francis, "The End of History and the Last Man" (1992), Free Press
- Gilpin, Robert, "War and Change in World Politics" (1981), Cambridge University Press
- Ikenberry, G. John, "Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Persistence of Postwar Order", International Security, 23(3), pp.43~78 (1998)
- Jan, Van Tol, "AirSea Battle: A Point-of-Departure Operational Concept", pp.20~21 (2010), Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments
- Jervis, Robert, "Perception and Misperception in International Politics" (1976), Princeton University Press
- Jervis, Robert, "Cooperation Under the Security Dilemma", World Politics, 30(2), pp.167~214 (1978)
- Kennedy, Paul M., "The Rise and Fall of British Naval Mastery" (1983), Macmillan
- Krauthammer, Charles, "The Unipolar Moment", Foreign Affairs, 70(1), pp.23~33 (1990)
- Kupchan, Charles A., "After Pax Americana: Benign Power, Regional Integration, and the Sources of Stable Multipolarity", International Security, 23(3), pp.43~78 (1998)
- Layne, Christopher, "The Unipolar Illusion: Why New Great Powers Will Rise", International Security, 17(4), pp.5~51 (1993)
- China’s Role in American Grand Strategy: Partner, Regional Power, or Great Power Rival?, In The Asia Pacific: A Region in Transition, "Layne, Christopher", Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies, ~ (2004)
- Levy, Jack S., "Balance of Power: Theory and Practice in the 21st Century", pp.29~51 (2004), Stanford University Press
- Lynn-Jones, Sean M., "Offense-Defense Theory and its Critics", Security Studies, 4, pp.660~691 (1995)
- Mastanduno, Michael, "Preserving the Unipolar Moment: Realist Theories and U.S. Grand Strategy after the Cold War", International Security, 21(4), pp.49~88 (1997)
- Mearsheimer, John J., "Back to the Future: Instability in Europe after the Cold War", International Security, 15(1), pp.5~56 (1990)
- Mearsheimer, John J., "The Tragedy of Great Power Politics" (2001), Norton & Com
- Morgenthau, Hans J., "Politics among Nations: the Struggle for Power and Peace" (1954), Alfred A. Knopf
- Nye, Joseph S. Jr, "Bound to Lead: The Changing Nature of American Power" (1990), Basic Books
- China Naval Modernization: Implications for U.S. Navy Capabilities Background and Issues for Congress, "O'Rourke, Ronald", CRS, ~ (2008)
- Posen, Barry R., "Command of the Commons: The Military Foundation of U. S. Hegemony", International Security, 28(1), pp.5~46 (2003)
- Ross, Robert S., "Balance of Power: Theory and Practice in the 21st Century", pp.267~304 (2004), Stanford University Press
- "A Realist Policy for Managing US-Chinese Competition. The Stanley Foundation Policy Analysis Brief(November 2005)" (2005)[URL]
- Saunders, Stephen, "Jane’s Fighting Ships 2009-2010" (2009), Jane’s Information Group
- Saunders, Stephen, "Jane’s Fighting Ships 2010-2011" (2010), Jane’s Information Group
- 신성호, "미국의 아시아 올인정책", 전략연구, 19(55), pp.153~186 (2012), 한국전략문제연구소[DOI]
- China’s Strategic Modernization: Implications for the United States, "Stokes, Mark A.", U.S. Army War College, Strategic Studies Institute, ~ (1999)
- The White House, "National Security Strategy", The White House, ~ (1995)
- Quadrennial Defense Review Report, "US DoD", DoD, ~ (1997)
- Waltz, Kenneth N., "Man, the State and War: A Theoretical Analysis", pp.1959
- Waltz, Kenneth N., "Theory of International Politics" (1979), Addison-Wesley
- Waltz, Kenneth N., "The Emerging Structure of International Politics", International Security, 18(2), pp.44~79 (1994)
- White, Hugh, "The China Choice: Why America Should Share Power" (2012), Blanc Inc
- Wohlforth, William C., "The Stability of a Unipolar World", International Security, 24(1), pp.5~41 (1999)
- Xu, Shiming, "Limited War: Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow", pp.417~444 (1988), National Defense Academy Publishing House
- Yoshihara, Toshi, "Red Star Over the Pacific: China’s Rise and the Challenge to U.S. Maritime Strategy" (2010), Naval Institute Press
- Zhang, Wenmu, "China’s Energy Security and Policy Choices", World Economics and Politics, (5) (2006)
- Bristow, Michae, "China white paper highlights US military ‘competition’", BBC News, ~ (2011)
- Callo, Joseph, "China’s Navy: Rising Threat: A global challenge to America", The New York Post, ~ (2011)
- Herschelman, Kerry, "China holds largest-ever naval exercise", Jane’s Defense Weekly, ~ (2013)
- Monahan, Andrew, "China Overtakes Japan as World’s No. 2 Economy", The Wall Street Journal, ~ (2011)
- "US-South Korea military drills, China opposes any military acts in exclusive economic zone without permission", Xinhua News Agency, ~ (2010)