Approaches to Standards Cooperation with ASEAN and the Relevance to Aid for Trade
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
One of the main goals of ASEAN to enhance connectivity and economic integration is to harmonize standards and regulations, and implement MRAs. Developed countries have been providing support to address challenges faced by ASEAN associated with the harmonization of standards and regulations. While there is a clear relationship between standards and development assistance to trade, the explicit relevance of standards to Aid for Trade (AfT) is under-explored. This study conducts a comparative analysis of the approaches that different countries adopt for standards cooperation with ASEAN. The purpose of this study is to examine how standards are utilized to support trade and development of ASEAN and how cooperation is positioned in the context of AfT. Cases of the EU, Germany, U.S., Australia, and South Korea are evaluated to investigate how major countries cooperate with ASEAN in the area of standardization. We found that standards cooperation approaches are geared towards the harmonization of standards and regulations, and capacity building. These measures are relevant to AfT in that they contribute to the achievement of trade related goals including trade facilitation and the reduction of technical barriers to trade, and thus corresponding to the AfT categories ‘trade policy and regulations’ and ‘productive capacity building’. Besides cooperation in traditional industries, initiatives on digital trade have emerged as a new area for cooperation that can promote ASEAN’s competitiveness in the new trade environment. This study contributes to the theoretical discussions on AfT, identifies practical challenges, and makes suggestions for future standards cooperation with ASEAN.
Abstract
One of the main goals of ASEAN to enhance connectivity and economic integration is to harmonize standards and regulations, and implement MRAs. Developed countries have been providing support to address challenges faced by ASEAN associated with the harmonization of standards and regulations. While there is a clear relationship between standards and development assistance to trade, the explicit relevance of standards to Aid for Trade (AfT) is under-explored. This study conducts a comparative analysis of the approaches that different countries adopt for standards cooperation with ASEAN. The purpose of this study is to examine how standards are utilized to support trade and development of ASEAN and how cooperation is positioned in the context of AfT. Cases of the EU, Germany, U.S., Australia, and South Korea are evaluated to investigate how major countries cooperate with ASEAN in the area of standardization. We found that standards cooperation approaches are geared towards the harmonization of standards and regulations, and capacity building. These measures are relevant to AfT in that they contribute to the achievement of trade related goals including trade facilitation and the reduction of technical barriers to trade, and thus corresponding to the AfT categories ‘trade policy and regulations’ and ‘productive capacity building’. Besides cooperation in traditional industries, initiatives on digital trade have emerged as a new area for cooperation that can promote ASEAN’s competitiveness in the new trade environment. This study contributes to the theoretical discussions on AfT, identifies practical challenges, and makes suggestions for future standards cooperation with ASEAN.
참고문헌 (45)
- Choung, J. -Y., "Catch-up in ICT standards: Policy, implementation and standards-setting in South Korea", Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(4), pp.771~788 (2012)
- Gao, P, "Government in the catching-up of technology innovation: Case of administrative intervention in China", Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 96, pp.4~14 (2015)
- Jachia, L., "Aid for Trade: Global and Regional Perspectives", pp.99~122 (2009), Springer
- Jansen, M., "Developing countries, standards and the WTO", The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 19(1), pp.163~185 (2010)
- 김준엽, "UN 지속가능개발목표(SDGs)와 표준의 기여와 역할", 국제개발협력연구, 10(3), pp.3~19 (2018), 국제개발협력학회[DOI]
- Maertens, M., "Trade, Standards, and Poverty:Evidence from Senegal", World Development, 37(1), pp.161~178 (2009)
- Mergenthaler, M., "Quality assurance programs and access to international markets: the case of horticultural processors in Vietnam", Supply Chain Management, 14(5), pp.359~368 (2009)
- OECD, "Aid for Trade at a Glance 2019: Economic Diversification and Empowerment" (2019), OECD Publishing
- Wang, P., "The latecomer strategy for global ICT standardization: Indigenous innovation and its dilemma", Telecommunications Policy, 38(10), pp.933~943 (2014)
- Yin, R. K., "Case Study Research: Design and Methods" (2009), SAGE Publications
- Zoo, H., "Interplay of innovation and standardization:Exploring the relevance in developing countries", Technological Forecastin and Social Change, 118, pp.334~348 (2017)
- 주한나, "무역원조를 통한 개발도상국 대상 표준 협력: EU 및 미국의 사례와 한국에 주는 함의", 국가정책연구, 28(3), pp.27~52 (2014), 국가정책연구소[DOI]
- Overall Work Plan: ASEAN Regional Integration Support by the European Union - (ARISE) Plus, "ARISE Plus", ~ (2018)
- Third Six-Monthly Progress Report: ASEAN Regional Integration Support by the European Union - (ARISE) Plus, "ARISE Plus", ~ (2019)
- Fourth Six-Monthly Progress Report: ASEAN Regional Integration Support by the European Union - (ARISE) Plus, "ARISE Plus", ~ (2020)
- ASEAN, "ASEAN Economic Community Blueprint 2025", The ASEAN Secretariat, ~ (2015)
- Master Plan on ASEAN Connectivity 2025, "ASEAN", The ASEAN Secretariat, ~ (2016)
- ASEAN, "ASEAN Digital Integration Framework", ~ (2019)
- ASEAN Integration Report 2019, "ASEAN", The ASEAN Secretariat, ~ (2019)
- European Commission, "Project Cycle Management Guidelines Volume 1", ~ (2004)
- EU Delegation, "EU-ASEAN: Natural Partners", ~ (2013)
- ISO, "IEC JTC 1 Strategic Business Plan", ISO, 2020
- JISC, "Collaborations between Japan and ASEAN", ~ (2019)
- KSA, "Current Status of ISCP In-depth Projects", Presented at the 2016ISCP Asia Regional Forum (2016)
- 한국 ODA의 프로그램형 접근법(PBA)도입방안 - KOICA의 전략과 과제, "Lee, H. J.", Korea International Cooperation Agency, ~ (2010)
- MOFA(Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan), "Partnership for Quality Infrastructure - Investment for Asia’s Future", ~ (2015)
- External evaluation - Short report:Improving Quality Infrastructure in ASEAN, "Müller, R.", Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt, ~ (2018)
- Prassetya, R., "AEC Blueprint Implementation Performance and Challenges: Standards and Conformance", Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia, ~ (2015)
- PTB, "Strengthening Quality Infrastructure in ASEAN", ~
- PTB, "Improving Quality Infrastructure in ASEAN", ~
- Scoles, S. D., "Harmonization of Standards and Mutual Recognition Agreements on Conformity Assessment in Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand, and Viet Nam", Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia, ~ (2015)
- Standards Australia, "Accelerating Digital Trade: Prospects for Closer ASEAN and Australia Standards Cooperation and Collaboration", An Issues Paper for the 2018 ASEAN-Australia Digital Trade Standards Workshop (2018)
- ASEAN - Australia Digital Trade Standards Cooperation Initiative – Recommendations Report, "Standards Australia", ~ (2018)
- ASEAN - Australia Digital Trade Standards Initiative - Workshop 1 2019: Workshop Report, "Standards Australia", ~ (2019)
- USAID, "Activity Fact Sheet: U.S.-ASEAN Connectivity through Trade and Investment (ACTI)", ~ (2015)
- USAID, "Expanding the ASEAN Digital Economy", ~ (2019)
- USAID, "Trusted Data Flows to Enable Digital Trade", ~ (2019)
- USAID, "Promoting Inclusive Growth through Innovation, Trade And E-Commerce", ~ (2020)
- Standards and Technical Regulations and Firms in Developing Countries: New Evidence from a World Bank Technical Barriers to Trade Survey, "Wilson, J.", The World Bank, ~ (2004)
- "Australia and ASEAN driving digital trade" (2018)[URL]
- "Standards in the South-East Asian food trade"[URL]
- "Capacity Building for Conformity Assessment for Information Technology Equipment (ITE) in ASEAN Member States"[URL]
- "ASEAN-Australia Digital Trade Standards Initiative"[URL]
- "Trade Capacity Building Resource Guide – Interactive Web Tool" (2017)[URL]
- "“Ministerial Declaration.” § Paragraph 57" (2005)[URL]