본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

How Animacy and Agenthood Influence Argument Order in the Translation of English Passive Constructions to Korean

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류통역번역학

초록

The Animate First Principle (AFP), which states that an animate argument must appear first in a sentence, has been observed in a large number of human languages and is asserted by many researchers to hold true in the specific instance of the Korean language. This study utilized a translation experiment with 56 Korean ESL students at a Korean university in an effort to understand how animacy and agenthood affect the translation of English into Korean. More specifically, it investigates how variations in animacy and argument is animate in the original English sentence. Thus, the findings support the AFP but needs to be amended to an Animate Agent Firstructure influence the choice of voice, either active or passive, in the Korean translation. The results lead to the conclusion that passive constructions following a word-by-word translation are not preferred in all circumstances and are only strongly avoided when the agent st Principle when it comes to the choice of voice.

Abstract

The Animate First Principle (AFP), which states that an animate argument must appear first in a sentence, has been observed in a large number of human languages and is asserted by many researchers to hold true in the specific instance of the Korean language. This study utilized a translation experiment with 56 Korean ESL students at a Korean university in an effort to understand how animacy and agenthood affect the translation of English into Korean. More specifically, it investigates how variations in animacy and argument structure influence the choice of voice, either active or passive, in the Korean translation. The results lead to the conclusion that passive constructions following a word-by-word translation are not preferred in all circumstances and are only strongly avoided when the agent is animate in the original English sentence. Thus, the findings support the AFP but needs to be amended to an Animate Agent First Principle when it comes to the choice of voice.

참고문헌 (28)

  1. Bock, J., "Conceptual Accessibility and Syntacticstructure in Sentence Formulation", Cognition, pp.47~67 (1985)
  2. Bresnan, J., "Predicting the Dative Alternation, In Cognitive Foundations and Interpretations", pp.69~94 (2007), KNAW
  3. Comrie, B., "Language Universals and Typology" (1989), University of Chicago Press
  4. Croft, W., "Modern Syntactic Typology, In Approaches to Language Typology", pp.85~144 (1995), Clarendon Press
  5. Dahl, O., "Animacy in Grammar and Discourse, In Reference and Referent Accessibility", pp.47~64 (1996), John Benjamins Publishing Company
  6. Folli, R., "Teleology and Animacy in External Arguments", Lingua, 118, pp.190~202 (2008)
  7. Hale, K., "On Argument Structure and the Lexical Expression of Syntactic Relations, In The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor Sylvain Bromberger", pp.111~176 (1993), MIT Press
  8. Hale, K., "Prolegomenon to a Theory of Argument Structure" (2002), MIT Press
  9. Higginbotham, J., "Location and Causation" (1997), University of Oxford
  10. Hinkel, E., "Why English Passive is Difficult to Teach (and Learn), In New Perspectives on Grammar Teaching in Second Language Classrooms", pp.233~259 (2002), Lawrence
  11. Hong, K., "The Passive Construction and Case in Korean", Proceedings of the 17th Annual Meeting of the Berkley Linguistics Society: General Session and Parasession on the Grammar of Event Structure, pp.130~143 (1991)
  12. Ihm, H., "Korean Grammar for International Learners" (2011), Yonsei University Press
  13. Ju, M., "Overpassivization Errors by Second Language Learners: The Effect of Conceptualizable Agents in Discourse", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, pp.85~111 (2000)
  14. Kempen, G., "A Corpus Study into Word Order Variation in German Subordinate Clauses: Animace Affects Linearization Independently of Grammatical Function Assignment, In Multidisciplinary Approaches to Language Production", pp.173~181 (2004), Mouton de Gruyter
  15. Kim, H., "Continuity of Action and Topic in Discourse, In Japanese and Korean Linguistics", pp.79~96 (1990), Center for Study of Language and Information
  16. Kuno, S., "The Structure of the Japanese Language" (1973), MIT Press
  17. van Nice, K., "Task Sensitivity of Animacy Effects: Evidence from German Picture Descriptions", Linguistics, 41, pp.825~849 (2003)
  18. Øverlid, L., "Disambiguation of Grammatical Functions in Norwegian: Modeling Variation in Word Order Inerpretations Conditioned by Animacy and Diefinitess", 20th Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics (2004), University of Helsinki Publications
  19. Pae, H., "Animacy Effect and Language Specificity: Judgment of Unaccusative Verbs by Korean Learners of English as a Foreign Language", J Psycholinguist Res
  20. Palmer, F., "Grammatical Roles and Relations" (1994), Cambridge University Press
  21. Renkema, J., "Schrijfwijzer" (2002), SDU
  22. Sang, H., "Causative Constructions and Animacy Configurations" (2004), Arbeitspaper
  23. Shridhar, S., "Cognition and Sentence Production: A Cross-Linguistic Study" (1988), Springer-Verlag
  24. Song, S., "Type Hierarchies for Passive Form in Korean", Proceedings of the HPSG07 Conference (2007)
  25. de Swart, P., "Animacy, Argument Structure, and Argument Encoding", Lingua, 118, pp.131~140 (2008)
  26. Tanaka, M., "Conceptual Influences on Word Order and Voice in Sentence Production: Evidence from Japanese", Journal of Memory and Language, 65, pp.318~330 (2011)
  27. Tomlin, R., "Basic Word Order : Functional Principles" (1986), Croom Helm
  28. van Valin, R., "Syntax: Structure,Meaning, and Function" (1997), Cambridge University Press

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)