Jakobson’s Translation Typology Revisited: Situated Cognition and Its Translative Nature
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This research aims to scrutinize the intrinsic nature of translation per se and the role of situated cognition in transdisciplinarily examining Jakobson’s translation typology (1959/2004). With the fundamentally and intrinsically translativity-centered and cognition-sensitive—thus, global-biosemiosis-based—perspective(s) employed in order to develop and rethink the paradigm of translation per se (Lim 2014b), this paper proposes to revisit the Jakobsonian tripartite taxonomy in a centripetally (trans-) semiotic way, especially and significantly, by considering the translative nature of the sign (Petrilli 2003) and the experiential situatedness of the translatorial paradigm (Lim 2013a). In employing the (intra-/ inter-/ trans-) corporeally interpretive (thus, situated embodiment-/ enactment-sensitive) cognitivist approach (Lim 2013a, 2014b) and analyzing the sociohistorical and linguisticocultural aspects of Jakobson’s personal experiences accordingly, it argues that the specific notions of (meta) translation and translatoriality should be viewed as diverse kinds of corporeal translation products (that is, target texts) of the theorist’s situated cognition that is based on and/ or sensitive to the then explicit activities, processes (or procedures), and phenomena of translation. In the actual translative cognitivist analysis of Jakobson’s pre-1959 life experiences, a reliable and substantial list of information comes to support—if not prove—the research’s main hypothesis that the Jakobsonian typology is not the meta translation theory made via a purely scientific investigation but, rather, Jakobson’s translatoriality-sensitive conceptual translation on the notion of translation (proper) heavily and multidimensionally influenced by his own bodily experiences situated in certain specific historicities. Finally, it concludes that, with Petrilli’s (2003) paradigm of the sign as the translative process (and vice versa) taken into consideration, (a) situated cognition—as the unique transcorporeal and transsemiotic dynamics of the respective (bio-) translator himself/ herself—helps fathom what translation is and does across various borders; (b) the transdiciplinary follow-up research on translativity and translatoriality on a larger scale of the biosemiosphere is needed and, also, will be helpful (cf. Lim 2013a); (c) the Jakobsonian translation typology now needs and calls for a new(er) understanding.
Abstract
This research aims to scrutinize the intrinsic nature of translation per se and the role of situated cognition in transdisciplinarily examining Jakobson’s translation typology (1959/2004). With the fundamentally and intrinsically translativity-centered and cognition-sensitive—thus, global-biosemiosis-based—perspective(s) employed in order to develop and rethink the paradigm of translation per se (Lim 2014b), this paper proposes to revisit the Jakobsonian tripartite taxonomy in a centripetally (trans-) semiotic way, especially and significantly, by considering the translative nature of the sign (Petrilli 2003) and the experiential situatedness of the translatorial paradigm (Lim 2013a). In employing the (intra-/ inter-/ trans-) corporeally interpretive (thus, situated embodiment-/ enactment-sensitive) cognitivist approach (Lim 2013a, 2014b) and analyzing the sociohistorical and linguisticocultural aspects of Jakobson’s personal experiences accordingly, it argues that the specific notions of (meta) translation and translatoriality should be viewed as diverse kinds of corporeal translation products (that is, target texts) of the theorist’s situated cognition that is based on and/ or sensitive to the then explicit activities, processes (or procedures), and phenomena of translation. In the actual translative cognitivist analysis of Jakobson’s pre-1959 life experiences, a reliable and substantial list of information comes to support—if not prove—the research’s main hypothesis that the Jakobsonian typology is not the meta translation theory made via a purely scientific investigation but, rather, Jakobson’s translatoriality-sensitive conceptual translation on the notion of translation (proper) heavily and multidimensionally influenced by his own bodily experiences situated in certain specific historicities. Finally, it concludes that, with Petrilli’s (2003) paradigm of the sign as the translative process (and vice versa) taken into consideration, (a) situated cognition—as the unique transcorporeal and transsemiotic dynamics of the respective (bio-) translator himself/ herself—helps fathom what translation is and does across various borders; (b) the transdiciplinary follow-up research on translativity and translatoriality on a larger scale of the biosemiosphere is needed and, also, will be helpful (cf. Lim 2013a); (c) the Jakobsonian translation typology now needs and calls for a new(er) understanding.
참고문헌 (49)
- Allan, Keith, "The Oxford Handbook of the History of Linguistics" (2013), Oxford U P
- Boeckx, Cedric, "The Cambridge Handbook of Biolinguistics" (2013), Cambridge U P
- Bradford, Richard, "Roman Jakobson: Life, Language and Art" (1994), Routledge
- Brown, Ann, "Metacognition, Motivation, and Understanding", pp.65~116 (1987), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
- Cassedy, Steven, "Flight from Eden: The Origins of Modern Literary Criticism and Theory" (1990), The Regents of U of California
- Chomsky, Noam, "Language and Thought" (1994), Moyer Bell
- Chomsky, Noam, "Three Factors in Language Design", Linguistic Inquiry, 36(1), pp.1~22 (2005)
- Cobley, Paul, "Semiotics Continues to Astonish: Thomas A. Sebeok and the Doctrine of Signs" (2011), De Gruyter Mouton
- Deacon, Terrence, "The Symbolic Species: The Co-evolution of Language and the Brain" (1997), W. W. Norton and Company
- Eco, Umberto, "Experiences in Translation" (2008), U of Toronto P
- Flavell, John, "The Nature of Intelligence", pp.231~235 (1976), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
- Gorlée, Dinda, "Semiotics and the Problem of Translation: With Special Reference to the Semiotics of Charles S. Peirce" (1994), Rodopi
- Grégoire, Henri, "La Geste du Prince Igor (Annuaire de l’Institut de Philologie et d’Histoires Orientales et Slaves VIII)" (1948), IPHOS
- Hatim, Basil, "Translation: An Advanced Resource Book" (2004), Routledge
- Jakobson, Roman, "Novesjšaja Russkaja Poèzija (New Russian Poetry)" (1921), Tipografiia Polikita v Prage
- Jakobson, Roman, "Remarques sur l’Evolution Phonologique de Russ Comparée à Celle des Autres Langues Slaves" (1929), Jednota Ceskoslovenskych Matematiku a Fysiku
- Jakobson, Roman, "Über den Versban der Serbokroatischen Volksepen", 박사, pp.1930
- Jakobson, Roman, "Kindersprache, Aphasie und Allgemeine Lautgesetze" (1941), Suhrkamp
- Jakobson, Roman, "On Translation", pp.232~239 (2004), Harvard U P
- Jakobson, Roman, "Fundamentals of Language" (1956), Mouton
- Jenkins, Lyle, "The Cambridge Handbook of Biolinguistics", pp.4~11 (2013), Cambridge U P
- Kluwe, Rainer, "Human Mind—Animal Mind", pp.201~224 (1982), Springer
- Koerner, Konrad, "Concise History of The Language Sciences: From the Sumerians to the Cognitivists" (1995), Elsevier Science
- Kuhiwczak, Piotr, "A Companion to Translation Studies" (2007), Multilingual Matters
- Lee, Geun-Hee, "이근희의 번역산책: 번역투에서 번역의 전략까지" (2005), Hankookmunhwasa
- 임동휘, "번역에 대한 메타번역적 접근: 기호, 인지 중심의 번역 개념", 코기토, 76, pp.299~338 (2014), 인문학연구소
- Lim, Dhonghui, "‘Are Existence and Possession (In)alienable?: A Baby-Mother Experience as the Proto-Gestalt of Possession (an updated version)", The Proceedings of The 12th World Congress of the IASS (The International Association for Semiotic Studies) (2014), IASS
- Lim, Dhonghui, "King Sejong’s and Koreans’ Translatoriality in Korean: The Transcorporeal Semiosis Translated into Languages", The Proceedings of The 12th World Congress of the IASS (The International Association for Semiotic Studies) (2014), IASS
- Lim, Eo Kyung, "Semiotic Translations of Possession: Multidimensionality of Its Embodiment", 박사, pp.2013
- Lim, Eo Kyung, "What Is TRANSLATION?: The Core of Semiosis, Cognition, and Human Sciences", The Proceedings of The NKA (The New Korean Journal of English Language and Literature) 2014 Spring Conference (2014), Pukyung University
- "Guide to the Papers of Roman Jakobson" (2014)[URL]
- Munday, Jeremy, "Introducing Translation Studies: Theories and Applications" (2012), Routledge
- Nelson, Thomas, "The Psychology of Learning and Motivation", pp.125~141 (1990), Academic Press
- Nelson, Thomas, "Metacognition: Knowing about Knowing", pp.1~25 (1994), The MIT P
- Peirce, Charles, "Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce" (1958), Harvard U P
- Perfect, Timothy, "Applied Metacognition" (2002), Cambridge U P
- Petrilli, Susan, "Translation Translation" (2003), Rodopi
- Petrilli, Susan, "Semiotics Unbounded: Interpretive Routes through the Open Network of Signs" (2005), U of Toronto P
- Purves, Dale, "Principles of Cognitive Neuroscience" (2008), Sinauer Associates
- Ricoeur, Paul, "Sur La Traduction" (2004), Bayard
- Robbins, Philip, "The Cambridge Handbook of Situated Cognition" (2009), Cambridge U P
- Rudy, Stephen, "Roman Jakobson, 1896-1982: A Complete Bibliography of His Writings" (1990), Mouton de Gruyter
- Ruthrof, Horst, "The Body in Language" (2000), Cassell
- Schneider, Wolfgang, "Applied Metacognition", pp.224~257 (2002), Cambridge U P
- Sebeok, Thomas, "The Semiotic Web: A Chronicle of Prejudices", Bulletin of Literary Semiotics, 2, pp.1~63 (1975)
- Sebeok, Thomas, "Global Semiotics" (2001), Indiana U P
- Snow, Charles, "The Two Cultures" (2001), Cambridge U P
- Steiner, George, "After Babel: Aspects of Language and Translation" (1998), Oxford U P
- Yun, Sungwoo, "번역론: 번역에 관한 철학적 성찰" (2006), Cheolhakgwa Hyunsilsa