ADR의 선택에 관한 연구 - 무역클레임을 중심으로 -
A Study on the Selection of ADR - Focused on International Trade Claim -
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
To solve trade claims, this research reviewed the essence and characteristics of ADR which companies utilize domestically, and by analyzing the utilization conditions, proposed the following plan for effective utilization of ADR in case trade claim breaks out. First, the disputed party shall select ADR type suitable for themselves by making overall considerations such as the financial condition of their own company, necessity of confidentiality and urgency of dispute resolution etc after reviewing sustained necessity of business relation with the other party. Second, if dispute amount is small, mediation is more useful than arbitration. Third, if control right on trade claim solution procedure and results is desired, mediation is useful, and if trade claim solution procedure and results wish to be committed to third party, arbitration is useful. Fourth, mediation is useful for cases where dispute parties desire to solve dispute on the basis of business interest relations rather than strict legal responsibility and obligation. Finally, to persuade the concerned party directly, select mediation, and if persuasion of third party is determined more beneficial to you, select arbitration.
Abstract
To solve trade claims, this research reviewed the essence and characteristics of ADR which companies utilize domestically, and by analyzing the utilization conditions, proposed the following plan for effective utilization of ADR in case trade claim breaks out. First, the disputed party shall select ADR type suitable for themselves by making overall considerations such as the financial condition of their own company, necessity of confidentiality and urgency of dispute resolution etc after reviewing sustained necessity of business relation with the other party. Second, if dispute amount is small, mediation is more useful than arbitration. Third, if control right on trade claim solution procedure and results is desired, mediation is useful, and if trade claim solution procedure and results wish to be committed to third party, arbitration is useful. Fourth, mediation is useful for cases where dispute parties desire to solve dispute on the basis of business interest relations rather than strict legal responsibility and obligation. Finally, to persuade the concerned party directly, select mediation, and if persuasion of third party is determined more beneficial to you, select arbitration.
참고문헌 (47)
- 강이수, "국제거래분쟁론" (2002), 삼영사
- 강현중, "?민사소송법?" (2004), 박영사
- 고학수, "중재를 통한 국제계약상의 분쟁해결", 인권과 정의, (332) (2004), 대한변호사협회
- 곽노성, "?국제협상론?" (1999), 경문사
- 김경배, "대체적 분쟁해결제도의 활성화 방안에 관한 고찰", 중재연구, 12(1) (2002), 한국중재학회
- 김용진, "?민사소송법?" (2006), 삼영사
- 김원배, "대중국의 무역분쟁에 관한 연구 : 2003년도 한국무역학회 국제학술발표대회 발표논문집", 2003년도 한국무역학회 국제학술발표대회 (2003), 한국무역학회
- 김종권, "한국의 ADR에 관한 소고 : 2004년 안전경영과학회 추계학술대회 발표논문집", 2004년 안전경영과학회 추계학술대회 (2004), 안전경영과학회
- 김홍규, "?민사소송법?" (2008), 삼영사
- 대한상사중재원, "계간 중재" (2008)
- "무역분쟁조정", 대한상사중재원[URL]
- "알선이란", 대한상사중재원[URL]
- "중재를 통한 분쟁해결", 대한상사중재원[URL]
- 목영준, "?상사중재법론?" (2000), 박영사
- 사득환, "환경갈둥과 대체적 분쟁해결장치 : 인식과 대안", 환경정책, 6(2) (1998)
- 사법연수원, "?ADR?" (2000), 사법연수원
- 송상현, "소송에 갈음하는 분쟁해결방안의 이념과 전망", 민사판례연구, 14 (1993), 박영사
- 송상현, "?민사소송법?" (2008), 박영사
- 신군재, "무역분쟁의 해결수단으로서 ADR 활성화 방안에 관한 연구", 무역상무연구, 20 (2003), 한국무역상무학회
- 안순철, "대안적 분쟁해결(ADR)의 이론과 실제", 분쟁해결연구, 1(1) (2003), 단국대학교 분쟁해결연구소
- 오세창, "국제상거래론" (2003), 삼영사
- "대한민국다자조약정보", 외교통상부[URL]
- 우동기, "환경분쟁해결을 위한 대안적 분쟁해결제도 도입에 관한 기초연구", 협상연구, 5(2) (1999), 한국협상학회
- 유성근, "ADR와 상사중재", 중재, 207, pp.4~13 (1989), 대한상사중재원
- 이동률, "대체적 분쟁해결제도에 관한 연구", 사회과학연구, 13 (2000), 건국대학교 사회과학연구소
- 이시윤, "?민사소송법?" (2008), 박영사
- 이주원, "한국조정제도의 발전방향", 중재연구, 12(1) (2002), 한국중재학회
- 전병서, "민사소송법강의" (2003), 법문사
- 전병서, "대체적 분쟁해결제도(ADR)의 방향", 변호사, 32 (2002)
- 정동윤, "?민사소송법?" (2007), 법문사
- 정헌주, "ADR의 활성화 방안에 관한 연구", 통상연구, 5(1) (2001), 경희대학교 무역연구소
- 최장호, "우리나라기업의 상사분쟁관리와 ADR에 관한 연구", 중재연구, 13(2) (2004)
- 한국무역협회?대한상사중재원, "2006년도 무역클레임 실태조사 보고서"
- 한국무역협회, "수출입실무메뉴얼" (1998)
- 한국무역협회, "?수출입절차 해설?" (1985)
- 허 만, "미국에서의 사법재판에 의하지 아니한 분쟁해결", 민사판례연구, 14 (1993), 박영사
- 호문혁, "?민사소송법?" (2008), 법문사
- 小島武司, "裁判外紛爭處理法" (1998), 有斐閣
- "What is Mediation?"[URL]
- Carnevale, David G., "Root Dynamics of Alternative Dispute Resolution : An Illustrative Case in the U.5. Postal Service", Public Administrative Review, 53(5) (1993), No5
- Coddington, Alan, "A Theory of the Bargaining Process : Comment Reply", American Economic Review, 56(3) (1966)
- Coulson, Robert, "Professional Mediation of Civil Disputes" (1984), American Arbitration Association
- "Why ADR"[URL]
- Lewicki, Roy J., "Essentials of negotiation", pp.2001, Irwin
- Mackie, Karl J., "A handbook of Dispute Resolution: ADR in Action" (1991), Routledge
- Moore, Christopher W., "Negotiation : Readings, Exercises and Cases" (1993), Irwin Inc.
- Nolan-Haley, "Alternative Dispute Resolution in anutshell" (1992), West publishing Co.