분쟁해결수단 선택에 관한 소고 - 국제상사중재를 중심으로 -
A Study on the Choice of Dispute Resolution Method: Focusing on Arbitration
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
계약의 불이행으로 분쟁이 발생할 경우 이를 어떤 방식으로 해결하는가는 계약분쟁당사자들에게 중요한 의사결정사항이 된다. 특히, 이러한 분쟁이 국제적으로 발생한다면 다양한 분쟁수단을 고려할 수 있다. 본 연구는 서로 다른 법원의 판결 성향이 존재하는 상황에서 국제적 분쟁해결수단이 선택되는 의사결정과정에 대한 분석모형을 제시한다. 특히, 모형에서는 특정 분쟁당사자가 소속된 사회 또는 법률적 제도에 대한 정보가 상대 당사자에게는 불완전한 정보가 될 수 있고이러한 비대칭적 정보상황이 기회주의적인 행동을 유발시켜 분쟁해결수단에 대한 선택이 달라질 수 있음을 보여주었다. 이는 Hylton(2000)이 제시한 억제편익(deterence benefit) 개념을 응용하여 제시되었는데, 특별히 법원의 판결속성을 억제편익 도출과정에서 내생화함으로써 이러한 비대칭 정보 문제를 모형 안에서 고려한 결과이다. 따라서 본 연구가 제시하는 분석모형은 국제상사분쟁과정에서 국제상사중재를 분쟁수단으로 선택하는 과정에 대한 깊이 있는 이해를 가능하게 한다.
Abstract
When a dispute arises due to non-fulfillment of the contract, how to resolve such dispute is one of the important decision-making matters. In particular, if such disputes occur internationally, various methods of dispute resolution exist. This study presented a model for the decision-making process that selects a dispute resolution method in a situation where different courts have different judgment tendencies. In particular, it has been shown that information on the country or social system to which a particular party in a dispute belongs can be incomplete information to the other party, and this asymmetric information situation causes opportunism, which can change the choice of methods of dispute resolution. Such a process was suggested through the calculation of deterrence benefits suggested by Hylton(2000), and the model was modified to include the problem of asymmetric information, especially since the court judgment attributes were endogenized in the calculation process of deterrence benefits. Therefore, the model presented in this study enables an in-depth understanding of the process of selecting international commercial arbitration as a means of dispute in the course of international commercial disputes.
참고문헌 (14)
- 법무부, "우리 기업을 위한 국제중재 가이드 2013" (2013), 법무부 국제법무과
- Van Aaken, Anne, "The Oxford Handbook of International Arbitration" (2020), Oxford University Press
- Anderson, James, "Insecurity and the Pattern of Trade:An Empirical Investigation", The Review of Economics and Statistics, 84(2), pp.342~352 (2002)
- Bühring-Uhle, Christian, "Towards a science of international arbitration: Collected empirical research", pp.25~14 (2005), Kluwer Law International
- Drahozal, Charles, "Why do businesses use (or not use)arbitraton clauses", Ohio State journal on Dispute Resolution, 25(2), pp.433~476 (2010)
- Ginsburg, Tom, "International Substitutes for Domestic Institutions:Bilateral Investment Treaties and Governance", International Review of Law and Economics, 25, pp.107~123 (2005)
- Hylton, Keith, "Agreements to waive or to arbitrate legal claims: an economic analysis", Supreme Court Economic Review, 8, pp.209~263 (2000)
- Hylton, Keith, "The Economics of Litigation and Arbitration:An Application to Franchise Contracts", The Journal of Legal Studies, 32(2), pp.549~584 (2003)
- International Chamber of Commerce, "ICC Dispute Resolution 2020 Statistics" (2021), International Chamber of Commerce
- Lee, Yoon-Ho, "The Priest-Klein Hypothesis:Proofs and Generality", International Review of Law and Economics, 48(C), pp.59~76 (2016)
- Mattli, Walter, "Private Justice in a Global Economy:From Litigaton to Arbitration", International Organization, 55(4), pp.919~947 (2001)
- Myburgh, Andrew, "Does International Commercial Arbitration Promote Foreign Direct Investment?", Journal of Law and Economics, 59(3), pp.597~627 (2016)
- Naimark, Richard, "International Private Commercial Arbitration:Expectations and Perceptions of Attroneys and Business People:A Forced-Rank Analysis", International Business Lawyer, 30(5), pp.203~209 (2002)
- Priest, George, "The Selection of Disputes for Litigation", The Journal of Legal Studies, 13(1), pp.1~55 (1984)