헌법불합치결정에 따른 입법개선의무의 이행현황 분석과 비판
A analysis of legal amendment by a decision of constitutional nonconformity
0
조회
0
다운로드
20
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
A decision of constitutional nonconformity is a kind of unconstitutional decision that the Constitutional Court rules. This decision is called "Unvereinbarerklälung" in Germany. This decision means the Constitutional Court acknowledges a law's unconstitutionality but merely requests the National Assembly to revise it by a certain period while having the law remain effective until that time. As mentioned above, this decision requests the National Assembly to revise it by a certain period. So legal amendment is very important in order that this decision keeps its effectiveness. But the type of decision of constitutional nonconformity is various - by application of the provision and establishment of the legal deadline. A decision of nonconformity devides into prohibiting a provision of constitutional nonconformity and applicating the provision. So a analysis of legal amendment by a decision of constitutional nonconformity depends on the type of decision of constitutional nonconformity. In order to survey whether legal amendment reflect a decision of Constitutional Court, this analysis considers whether the legal amendment follows the established legal deadline, reflects the decision of Constitutional Court and prescribes a retroactive provision.
Abstract
A decision of constitutional nonconformity is a kind of unconstitutional decision that the Constitutional Court rules. This decision is called "Unvereinbarerklälung" in Germany. This decision means the Constitutional Court acknowledges a law's unconstitutionality but merely requests the National Assembly to revise it by a certain period while having the law remain effective until that time. As mentioned above, this decision requests the National Assembly to revise it by a certain period. So legal amendment is very important in order that this decision keeps its effectiveness. But the type of decision of constitutional nonconformity is various - by application of the provision and establishment of the legal deadline. A decision of nonconformity devides into prohibiting a provision of constitutional nonconformity and applicating the provision. So a analysis of legal amendment by a decision of constitutional nonconformity depends on the type of decision of constitutional nonconformity. In order to survey whether legal amendment reflect a decision of Constitutional Court, this analysis considers whether the legal amendment follows the established legal deadline, reflects the decision of Constitutional Court and prescribes a retroactive provision.
참고문헌 (22)
- 이준일, "「헌법학강의」, 제3판" (2009), 홍문사
- 정종섭, "「헌법학원론」, 제4판" (2009), 박영사
- 정종섭, "「헌법소송법」, 제5판" (2008), 박영사
- 헌법재판소, "헌법재판실무제요」(제1개정증보판)", ~ (2008)
- 클라우스 슐라이히, "독일연방헌법재판소의 지위․ 절차․ 재판" (2001), 미리
- 김주환, "헌법불합치결정의 적용영역과 그 효과", 헌법학연구, 11(2), pp.503~532 (2005), 한국헌법학회
- 김시철, "형벌조항에 대한 헌법불합치결정", 사법, 1(8), pp.179~216 (2009), 사법발전재단
- 남복현, "헌법불합치결정의 사례별 결정주문과 핵심쟁점의 부조화분석", 헌법논총, 20, pp.243~286 (2009), 헌법재판소
- 남복현, "판례평석: 위헌결정과 헌법불합치결정의 법적 효과에 있어 편차 - 대상판례: 대법 2009. 1. 15. 선고 2004도7111판결-", 한양법학, (26), pp.329~355 (2009), 한양법학회
- 남복현, "判例評釋: 限定的 憲法不合致決定의 必要性 檢討* 헌재 2008. 9. 25. 2007헌가9결정을 중심으로", 공법학연구, 10(1), pp.53~81 (2009), 한국비교공법학회
- 남복현, "헌법재판소 결정의 효력에 관한 쟁점 및 해결방안", 헌법재판연구, 7, pp.151~399 (1996), 헌법재판소
- 남복현, "법률에 관한 변형결정의 유형과 효력", 헌법논총, 9, pp.813~1064 (1998), 헌법재판소
- 문일호, "종합부동산세법 제7조 제1항 등에 대한 헌법불합치결정을 계기로 재조명되는 헌법불합치결정의 의미 및 관련 조세사건의 처리 문제", 법학논총, 26(1), pp.299~323 (2009), 법학연구소
- 박진우, "헌법불합치결정에 대한 비판적 검토", 법학연구, (35), pp.1~25 (2009), 한국법학회
- 방승주, "헌법불합치결정의 문제점과 그 개선방안", 헌법학연구, 13(3), pp.37~94 (2007), 한국헌법학회
- 신봉기, "헌법불합치결정의 이유에 기초한 개선입법의무", 헌법논총, 7, pp.349~384 (1996), 헌법재판소
- 신평, "헌법재판소의 변형결정에 대한 비판적 검토", 헌법학연구, 14(1), pp.257~293 (2008), 한국헌법학회
- 윤진수, "상속의 단순승인 의제규정에 대한 헌법불합치결정의 문제점", 헌법논총, 11, pp.175~232 (2000), 헌법재판소
- 한수웅, "헌법불합치결정의 헌법적 근거와 효력 - 독일에서의 판례와 이론을 중심으로", 헌법논총, 6, pp.481~536 (1995), 헌법재판소
- 한수웅, "헌법불합치결정의 소급효력", 판례월보, 325, pp.8~19 (1997)
- 황도수, "헌법불합치결정에 관한 새로운 체계의 시도", 법조, 51(8), pp.74~110 (2002), 법조협회
- 황우려, "위헌결정의 형식", 헌법재판연구, 1 (1990)