「온실가스 배출권의 할당 및 거래에 관한 법률」제정 논의에 있어서의 문제점 검토
Review of the Existing Bill on 「How to Issue and Trade Emission Allowances of Greenhouse Gas」
2
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Review of the Existing Bill on 「How to Issue and Trade Emission Allowances of Greenhouse Gas」Korea has already enacted “ Green Growth Act” and then set the goal of reducing 30 percent of Greenhouse Gas BAU by 2020. Under the Act, emissions trading program of Greenhouse gas is planned to be adopted from 2015. When emissions trading system is decided to adopt in Korea, the most important issue is “how to allocate initial emissions allowances.” Is “free allocation” during fixed dates inevitable? if a mechanism to protect international competitiveness of Korea’s industry was pursued at the same time, there could be no use of free allocations. In this aspect, the government’s decision to allocate 95 percent of whole allowances free for 6 years from 2015 should be reconsidered. Even though free allocations are argued to be required temporally, the existing bill is highly on the equity issues of emissions allocations. After all, the emissions trading program under the existing bill could not be expected to be successful. Nevertheless, the government of Korea was satisfied to show its intention to introduce the emissions trading program regardless of whether the decision to adopt the program was made from the executive intentions or the results of working –level consideration.
Abstract
Review of the Existing Bill on 「How to Issue and Trade Emission Allowances of Greenhouse Gas」Korea has already enacted “ Green Growth Act” and then set the goal of reducing 30 percent of Greenhouse Gas BAU by 2020. Under the Act, emissions trading program of Greenhouse gas is planned to be adopted from 2015. When emissions trading system is decided to adopt in Korea, the most important issue is “how to allocate initial emissions allowances.” Is “free allocation” during fixed dates inevitable? if a mechanism to protect international competitiveness of Korea’s industry was pursued at the same time, there could be no use of free allocations. In this aspect, the government’s decision to allocate 95 percent of whole allowances free for 6 years from 2015 should be reconsidered. Even though free allocations are argued to be required temporally, the existing bill is highly on the equity issues of emissions allocations. After all, the emissions trading program under the existing bill could not be expected to be successful. Nevertheless, the government of Korea was satisfied to show its intention to introduce the emissions trading program regardless of whether the decision to adopt the program was made from the executive intentions or the results of working –level consideration.
참고문헌 (15)
- 고동원, "탄소배출권 거래법제", 저탄소녹색성장 탄소배출권 인프라구축 로드맵세미나 (2008)
- 김민철, "배출권거래제 도입에 있어 법적 측면과 법경제적 측면에서의 분석 - 배출권할당을 중심으로 -", 환경법연구, 32(2), pp.285~315 (2010), 한국환경법학회
- 김용건, "온실가스 배출권 거래제 도입방향", 환경법연구, 30(2), pp.369~381 (2008), 한국환경법학회
- 효율적배출권거래시장의 형성방안연구: 동태적 효율성을 중심으로, "박호정", 에너지경제연구원, ~, pp.기본연구보고서 04-12 (2004)
- 이비안, "대기오염물질총량규제 및 배출권거래제도에 대한 검토 - 수도권대기환경개선에관한특별법과 관련하여 -", 공법학연구, 8(1), pp.255~280 (2007), 한국비교공법학회
- 이비안, "배출권거래제도에서 자발적 협약의 필요성-일본의 단체협약(공해방지협정)과 관련하여-", 법학연구, 47(2), pp.219~250 (2007), 법학연구소
- 이비안, "수도권대기환경보전법 관련 예치제도에 대한 검토", 법학연구, 48(1), pp.21~52 (2007), 법학연구소
- 이비안, "「수도권대기환경개선에 관한 특별법」 시행 관련 문제점에 대한 검토", 중앙법학, 11(4), pp.367~400 (2009), 중앙법학회
- 이정전, "환경경제학" (2000), 박영사
- 李鍾永, "독일 온실가스배출권거래법의 제정배경과 체계", 중앙법학, 10(1), pp.395~428 (2008), 중앙법학회
- 최봉경, "독일의 탄소배출권거래제도에 관한 소고 - 민사법적 관점을 중심으로 -", 환경법연구, 32(1), pp.433~474 (2010), 한국환경법학회
- 한귀현, "환경법상 배출권거래제도에 관한 연구", 공법학연구, 9(2), pp.353~382 (2008), 한국비교공법학회
- 현준원, "온실가스 배출권거래제도 관련 소송사례와 시사점 - 독일의 사례를 중심으로 -", 환경법연구, 32(3), pp.355~383 (2010), 한국환경법학회
- 프란츠 요셉 파이네, "독일의 배출권거래법의 최근 동향", 환경법연구, 30(2), pp.119~138 (2008), 한국환경법학회
- 데트레프 치블카, "유럽과 독일의 기후변화대책법 - 배출권거래제도 이외의 법제도를 중심으로 - (번역)", 환경법연구, 30(2), pp.183~217 (2008), 한국환경법학회
