교인들의 교회탈퇴 여부 판단시 고려사항에 관한 소고
A Study on Criteria to Determine Whether a Group of Members seceded from Their Church
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In church disputes, Korean Supreme Court (the “Court”), since year 2006, has taken standpoint that the church cannot be divided into two or more groups, but the members can secede from their own church. Because the church is an unincorporated association, anyone who seceded from the church will automatically lose his/her membership, including the rights to enter into the chapel, particularly a church property. For this reason, the Court will merely find that a members seceded from his/her church. Nevertheless, it will not deny the church-secession. Hence, we need to discuss what shall be considered to determine whether a group of members have seceded from their church. The most important sign in the determination of the church-secession is the denial of the common-nature as one church-community. If so, what criteria shall be used to determine whether there is such denial? The Court has suggested such criteria as follows: (i) whether the members shown their intents to secede from the church; (ii) whether the members affirmatively voted to withdraw from the local church’s affiliation with its general church at the general meeting of members; (iii) whether the members have followed the doctrines and the service practices different from the existed those; (iv) the number of the members in the seceding-group; (v) whether the religious community was formed as separated from the existed church; and (vi) they have different name from the existed church, etc. Of the above, the most strong criteria is whether the members have followed the doctrines and the service practice different from the existed those. That is an area in which civil court can not intervene. Hence, the most practicable methods to resolve the church disputes are to divide the disputes into two groups: (i) the doctrinal disputes and (ii) the earthly disputes, and then (a) if it is the doctrinal disputes, the members shall be automatically treated to secede from the church and (b) if the earthly disputes, other resolution methods can apply. In the resolution of the disputes, It must be considered that if a court gives more care of the property rights of each members (and merely find that a members seceded from his/her church), they might be more struggle within the church property.
Abstract
In church disputes, Korean Supreme Court (the “Court”), since year 2006, has taken standpoint that the church cannot be divided into two or more groups, but the members can secede from their own church. Because the church is an unincorporated association, anyone who seceded from the church will automatically lose his/her membership, including the rights to enter into the chapel, particularly a church property. For this reason, the Court will merely find that a members seceded from his/her church. Nevertheless, it will not deny the church-secession. Hence, we need to discuss what shall be considered to determine whether a group of members have seceded from their church. The most important sign in the determination of the church-secession is the denial of the common-nature as one church-community. If so, what criteria shall be used to determine whether there is such denial? The Court has suggested such criteria as follows: (i) whether the members shown their intents to secede from the church; (ii) whether the members affirmatively voted to withdraw from the local church’s affiliation with its general church at the general meeting of members; (iii) whether the members have followed the doctrines and the service practices different from the existed those; (iv) the number of the members in the seceding-group; (v) whether the religious community was formed as separated from the existed church; and (vi) they have different name from the existed church, etc. Of the above, the most strong criteria is whether the members have followed the doctrines and the service practice different from the existed those. That is an area in which civil court can not intervene. Hence, the most practicable methods to resolve the church disputes are to divide the disputes into two groups: (i) the doctrinal disputes and (ii) the earthly disputes, and then (a) if it is the doctrinal disputes, the members shall be automatically treated to secede from the church and (b) if the earthly disputes, other resolution methods can apply. In the resolution of the disputes, It must be considered that if a court gives more care of the property rights of each members (and merely find that a members seceded from his/her church), they might be more struggle within the church property.
참고문헌 (19)
- 김교창, "準社團法人인 敎會의 分割", 저스티스, (98), pp.248~271 (2007), 한국법학원
- 김민기, "교단변경 결의에 찬성한 교인들이 종전 교회에서 탈퇴한 것인지 여부의 판단 기준", 대법원판례해설, (83) (2010), 법원도서관
- 김상용, "敎會財産의 管理에 대한 現行 法律과 判例의 檢討", 법조, 59(6)통권 : 645, pp.31~77 (2010), 법조협회
- 김상중, "민사판례연구, 33-2권" (2011), 박영사
- 김용직, "민법총칙(2)" (2010), 사법행정학회
- 金鎭鉉, "敎會分裂時의 財産歸屬問題에 관한 硏究", 박사, 법학, pp.1988
- 박병칠, "광주지법 재판실무연구" (1997)
- 백현기, "교회의 분쟁에 관한 민사법적 연구", 박사, 민법, pp.2010
- 변동걸, "교회의 분열과 교회재산의 귀속", 민사재판의 제문제, 7, pp.523~ (1993), 한국사법행정학회
- 소재열, "교회정관에 관한 민사법적 연구 : 교회분쟁 해결을 중심으로", 박사, 법학과, pp.2013
- 송호영, "교회의 교인들이 종전교단으로부터 집단적으로 탈퇴하여 별도의 교회를 설립한 경우의 법률관계", 민사법학, (35), pp.191~231 (2007), 한국민사법학회
- 오시영, "교회의 분열과 재산 귀속 관계에 대한 고찰", 인권과 정의, (361), pp.181~204 (2006), 대한변호사협회
- 이완근, "민사법의 실천적 과제 (환도정환담교수 화갑기념)" (2000)
- 이정용, "교단탈퇴 결의에 찬성한 교인들의 지위", 교회와 법, (창간) (2014), 한국교회법학회
- 이학수, "교회의 분열 및 그에 따른 교회재산의 귀속에 관하여 현재의 대법원판례가 취하는 태도에 대한 검토", 판례연구, 1 (1991), 부산판례연구회
- 최창렬, "宗敎團體의 紛爭과 財産歸屬에 관한 硏究", 재산법연구, 25(3), pp.83~134 (2009), 한국재산법학회
- Paul Coltoff, J.D., "American Jurisprudence" (2013), Religious Societies
- Note, "Judicial Intervention in Disputes over the Use of Church Property", Harvard Law Review, 75 (1962)
- Meghaan Cecilia McElroy, "POSSESSION IS NINE TENTHS OF THE LAW:BUT WHO REALLY OWNS A CHURCH'S PROPERTY IN THE WAKE OF A RELIGIOUS SPLIT WITHIN A HIERARCHICAL CHURCH??", William and Mary Law Review (2008)
