Religion Related Lawsuits of Korea - Focusing on the Legal Status of Religious Organizations and their Divisions
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The Presbyterian Church went through several denominational divisions from 1950 to 1960. The denominational division has caused problems concerning local church property. Therefore, the theory of collective ownership was to support the legal division of the congregation. However, church divisions have been related to dense patterns of wealth and status of the pastor rather than doctrinal issues recently. This criterion referred to as 'a collective ownership'( Chong-yoo ) of the members during the division made the resolution of church property dispute almost impossible, mainly because of the reasons that the rapidly growing numbers of church and their wealth. In 2004, the Supreme Court changed the position so that the church property belongs to the two-thirds of the church members with the decision of more than two-thirds of the church membership during the withdrawal from the denomination("2006 Decision"). The 2006 Decision has been a tool for resolution of church disputes and a comprehensive prescription for the local church by establishing a judicial doctrine on many issues which were discussed, including the case law and the legal nature of the church. However, the 2006 Decision's criterion of two-thirds with the majority vote proved to be an unrealistic criterion, mainly because of the reason that the most Korean churches do not keep any book of precise membership. Therefore, there are no means to prove the total number of church members required to win the case. In particular, the case of the Kwangsung Presbyterian Church is a good example. The Supreme Court dismissed the majority's allegation of two-thirds with the majority vote in the general meeting of the church members, based on the failure of submitting the evidence of the precise total number of church members. In addition to it, the Supreme Court gave the Kwangsung Church membership to people who left the denomination, because withdrawal from the Kwangsung Church was distinguished from the denomination withdrawal. This ruling induced a prolonged dispute of Kwangsung Church for more than ten years. The church property should be divided in proportion to the number of the congregation to continue the life of faith with the same doctrinal beliefs when the church splits. Although this suggestion based on the theory of co-ownership has a theoretical problem, in my opinion, it is the most realistic way to resolve church property disputes respecting the church as a belief community. As sharing of the church property consists of a difficult and complicated procedure, many churches with disputes are trying to solve the problem of the church property by calculating a monetary amount in proportion over the actual number of the members instead of leaving the church.
Abstract
The Presbyterian Church went through several denominational divisions from 1950 to 1960. The denominational division has caused problems concerning local church property. Therefore, the theory of collective ownership was to support the legal division of the congregation. However, church divisions have been related to dense patterns of wealth and status of the pastor rather than doctrinal issues recently. This criterion referred to as 'a collective ownership'( Chong-yoo ) of the members during the division made the resolution of church property dispute almost impossible, mainly because of the reasons that the rapidly growing numbers of church and their wealth. In 2004, the Supreme Court changed the position so that the church property belongs to the two-thirds of the church members with the decision of more than two-thirds of the church membership during the withdrawal from the denomination("2006 Decision"). The 2006 Decision has been a tool for resolution of church disputes and a comprehensive prescription for the local church by establishing a judicial doctrine on many issues which were discussed, including the case law and the legal nature of the church. However, the 2006 Decision's criterion of two-thirds with the majority vote proved to be an unrealistic criterion, mainly because of the reason that the most Korean churches do not keep any book of precise membership. Therefore, there are no means to prove the total number of church members required to win the case. In particular, the case of the Kwangsung Presbyterian Church is a good example. The Supreme Court dismissed the majority's allegation of two-thirds with the majority vote in the general meeting of the church members, based on the failure of submitting the evidence of the precise total number of church members. In addition to it, the Supreme Court gave the Kwangsung Church membership to people who left the denomination, because withdrawal from the Kwangsung Church was distinguished from the denomination withdrawal. This ruling induced a prolonged dispute of Kwangsung Church for more than ten years. The church property should be divided in proportion to the number of the congregation to continue the life of faith with the same doctrinal beliefs when the church splits. Although this suggestion based on the theory of co-ownership has a theoretical problem, in my opinion, it is the most realistic way to resolve church property disputes respecting the church as a belief community. As sharing of the church property consists of a difficult and complicated procedure, many churches with disputes are trying to solve the problem of the church property by calculating a monetary amount in proportion over the actual number of the members instead of leaving the church.
참고문헌 (15)
- 김교창, "準社團法人인 敎會의 分割", 저스티스, (98), pp.248~271 (2007), 한국법학원
- 김민규, "교회의 분열과 재산귀속에 관한 판례법리의 변천", 재산법연구, 23(3), pp.191~228 (2007), 한국재산법학회
- 김민기, "교단변경 결의에 찬성한 교인들이 종전 교회에서 탈퇴한 것인지 여부의 판단 기준", 상반기)(, 대법원판례해설 83호(2010, pp.2010. 5. 27)~
- 김상용, "敎會財産의 管理에 대한 現行 法律과 判例의 檢討", 법조, 59(6), pp.31~77 (2010), 법조협회[DOI]
- 김진현, "교회분열시의 재산귀속문제에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.1988
- 김증한, "교회가 분열한 경우의 교회재산의 귀속", 법학, 1(1) (1959), 서울대학교
- 민유숙, "교인들이 집단적으로 교회를 탈퇴한 경우 법률관계 2006. 4. 20. 선고2004다 37775 전원합의체 판결", 대법원판례해설, (60) (2006)
- 박해성, "종교단체에 대한 법적 규율", 민사판례연구, (19) (1997)
- 백현기, "교회의 분쟁에 관한 민사법적 연구", 박사, 민법, pp.2010
- 서헌제, "종교분쟁사례연구②-종교와 재산" (2013), 한국학술정보
- 송호영, "교회의 교인들이 종전교단으로부터 집단적으로 탈퇴하여 별도의 교회를 설립한 경우의 법률관계", 민사법학, (35), pp.191~231 (2007), 한국민사법학회
- 최인석, "교회분열의 인정여부 및 재산귀속- 대상판결 대법원 2006.4.20. 선고 2004다 37775 전원합의체판결", 판례연구, 19 (2008), 부산판례연구회
- 안준엽, "교회의 분열과 재산의 귀속에 관한 연구", 석사, Civil Law, pp.2010
- 양형우, "교회분열에 따른 재산귀속", 재산법연구, 24(1), pp.59~93 (2007), 한국재산법학회
- 황규학, "교회분열시 재산귀속에 대한 한·미 비교연구", 박사, 법학과, pp.2014
