본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

미국 해외부패방지법의 집행동향과 국내기업의 대응방안

The countermeasures by Korean corporations on the Enforcement Trend of the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

This article describes the main reasons why foreign corrupt practices are considered one of the most serious risks to globally-operating corporations, and the countermeasures of Korean corporations against that. First, many countries, especially the 38 countries which ratified the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention, have begun to share information to combat this problem. Particularly noteworthy is that the US Department of Justice (DOJ) started to apply its Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) extraterritorially far more actively than ever. Second, countries such as the USA and EU countries began to impose severe sanctions against offenders who broke laws that prohibit corporations from providing illicit money to foreign politicians and officials. Over the past several years, the amount of penalties levied upon corporate offenders has risen exponentially. The maximum amount one corporation has paid already reached 1.6 billion US dollars. Third, the DOJ(as well as the SEC) has acquired very effective measures and tools (e. g., discretionary power to determine final penalties, plea agreements, deferred prosecution agreements, and the establishment of the FCPA Reporting Center), which make it much easier to collect and accumulate criminal information and to bring charges against FCPA offenders. In addition, U.S. Department of Justice and the Securities Exchange Commission is considering, to process the FCPA violation, that the Corporation have in advance effective compliance program to prevent and disclose FCPA violations, and that program is operating in the real effect. in other words, the Corporation be able to sentenced the non-prosecution disposition by a law enforcement agency, if has been carried out Effective program for preventing corruption, such as established, faithfully enforced the compliance program adequate to the Corporation's business and the environment. Thus, the domestic companies correctly diagnosed business risk, thereby that needs to in advance establish and in good faith enforce the effective compliance programs. and that program must, according to the market's changing conditions and the regulatory environment, continue to evolve. To put this in perspective, this article proposed Practical measures that the Corporation reviewable in planning to hospitality taking into account the experience of leading international companies.

Abstract

This article describes the main reasons why foreign corrupt practices are considered one of the most serious risks to globally-operating corporations, and the countermeasures of Korean corporations against that. First, many countries, especially the 38 countries which ratified the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention, have begun to share information to combat this problem. Particularly noteworthy is that the US Department of Justice (DOJ) started to apply its Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) extraterritorially far more actively than ever. Second, countries such as the USA and EU countries began to impose severe sanctions against offenders who broke laws that prohibit corporations from providing illicit money to foreign politicians and officials. Over the past several years, the amount of penalties levied upon corporate offenders has risen exponentially. The maximum amount one corporation has paid already reached 1.6 billion US dollars. Third, the DOJ(as well as the SEC) has acquired very effective measures and tools (e. g., discretionary power to determine final penalties, plea agreements, deferred prosecution agreements, and the establishment of the FCPA Reporting Center), which make it much easier to collect and accumulate criminal information and to bring charges against FCPA offenders. In addition, U.S. Department of Justice and the Securities Exchange Commission is considering, to process the FCPA violation, that the Corporation have in advance effective compliance program to prevent and disclose FCPA violations, and that program is operating in the real effect. in other words, the Corporation be able to sentenced the non-prosecution disposition by a law enforcement agency, if has been carried out Effective program for preventing corruption, such as established, faithfully enforced the compliance program adequate to the Corporation's business and the environment. Thus, the domestic companies correctly diagnosed business risk, thereby that needs to in advance establish and in good faith enforce the effective compliance programs. and that program must, according to the market's changing conditions and the regulatory environment, continue to evolve. To put this in perspective, this article proposed Practical measures that the Corporation reviewable in planning to hospitality taking into account the experience of leading international companies.

참고문헌 (19)

  1. 임정호, "미국 해외부패방지법의 동향과 그 시사점 -반부패행위를 중심으로-", 법학연구, 22(2), pp.47~70 (2012), 법학연구원[DOI]
  2. 부패와 뇌물공여에 대한 국제적 규제동향에 대한 연구, "문준조", 한국법제연구원, ~ (2001)
  3. 박선욱, "미국 해외부패방지법(Foreign Corrupt Practices Act; FCPA)에 따른 관할권의 역외적용", 법과정책연구, 13(3), pp.1247~1271 (2013), 한국법정책학회
  4. 박은영, "국제상거래에 있어서 외국공무원에 대한 뇌물방지법과 부패라운드", 인권과 정의, (272) (1999), 대한변호사협회
  5. 윤충원, "미국 FCPA 반뇌물규정과 미국기업의 실무적 대응", 무역학회지, 36(2), pp.83~115 (2011), 한국무역학회
  6. 조병선, "‘신종’의 뇌물범죄에 대한 한국의 형법적 대처방안에 대한 고찰", 형사법연구, 21(4), pp.91~110 (2009), 한국형사법학회
  7. 조영찬, "국외훈련검사연구논문집(Ⅲ) 제28집" (2013), 법무연수원
  8. 최대호, "법인처벌의 판단기준으로서 법준수프로그램에 관한 연구", 박사, 형사법, pp.2010
  9. 杉本武重, "FIFAサッカーワールドカップ等の主要なホスピタリテイ行使への招待と腐敗リスク管理", NBL, (1022) (2014)
  10. Kevin E. Davis, "Why Does the United States Regulate Foreign Bribery:Moralism, Self-Interest, or Altruism", N.Y.U. Ann. Surv. Am. L, 67, pp.497~498 (2012)
  11. "A resource Guide to the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practice Act by the Criminal Division of the U.S. Department of Justice and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission", ~
  12. "Bribery Act 2010 guidance" (2012)[URL]
  13. "2013 U.S. Dist. 24-25 Fed. Sec. L. Rep(CCH), P. 97, 295(S.D.N.Y. Feb. 8, 2013)", ~ (2013)
  14. "2013 U.S. Dist. Fed Sec. L. Rep(CCH), P. 97, 292(S.D.N.Y. Feb. 19, 2013)", ~ (2013)
  15. "SEC v. UTStarcom, Inc., No.CV 09-6094(N.D.Cal.)"[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)