본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

현행 민법상 후견제도의 문제점과 성년후견제도의 도입에 관한 고찰

A Study of the Issues of Guardianship System and the Introduction of Adult Guardianship System in Current Civil Law

1

조회

0

다운로드

15

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

Abstract

Recently, legal problems related to the elderly people have been the critical issues in ageing society of the world. Adult guardianship system is included in the area that the legal researchers should consider. In fact, according to the process of ageing society, people who cannot treat their property or personal problems have increased because of their physical or psychological disabilities. So, the social security system to protect or support for the disabled should be a critical issue. Almost all people are inclined to suffer from physical and psychological regression on the progress of aging. One of the symptoms is a general trend that they cannot stand on their feet without others' support. On the other hand, they will suffer from memory problem because of their physical regression or judgement disorder though it is not caused by serious diseases such as senile dementia or stroke. The elderly who suffer from those kinds of diseases may well be an target of various wicked crimes. A rapid progress of a nuclear family structure make the elderly isolated from the family member and excluded from economical benefits. This study focuses on the guidance of the elderly based on the social system. In current civil law system, however, a system of an incompetent person is classified as three categories relied on the rigid and monolithic standard: a minor, a quasi-incompetence, and an incompetence. The three systems, such as a quasi-incompetence, an incompetence, and guardianship system, are the major structures for the elderly and the mentally disabled. However, the current legal system has not protected the property and personality for the people of lacking communicative ability and the elderly people of physical impediment, so the guardianship should be supplemented. The legal structure for the guardianship system should be immediately established in order to support the elderly, which is separated from the system for an incompetent person. The system should value the right of the person's own determination and be revised for practical supporting those who need the guardianship. In advanced countries, they already established a legal adult guardianship system as a way of protecting a self-determination right of the elderly and the disabled. The system also prevents them from illegal disadvantages, mistakes, or immature activities. This study, first, reviewed the problems of current legal system in quasi-incompetence, incompetence, and guardianship system. Second, it pointed out an adult guardianship system in foreign countries and discussed the introduction and the solution of the system in Korean society. Third, this paper concluded that the legal system of an adult guardianship should be enacted for an ageing society in Korea.

참고문헌 (42)

  1. 곽윤직, "민법총칙" (2002), 박영사
  2. 김용한, "신친족상속법론" (2002), 박영사
  3. 김주수, "친족상속법" (2006), 법문사
  4. 명순구, "프랑스 민법전" (2004), 법문사
  5. 박동섭, "친족상속법" (2007), 박영사
  6. 박병호, "가족법" (1993), 한국방송통신대학출판부
  7. 법무부, "민법(재산편)개정자료집", ~ (2004)
  8. 송덕수, "신민법강의" (2009), 박영사
  9. 양창수, "독일민법전" (2008), 박영사
  10. 한봉회, "가족법" (2005), 푸른세상
  11. 김민중, "임의후견제도의 개혁", 법학연구, 27 (2008), 전북대 법학연구소.
  12. 김성숙, "한정치산 · 금치산제도의 문제점", 법학논총, 11 (1998), 숭실대 법학연구소
  13. 김성숙, "성년후견법의 비교법적 고찰", 가족법연구, 12 (1998), 한국가족법학회
  14. 김원숙, "성년후견제도의 법제화에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.2005
  15. 김용한, "후견", 사법행정 (1974), 한국사법행정학회
  16. 박윤경, "성년후견제도의 입법화를 위한 고찰", 석사, pp.2007
  17. 백승흠, "成年後見의 監督에관한 고찰― 독일과 일본의 제도를 비교하여 ―", 가족법연구, 20(2), pp.65~90 (2006), 한국가족법학회
  18. 백승흠, "우리나라에서의 성년후견제도의 도입과 그 검토, in:고령사회와 성년후견제도", 고령화사회법제 워크샵 (2003), 한국법제연구원
  19. 백승흠, "성년후견제도의 입법방향", 민사법학, (18) (2005), 한국민사법학회
  20. 신영호, "고령사회의 도래와 친족법상의 과제", 안암법학, (20) (2005), 고려대법학연구소
  21. 오경희, "성년후견제도에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.1999
  22. 우주형, "장애성년후견제도 도입에 관한 소고", 중앙법학, 10(4), pp.201~244 (2008), 중앙법학회
  23. 윤진수, "친족회의 동의를 얻지 않은 후견인의 법률행위에 대한 표현대리의 성립 여부", 민사법학, (19) (2001), 한국민사법학회
  24. 이덕환, "미국에 있어서 성년후견제도의 개혁", 한양법학, 11 (2000), 양법학회
  25. 이병화, "成年後見制度의 導入에 따른 國際後見法의 再考察", 비교사법, 13(3), pp.85~137 (2006), 한국비교사법학회
  26. 이영규, "성년후견제도에 관한 연구", 사회복지, (178) (2008), 한국사회복지협의회
  27. 이은영, "성년후견제도에 관한 입법제안", 한일법학연구, 20 (2001), 한일법학회
  28. 이은영, "성년후견제도의 개선 방향", 외법논집, 15 (2003), 한국외국어 대법학연구소
  29. 이재숙, "미성년자후견제도의 실태와 개선방안", 석사, pp.2000
  30. 장현옥, "우리나라 후견제도의 문제점과 개선 방안", 아세아여성법학, (3) (2000), 아세아여성법학연구소
  31. 정남기, "성년후견제도에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.2001
  32. 제철웅, "성년후견제도의 개정방향", 민사법학, (42), pp.111~149 (2008), 한국민사법학회
  33. 제철웅, "성년후견제도의 도입논의와 영국의 정신능력법의 시사점", 가족법연구, 21(3), pp.275~310 (2007), 한국가족법학회
  34. 홍춘의, "후견제도 개혁의 과제", 가족법연구, 16(2), pp.1~39 (2002), 한국가족법학회
  35. 小林昭諺, "成年後見制度の槪要", 判例タイムズ, (1030) (2000)
  36. 安永正昭, "成年後見 改革の意義", 民商法雜誌, 122(4)
  37. 升田純, "成年後見制度をめぐる裁判制例(Ⅰ)", 判例時報, (1572) (1997)
  38. J. Dalrymple, "Anti - Oppressive Practice, 2nd. ed. Norman Whitehorn", court of protection Handbook, ~ (1988)
  39. P.Bartlett, "The Mental Capacity Act" (2005), Oxford University pres
  40. Jeam- Jaques Lemouland, "Majeurs protégés" (2008), Recueil Dailloz
  41. Laurence pécaut - Rivolier, "Protection judiciaire des majeurs:entrée en vigueur de la réforme" (2008), Recueil Dalloz
  42. Larenz-Wolf, "Allgemeiner Teil des Burgerliches Rechts", ~ (1997)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (18건)