우리나라에서 성년후견제도의 도입
Introduction to the Adult Guardianship Law system in Korea
2
조회
0
다운로드
13
인용
0
참고문헌
초록
Abstract
Our society is becoming an aged society. There are increasing human beings who have incomplete mental ability in our society. Under the current civil law, incompetence and quasi-incompetence system are used in case of deterioration of mental judgement. But the system is rigid because it only provides two types by law despite of being various degrees of mental judgement. Once incompetence or quasi-incompetence is pronounced by a court, it is recorded in the registration of family relationship. In addition, there are social prejudice against the words such as incompetence and quasi-incompetence. Hence, there are hardly anyone who use this system, and the system is practically not being used and is ending up as a mere scrap paper. Therefore, in order to actively deal with these problems, we are trying to reform this system or to enforce the new adult guardianship laws. So, this study is designed to meet the needs of reforming the area of a guardianship for mentally incapacitated adults. When we reflect a new reform legislation, we should focus on respecting the human right and dignity of mentally incapacitated adults. And the new reform should guarantee their autonomy and minimize the public invention for assisting them. At the same time, their needs should be fully satisfied. In addition, it is desirable to introduce and enforce the new guardianship regime after fulfilling all the conditions necessary for the operation of the regime, such as proper organization, enough funds and relevant procedure. In particular, the guardianship in the aging society should focus on the protection of the aged more thorouly. To do this, it is indispensible to cultivate guardians for the adults more systematically.
참고문헌 (16)
- 곽윤직, "민법총칙", pp.141~ (1999), 박영사
- 양창수, "성년부조제도-한정치산.금치산", 고시연구, 12, pp.63~ (1994)
- 김이영, "정신보건의 문제점들", 정신건강연구, 10, pp.157~ (1991), 한양대 정신건강연구소
- 백승흠, "현행 성년자보호를 위한 제도의 문제점과 대안으로서의 성년후견제도", 민사법학, (24), pp.412~ (2003), 한국민사법학회
- 우주형, "장애성년후견제도 도입에 관한 소고", 중앙법학, 10(4), pp.201~244 (2008), 중앙법학회
- 권순한, "법정후견인제도", 아세아여성법학, (3), pp.91~93 (2000), 아세아 여성법학연구소
- 장현옥, "우리나라 후견제도의 문제점과 개선방향", 아세아여성법학, (3), pp.157~ (2000), 아세아여성법학연구소
- 이병화, "成年後見制度의 導入에 따른 國際後見法의 再考察", 비교사법, 13(3), pp.85~137 (2006), 한국비교사법학회
- 법원행정처, "법원실무제요-가사", 법원행정처, 581~ (1994)
- 제철웅, "성년후견제도의 개정방향", 민사법학, (42), pp.111~149 (2008), 한국민사법학회
- 송호열, "성년후견법제에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.2002
- 정조근, "後見人登錄制度에 관한 考察", 가족법연구, 20(3), pp.131~150 (2006), 한국가족법학회
- 남윤봉, "高齡化 社會에서의 成年後見에 관한 硏究", 법과정책연구, 8(2), pp.705~731 (2008), 한국법정책학회
- 성년후견제 사회복지분야 지원방안 연구, "번용찬", 보건복지가족부 정책보고서, 122~, pp.2009-41 (2009)
- 김민중, "성년후견제도의 도입에 관한 논의에서 의료행위와 관련한 과제", 저스티스, 112, pp.208~239 (2009), 한국법학원
- 오호철, "일본의 성년후견제도와 우리나라의 성년후견법안의 비교", 비교사법, 15(2), pp.295~335 (2008), 한국비교사법학회
