계약이행보증금에 관한 연구
A Study on the Contract Deposit
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this thesis, I researched major legal subjects of a contract deposit. To begin with, I studied the regal nature of a contract deposit. In case that a contract has a method of belonging of a contract deposit when the default on obligations has arisen, the regal nature of a contract deposit is a kind of a security for damages. While the contract has not a method of belonging of a contract deposit, the contract deposit is a kind of a cancellation charge,and so it can be admitted as a previously fixed amount of damages or a penalty for a breach of a contract. It is determined by interpretation of a contract whether a cancellation charge is a previously fixed amount of damages or a penalty for a breach of a contract. It is presumed that a cancellation charge is a previously fixed amount of damages by article 398(4) of Korean civil law, so a cancellation charge is a previously fixed amount of damages unless a specific agreement has been made between the parties. Secondly, I studied the requisite for payment of a contract deposit. If a contractor(a person who gives out a contract for the work) wants to claim the contract deposit from the guarantor, the warranty events or insured events should occur before. It become an issue when the warranty events or insured events occur. It is not easy to standardize and to determine whether the termination of a contract is needed or not when the contractor wants to claim the contract deposit from the guarantor. One adjudication of the Supreme Court of Korea ruled that the termination of a contract is needed, and the other adjudication of the Supreme Court of Korea ruled that the termination of a contract is not needed. However we cannot say these two adjudications are contradictory to each other. Thirdly, I studied the coverage of a contract deposit. In case that the legal nature of the contract deposit is a penalty for a breach of a contract, all the contract deposit belongs to the contractor. In case that the legal nature of the contract deposit is a previously fixed amount of damages, in principle the contract deposit covers all damages from which the contractor suffers owing to the default of the other contractor(a person who contracts to do the work).
Abstract
In this thesis, I researched major legal subjects of a contract deposit. To begin with, I studied the regal nature of a contract deposit. In case that a contract has a method of belonging of a contract deposit when the default on obligations has arisen, the regal nature of a contract deposit is a kind of a security for damages. While the contract has not a method of belonging of a contract deposit, the contract deposit is a kind of a cancellation charge,and so it can be admitted as a previously fixed amount of damages or a penalty for a breach of a contract. It is determined by interpretation of a contract whether a cancellation charge is a previously fixed amount of damages or a penalty for a breach of a contract. It is presumed that a cancellation charge is a previously fixed amount of damages by article 398(4) of Korean civil law, so a cancellation charge is a previously fixed amount of damages unless a specific agreement has been made between the parties. Secondly, I studied the requisite for payment of a contract deposit. If a contractor(a person who gives out a contract for the work) wants to claim the contract deposit from the guarantor, the warranty events or insured events should occur before. It become an issue when the warranty events or insured events occur. It is not easy to standardize and to determine whether the termination of a contract is needed or not when the contractor wants to claim the contract deposit from the guarantor. One adjudication of the Supreme Court of Korea ruled that the termination of a contract is needed, and the other adjudication of the Supreme Court of Korea ruled that the termination of a contract is not needed. However we cannot say these two adjudications are contradictory to each other. Thirdly, I studied the coverage of a contract deposit. In case that the legal nature of the contract deposit is a penalty for a breach of a contract, all the contract deposit belongs to the contractor. In case that the legal nature of the contract deposit is a previously fixed amount of damages, in principle the contract deposit covers all damages from which the contractor suffers owing to the default of the other contractor(a person who contracts to do the work).
참고문헌 (17)
- 곽윤직, "채권총론(제6판)" (2003), 박영사
- 김동훈, "계약보증금 몰취약정의 해석", 법률신문, 2820 (1999)
- 김창보, "채무자의 귀책사유로 매매계약이 해제되었을 때 채무자는 계약보증 금을 채권자에게 귀속시키고 손해배상책임도 지기로 약정한 경우, 계 약보증금 귀속의 약정을 위약벌이 아닌 일종의 손해배상의 예정이라고 해석한 사례", 대법원판례해설, 32 (1999)
- 김영태, "공사도급계약에 있어서 공사이행보증금의 성질(손해배상액의 예정과 위약벌의 구별)", 대법원판례해설, 24 (1996)
- 박흥대, "공사도급계약에 있어서 계약보증금의 법적 성질 - 대법원 1999. 8. 20. 선고 98다28886 판결", 판례연구, 11 (2000)
- 송덕수, "신민법강의" (2011), 박영사
- 이충상, "계약보증금에 관한 몇 가지 고찰 - 손해배상액의 예정인지 위약벌인 지 및 감액 가능 여부 등-”", 사법논집, 32 (2001)
- 이경철, "하도급계약이행보증금 귀속조항이 위약벌을 규정한 것인지 아니면 손해배상 예정을 규정한 것인지 여부(1999. 8. 20. 선고 98다 28886 판결 : 미1999하, 1865)", 대법원판례해설, 33(33) (2000)
- 양승규, "이행보증보험 주채무의 이행기일 연기의 효과", 손해보험, 345 (1997)
- 윤 경, "손해배상예정액과 위약벌의 구별 및 구 예산회계법상 차액보증금, 차 액보증계약의 성질", 대법원판례해설, 40 (2002)
- 윤재윤, "건설관련 보증", 인권과 정의, 324, pp.4~ (2003), 대한변호사협회
- 윤재윤, "건설분쟁관계법" (2008), 박영사
- 이범상, "건설관련소송" (2008), 법률문화원
- 전현철, "건설보증의 종류와 법률관계", 법학논총, 22, pp.213~249 (2009), 법학연구소
- 조성민, "保證期間의 經過와 保證金의 返還請求", 법학논총, 23(1), pp.1~24 (2006), 법학연구소
- 최두진, "건설도급계약에서의 보증인의 책임범위", 민사법학, 43(1), pp.399~428 (2008), 한국민사법학회
- B 2, in Umfang einer Vertragserfüllungsbürgschaft in Auftraggeber AGB, "VOB", pp.2011, Ganten
