保證債務 및 保證人地位의 相續
Succession of Suretyship or Surety Obligations
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study aims at probe into the surety obligations of guarantor's successor. Korean Civil Code §1005 suggest that death of one party gives an end to “highly-exclusive contractual relationship”. However it is inappropriate to consider continuous suretyship such as “a highly-exclusive contractual relationship”, considering guarantor bear obligation in the manner of “payments of money”. In conclusion protection of guarantor’s successor should be achieved by means of limited recognition or refusal of succession. In parenthesis guarantor’s successor could be authorized to terminate a surety contract. In Korean jurisprudence nowadays, it is not allowed successor to terminate a contract. but denied surety obligation of guarantor’s successor only in the case of no ceiling and no period of suretyship. This is not based on appropriate ground. Successor should be authorized to terminate a surety on the ground of fundamental ground. Fundamental ground might be recognized consider- ing change of circumstances i. e. good faith.
Abstract
This study aims at probe into the surety obligations of guarantor's successor. Korean Civil Code §1005 suggest that death of one party gives an end to “highly-exclusive contractual relationship”. However it is inappropriate to consider continuous suretyship such as “a highly-exclusive contractual relationship”, considering guarantor bear obligation in the manner of “payments of money”. In conclusion protection of guarantor’s successor should be achieved by means of limited recognition or refusal of succession. In parenthesis guarantor’s successor could be authorized to terminate a surety contract. In Korean jurisprudence nowadays, it is not allowed successor to terminate a contract. but denied surety obligation of guarantor’s successor only in the case of no ceiling and no period of suretyship. This is not based on appropriate ground. Successor should be authorized to terminate a surety on the ground of fundamental ground. Fundamental ground might be recognized consider- ing change of circumstances i. e. good faith.
참고문헌 (29)
- 郭潤直, (2004), 博英社
- 金永信, "繼續的 契約關係의 解止에 관한 硏究", 박사, pp.2008
- 金云淏, "債務相續, 相續法의 諸問題", 裁判資料, (78) (1998), 法院圖書館
- 김세진, "繼續的 保證契約에서의 保證人의 解止權", 영남법학, 4(1) (1998)
- 金疇洙, "친족·상속법(제9판)" (2008), 法文社
- 朴炳大, "繼續的 保證에 관한 考察", 司法論輯, (18) (1987), 법원행정처
- 朴駿緖, "第3版" (2002), 韓國司法行政學會
- 法務部, "民法(財産法)改正資料集", 法務資料, (260) (2004)
- 梁彰洙, "繼續的 保證에서 保證人의 解止權과 責任制限,", 民法硏究, (6) (2001), 博英社
- 양창수, "民法改正案의 保證條項에 대하여 ― 改正趣旨와 解釋論 ―", 서울대학교 법학, 45(3), pp.37~65 (2004), 법학연구소
- 梁彰洙, "『民法硏究』 第6券" (2001), 博英社
- 李敦熙, "繼續的 保證契約과 事情變更에 依한 解止權", 判例硏究, (5) (1992), 서울地方辯護士會
- 李玲愛, "事情變更으로 因한 保證契約의 解除", 대법원판례해설, (6) (1986), 법원행정처
- 李銀榮, , 博英社
- 이재곤, "계속적 보증계약에 있어서 보증인의 해지권", 대법원판례해설, (6) (1986), 법원행정처
- 이준형, "계속적 보증에 관한 판례연구 —당사자 의사해석에 의한 책임제한을 중심으로—", 석사, pp.1993
- 최봉경, "｢보증인보호를 위한 특별법｣에 관한 소고", BFL, (33) (2009)
- 崔星京, "상속포기와 고려기간의 기산점", 法曹, 55(12)통권 : 603, 法曹協會
- 崔秀貞, "繼續的 保證債務의 相續", 家族法硏究, (14) (2000), 韓國家族法學會
- 崔哲煥, "회사이사의 사정변경을 이유로 한 보증계약의 해지", 대법원판례해설, (63) (2007), 법원도서관
- Canaris, "Schuldrechtsmodernisierrung 2002, C. H. Beck", ~ (2002)
- "Oettinghaus, Das rechtliche Schicksal von Dauerschuldverhältnissen beim Tod des Verpflichteten, Universita¨tverlag Dr. N. Brockmeyer", ~ (1990)
- Rumpf, "Das Synallagma im Dauerschuldverhältnis, Hartung-Gorre, Wolfgang", ~ (2002)
- 菅野耕穀, "信義則およぴ權利濫用の硏究" (1994), 信山社
- 西村信雄, "身元保証の硏究" (1956), 有斐閣
- 天野佳洋, "保證契約締結後の事情の變更と包括根保證人の責任の範圍, ジュリスト 1994. 6(擔保法の判例), 有斐閣", ~ (1994)