總有에 관한 民法規定의 改正方案
A Proposal on Revision of the Provisions of “Gesamteigentum” of the Korean Civil Code
0
조회
0
다운로드
18
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper has focused on my personal opinion that aims to investigate problems in the provisions of the “Gesamteigentum(a collective ownership of a corporate non-juridical person)” in the current Korean Civil Code, and to present a proposal on the new provisions of the ownership of a corporate non-juridical person on the basis of this investigation. To achieve the aim of this paper, I have investigated variety of legislations about the provisions of forms of ownership of a corporate non-juridical person and I have analyzed the background and the process of a unique legislation of the current Korean Civil Code about the “Gesamteigentum” that was a form of land-ownership of the Middle Ages German “Genossenschaft(a village association).”In this paper on the basis of this comparative and historical investigation about the “Gesamteigentum” I have examined whether the provisions of the current Korean Civil Code about the “Gesamteigentum” has appropriateness or not. The conclusion of this paper is as follows. (1) It was so careless or unreasonable legislative measures that the Korean Civil Code has codified the “Gesamteigentum” as a general type of joint ownerships that was only a lecturing concept for a form of land-ownership of the Middle Ages German “Genossenschaft(a village association).”(2) The Korean Civil Code provide the legal relations of “Gesamteigentum” as a type of the modern joint ownership but I think It was a serious legislative mistake, because “Gesamteigentum” is not personal ownership but is only the power of use the property of the a village association. (3) The provisions of the “Gesamteigentum” in current Korean Civil Code must be revised, because it is not desirable in a viewpoint of legislative policy. On the basis of this investigation I propose a way of revising plan for amendment of the current Korean Civil Code about the “Gesamteigentum”.
Abstract
This paper has focused on my personal opinion that aims to investigate problems in the provisions of the “Gesamteigentum(a collective ownership of a corporate non-juridical person)” in the current Korean Civil Code, and to present a proposal on the new provisions of the ownership of a corporate non-juridical person on the basis of this investigation. To achieve the aim of this paper, I have investigated variety of legislations about the provisions of forms of ownership of a corporate non-juridical person and I have analyzed the background and the process of a unique legislation of the current Korean Civil Code about the “Gesamteigentum” that was a form of land-ownership of the Middle Ages German “Genossenschaft(a village association).”In this paper on the basis of this comparative and historical investigation about the “Gesamteigentum” I have examined whether the provisions of the current Korean Civil Code about the “Gesamteigentum” has appropriateness or not. The conclusion of this paper is as follows. (1) It was so careless or unreasonable legislative measures that the Korean Civil Code has codified the “Gesamteigentum” as a general type of joint ownerships that was only a lecturing concept for a form of land-ownership of the Middle Ages German “Genossenschaft(a village association).”(2) The Korean Civil Code provide the legal relations of “Gesamteigentum” as a type of the modern joint ownership but I think It was a serious legislative mistake, because “Gesamteigentum” is not personal ownership but is only the power of use the property of the a village association. (3) The provisions of the “Gesamteigentum” in current Korean Civil Code must be revised, because it is not desirable in a viewpoint of legislative policy. On the basis of this investigation I propose a way of revising plan for amendment of the current Korean Civil Code about the “Gesamteigentum”.
참고문헌 (55)
- 郭潤直, "民法總則, 第七版" (2004), 博英社
- 郭潤直, "物權法, 第七版" (1993), 博英社
- 黃迪仁, (1983), 博英社
- 國會事務處, "第26回國會定期會議速記錄", ~ (1957)
- 明淳龜, "실록 대한민국 민법 1" (2008), 法文社
- 明淳龜, "실록 대한민국 민법 2" (2008), 法文社
- 民議院法制司法委員會民法案審議小委員會, "民法案審議錄(上卷)" (1957)
- 民法改正案硏究會, "民法改正案意見書" (2002), 三知院
- 法務部, "民法(財産編)改正資料集" (2004)
- 民事法硏究會, "民法案意見書" (1957), 一潮閣
- "2004년 民法改正案: 民法中改正法律案", ~ (2004)
- 姜台星, "民法改正에 있어서의 收去權·總有·假登記에 관한 立法論", 比較私法, 7(2), pp.425~ (2000), 韓國比較私法學會
- 강태성, "민법 제2편(물권)의 개정", 재산법연구, 21(2), pp.19~61 (2005), 한국재산법학회
- 姜台星, "이른바 總有에 대한 비판적 검토", 民事法硏究, 15(1), pp.73~ (2007), 大韓民事法學會
- 高翔龍, "里名義로 된 財産과 里住民의 總有", 법률신문 제1979호, 11~ (1990)
- 金敎昌, "民法總則중 法人에 관한 改正意見", 法曹, 통권 : 548 (2002), 法曹協會
- 김교창, "準社團法人인 敎會의 分割", 저스티스, (98), pp.248~271 (2007), 한국법학원
- 金鎭鉉, "權利能力없는 社團", 民事法學, (11), pp.509~ (1995), 韓國民事法學會
- 金滉植, "物權法의 改正方向", 民事判例硏究, 7, pp.313~ (1985), 民事判例硏究會
- 남기윤, "오토포이에시스(autopoiesis)시스템과 法人理論", 저스티스, 72, pp.78~106 (2003), 한국법학원
- 남기윤, "독일법에서 合手理論과 民法上 組合의 法人格인정에 관한 최근 논쟁", 저스티스, (79), pp.53~77 (2004), 한국법학원
- 남윤봉, "非法人敎會財産의 歸屬에 관하여 - 大判 2006. 4. 20. 2004다37775를 중심으로", 법학논총, 23(2), pp.359~384 (2006), 법학연구소
- 閔裕淑, "교인들이 집단적으로 교회를 탈퇴한 경우 법률관계", 대법원판례해설, (60), pp.31~ (2006), 법원도서관
- 배병일, "송이採取에 관한 山林契의 慣習", 토지법학, 24(1), pp.77~97 (2008), 한국토지법학회
- 송호영, "교회의 교인들이 종전교단으로부터 집단적으로 탈퇴하여 별도의 교회를 설립한 경우의 법률관계", 민사법학, (35), pp.191~231 (2007), 한국민사법학회
- 沈羲基, "契(공동체)재산의 소유이용관계와 總有: 洞契(촌락공동체)를 중심으로", 嶺南大學校, 11(1), pp.59~ (1991)
- 安榮文, "민법상의 組合과 非法人社團의 구별표준 및 非法人社團의 채무의 귀속", 대법원판례해설, (18), pp.137~ (1993), 법원행정처
- 양형우, "교회분열에 따른 재산귀속", 재산법연구, 24(1), pp.59~93 (2007), 한국재산법학회
- 李起羽, "韓國의 宗中財産및 非法人宗敎財産의 實名化와 法的課題: 總有理論을 中心으로", 土地法學, (11), pp.203~ (1995), 韓國土地法學會
- 李德勝, , pp.158~ (1992), 經世院
- 李德勝, "民法上總有規定의 當否에 關한 小考", 성균 law forum, (2), pp.90~ (1998), 성균관대학교 비교법연구소
- 李好珽, "우리 民法上의 共同所有制度에 대한 약간의 疑問-特히 合有와 總有를 中心으로-", 서울대 法學, 24(2), pp.102~ (1983), 서울대학교 법학연구소
- 張庚鶴, "分裂된 敎會財産의 總有關係", 법률신문 제1007호, 8~ (1973)
- 張庚鶴, "信徒들이 寄附한 敎會財産은 信徒들의 總有에 속한다", 법률신문 제1060호, 8~ (1974)
- 鄭權燮, "共同所有形態에 관한 一類型: 總有의 法理構成을 中心으로", 私法硏究, (3), pp.192~ (1995)
- 정정미, "촌락공동체(자연부락)의 재산에 관한 소송", 實務硏究資料, 7, pp.6~ (2006), 대전지방법원
- 崔栻, "總有에 관한 問題", 法曹, 14(2), pp.36~ (1965), 法曹協會
- 崔寅奭, "교회분열의 인정 여부 및 재산의 귀속", 判例硏究, 19, pp.51~ (2008), 釜山判例硏究會
- 최철환, "保證約定의 總有物 管理·處分 해당 與否", 사법, 1(1), pp.195~221 (2007), 사법발전재단
- 黃迪仁, "分裂된 敎會財産의 總有關係", 서울대 法學判例回顧, (2), pp.40~ (1974), 서울대학교 법학연구소
- 梅謙次郞, "民法要義(卷之一總則編), 訂正增補第33版" (1984), 有斐閣書房
- 梅謙次郞, "民法要義(卷之二物權編), 訂正增補第31版" (1985), 有斐閣書房
- 梅謙次郞, "民法要義(卷之三債權編), 訂正增補第33版" (1985), 有斐閣書房
- 岡松參太郞, "註釋民法理由(上卷), 訂正12版" (1897), 有斐閣
- 富井政章, "民法原論第一卷總論, 大正11年合冊版復刻版" (1985), 有斐閣
- 我妻榮, "新訂物權法(民法講義Ⅱ)" (1983), 巖波書店
- 川島武宜, "民法總則" (1975), 有斐閣
- 廣中俊雄, "民法修正案(前三編)の理由書" (1987), 有斐閣
- 岡松參太郞, "註釋民法理由(上卷)" (1897), 有斐閣書房
- 前田達明, "史料民法典" (2004), 成文堂
- 柚木馨, "柚木馨, 滿洲民法讀本" (1942), 新京滿洲有斐閣
- 村敎三, 滿洲民法(物權), "石田文次郞", pp.1943, 石田文次郞
- 星野英一, "いわゆる權利能力なき社團について" (1970), 有斐閣
- 山田誠一, "團體, 共同所有および共同債權關係, In 民法講座別卷1" (1990), 有斐閣
- 加藤雅信, "總有論, 合有論のミニ法人論的構造, In 星野英一先生古稀祝賀日本民法學の形成と課題上" (1996), 有斐閣