비법인사단 관련 규정에 대한 소고-민법 제32조 허가주의와 제275조 이하 총유규정을 중심으로-
A study on the regulations about Unincorporated Association -Focusing on the regulations about §32 and below §275 of Collective Ownership on the Civil Law system in Korea-
2
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In Korea, lots of unincorporated associations exist. But Korea civil law regulates just three articles about the property relationship for the unincorporated association. So those three articles can't control the complicated and various property relationships between unincorporated association and the other party. Specially, the articles give unincorporated association an advantage in the transactions. And many scholar have suggested to change the regulation about permission to the corporation from unincorporated association. This regulation means §32 on the civil law system in Korea, they thought this article can make lots of unincorporated associations. If it is changed to more relief way, unincorporated association will be decreased and Korea civil law can easily control those associations. What is more, because of this articles' origin and simplicity, many scholars have maintained to abolish those articles of to keep it. In this thesis, after I saw through those two types of opinion, tried to suggest rational solutions (with the problem of protecting the other party in the transactions. About §32, I think change that article to the relief way and that keeping §275-277 and compensating the defect articles are far better in total. Because 'collective ownership', the ownership types of the unincorporated association, was made since 1960 and many unincorporated associations have been controlled by those articles and judgmental decisions. In conclusion, this thesis tried to suggest better ways that legislators have to consider.
Abstract
In Korea, lots of unincorporated associations exist. But Korea civil law regulates just three articles about the property relationship for the unincorporated association. So those three articles can't control the complicated and various property relationships between unincorporated association and the other party. Specially, the articles give unincorporated association an advantage in the transactions. And many scholar have suggested to change the regulation about permission to the corporation from unincorporated association. This regulation means §32 on the civil law system in Korea, they thought this article can make lots of unincorporated associations. If it is changed to more relief way, unincorporated association will be decreased and Korea civil law can easily control those associations. What is more, because of this articles' origin and simplicity, many scholars have maintained to abolish those articles of to keep it. In this thesis, after I saw through those two types of opinion, tried to suggest rational solutions (with the problem of protecting the other party in the transactions. About §32, I think change that article to the relief way and that keeping §275-277 and compensating the defect articles are far better in total. Because 'collective ownership', the ownership types of the unincorporated association, was made since 1960 and many unincorporated associations have been controlled by those articles and judgmental decisions. In conclusion, this thesis tried to suggest better ways that legislators have to consider.
참고문헌 (43)
- 곽윤직, "물권법" (2000), 박영사
- 곽윤직, "민법강의Ⅰ" (2013), 박영사
- 김기선, "한국물권법" (1990), 법원사
- 김상용, "민법총칙" (2009), 화산미디어
- 김용한, "물권법론" (1993), 박영사
- 김증한, "민법총칙" (2006), 박영사
- 民事法硏究會, "民法案意見書" (1957), 一潮閣
- 윤철홍, "물권법" (2009), 법원사
- 이영준, "물권법" (1996), 박영사
- 이영준, "한국민법론" (2005), 박영사
- 지원림, "민법강의" (2009), 홍문사
- 홍일표, "민법주해Ⅰ" (1992), 박영사
- 황적인, "현대민법론(Ⅰ)" (1985), 박영사
- 石田文次郎, "土地總有權史論" (1927), 岩波書店
- 石田文次郎, "ギ-ルケの團體法論" (1929), ロゴス書院
- 石田文次郎, "ギ-ルケの法學" (1944), 三省堂
- 齊藤和夫, "民法 I" (2007), 中央經濟社
- 佐久間毅, "民法の 基礎1" (2008), 有斐閣
- 강태성, "민법(학)에 있어 용어와 개념의 당부", 민사법이론과 실무, 6 (2003)
- 강태성, "이른바 총유에 대한 비판적 검토", 민사법연구, 15(1) (2007)
- 김교창, "非登記社團法人은 非法人社團이 아니다", 저스티스, 140, pp.91~110 (2014), 한국법학원
- 총유관련 규정의 개정에 관한 연구, "김대정", 법무부, ~ (2011)
- 남기윤, "私法상 法人槪念의 새로운 構成 -새로운 法人理論의 提案", 저스티스, 70, pp.166~206 (2002), 한국법학원
- 설립등기 없는 사단·재단의 법적 규율, "남효순", 법무부, ~ (2009)
- 명순구, "공동소유제도의 개정방향 － 합유･총유의 재정비 －", 안암법학, (34), pp.329~364 (2011), 안암법학회
- 박찬주, "法人 아닌 社團 및 財團에 대한 새로운 理解", 법학연구, 48(1), pp.819~866 (2007), 법학연구소
- 송호영, "교회의 교인들이 종전교단으로부터 집단적으로 탈퇴하여 별도의 교회를 설립한 경우의 법률관계", 민사법학, (35), pp.191~231 (2007), 한국민사법학회
- 송호영, "민법상 법인아닌 단체에 대한 입법론 연구", 법학연구, 39, pp.1~38 (2013), 부설법학연구소
- 송호영, "법인의 활동과 귀속의 문제-법인본질논쟁의 극복을 위한 하나의 시론-", 한국민사법학회 동계학술대회 및 정기총회 자료집 (2006), 한국민사법학회
- 양창수, "민법연구 제6권" (2007), 박영사
- 윤철홍, "비영리법인설립에 관한 입법론적 고찰", 민사법학, (47), pp.719~756 (2009), 한국민사법학회
- 이주흥, "권리능력 없는 사단", 사법논집 (1991)
- 이호정, "우리 민법상 공동소유제도에 대한 약간의 의문 –특히 합유와 총유를 중심으로-", 서울대법학, 24(2․3) (1983)
- 임상혁, "법인이 아닌 사단의 당사자능력과 권리능력", 민사법학, (39-1), pp.415~437 (2007), 한국민사법학회
- 임상혁, "법인이 아닌 사단의 민사법상 지위에 관한 고찰 - 총유 규정을 둘러싼 민법 개정 논의와 관련하여 -", 서울대학교 법학, 54(3), pp.189~209 (2013), 법학연구소
- 전경운, "우리 민법상 總有에 관한 一考察", 토지법학, 26(1), pp.145~174 (2010), 한국토지법학회
- 법인 아닌 사단의 재산관계 규율 개선에 관한 연구, "정병호", 법무부, ~ (2012)
- 정종휴, "독일과 일본의 총유이론사", 법사학연구, (14) (1993), 한국법사학회
- 제철웅, "단체와 법인: 사회적기능의 유사성과 적용법리의 상의의합리적 조정을 위한 시론", 민사법학, (36), pp.91~126 (2007), 한국민사법학회
- 제철웅, "정부의 “민법중개정법률안”의 평가: 민법총칙 중 法人法을 중심으로", 재산법연구, 21(2), pp.1~17 (2005), 한국재산법학회
- 山田誠一, "團體, 共同所有, および, 共同債權關係", 民法講座, 別(1) (1990)
- Werner Flume, "권리능력 없는 사단(Der nichtechtsfaehige Verein)", 단국법학, 6 (1997)
- "법무부 홈페이지 입법예고 게시판"[URL]