집합건물 구분소유권에 관한 소고
A Study on the Divided Ownership of Aggregate Buildings
0
조회
0
다운로드
10
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The unit ownership of a building represent the right to occupy a portion of the building as a separate dwelling, store, office, etc. The buildings with multi-unit ownerships are subdivided according to the intended purposes of them into apartment building, tenement house, store, or office building. Such buildings are as a whole call a Aggregate buildings. For being a Aggregate buildings, it needs to independent object factors of structure and using, and to subjective factors of divided owner’s intention. Now days, these subjective factors become more important. There are some arguments that these Aggregate buildings’ property for divided own is kind of joint ownership such as sharing, joint ownership, and gesamteigentum because of a corporation act characteristic or has new properties which are unlike ordinary sharing, joint ownership, and gesamteigentum. However, it is not a new type of ownership but a sole ownership like existing ownership. Our Aggregate buildings’ law referred to European countries’ and Japanese one. However, since the roman, because of principle that building is belong to land, European tried to understand that the Aggregate buildings, the building and land formed as one thing , is a new different type of Reality. During accept the Aggregate buildings, hard law theory and many chimerical rules are made. According to our law, we have understudied that land and buildings are different things and have registered that way. So, I can sure that Aggregate buildings’ exclusively part, common area, and land can be batch together for registering one stuff in Korea. If we reflect our law’s property and use advanced IT, we can post register of Aggregate buildings more accurately. If registration act and Aggregate buildings act are revised, Aggregate buildings trade security will improve. So, market can gain high trust.
Abstract
The unit ownership of a building represent the right to occupy a portion of the building as a separate dwelling, store, office, etc. The buildings with multi-unit ownerships are subdivided according to the intended purposes of them into apartment building, tenement house, store, or office building. Such buildings are as a whole call a Aggregate buildings. For being a Aggregate buildings, it needs to independent object factors of structure and using, and to subjective factors of divided owner’s intention. Now days, these subjective factors become more important. There are some arguments that these Aggregate buildings’ property for divided own is kind of joint ownership such as sharing, joint ownership, and gesamteigentum because of a corporation act characteristic or has new properties which are unlike ordinary sharing, joint ownership, and gesamteigentum. However, it is not a new type of ownership but a sole ownership like existing ownership. Our Aggregate buildings’ law referred to European countries’ and Japanese one. However, since the roman, because of principle that building is belong to land, European tried to understand that the Aggregate buildings, the building and land formed as one thing , is a new different type of Reality. During accept the Aggregate buildings, hard law theory and many chimerical rules are made. According to our law, we have understudied that land and buildings are different things and have registered that way. So, I can sure that Aggregate buildings’ exclusively part, common area, and land can be batch together for registering one stuff in Korea. If we reflect our law’s property and use advanced IT, we can post register of Aggregate buildings more accurately. If registration act and Aggregate buildings act are revised, Aggregate buildings trade security will improve. So, market can gain high trust.
참고문헌 (24)
- 강혁신, "공동주택에서의 전유부분 사용방법과 '공동의 이익'에 관한 연구", 법학연구, (24), pp.85~101 (2006), 한국법학회
- 고상룡, "물권법" (2001), 법문사
- 곽윤직, "민법주해(Ⅴ)" (2005), 박영사
- 곽윤직, "물권법" (1992), 박영사
- 김교창, "아파트입주자대표회의의 법적 지위", 법률신문, ~ (2006)
- 김기정, "집합건물의 집행을 둘러싼 몇 가지 법률문제에 대한 고찰" (1996), 사법논집
- 김상용, "물권법" (2000), 법문사
- 김선이, "집합건물법상의 제문제", 성균관법학, 16(1), pp.1~34 (2004), 법학연구소
- 김준호, "집합건물의 구분소유권에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.1984
- 김증한, "물권법" (1998), 박영사
- 김황식, "집합건물의 공용부분에 관한 등기" (1988), 재판자료 제44집
- 박종두, "집합건물법" (2011), 삼영사
- 박종, "물권법" (2002), 삼영사
- 박태신, "집합건물의 관리에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.2007
- 양경욱, "건물의 구분소유에 관한 법률문제", 사법논집, 16 (1985), 법원행정처
- 유석주, "부동산 공시법" (2002), 법문사
- 이기용, "구분소유의 성립에 관한 고찰", 성균관법학, 17(3), pp.253~282 (2005), 법학연구소
- 이수엽, "집합건물 구분소유의 개념과 내용" (1986), 서울지방변호사회
- 이춘원, "건물의 구분소유에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.2005
- 전병익, "집합주택의 구분소유법리에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.1983
- 최종길, "집합주택의 구분소유에 관한 비교법적 실태적 고찰", 서울대법학, 11 (1970)
- 황적인, "주석민법(Ⅱ)" (1996), 법원사
- 原島重義, "民法講義2 物權" (1979), 有斐閣
- 川島武宜, "註釋民法7 物權2" (1968), 有斐閣
