본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

가정 및 학교에서의 아동체벌에 관한 국제인권기준 분석 및 국내법 검토

Analysis on International Human Rights Law and Korean Law of Corporal Punishment of Children in Families and Schools

장민영
중앙법학회 (Chung-Ang Law Association)|2013.09|중앙법학 (CHUNG_ANG LAW REVIEW)|제15권 제3호|pp. 7-56|DOI 10.21759/caulaw.2013.15.3.7

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

국제인권법아동권리협약international human rights law초·중등교육법Convention on the Rights of the Child아동권리위원회아동체벌corporal punishment of childrenAct on Elementary and Secondary EducationCommittee of the Rights of the Child
주제분류법학

초록

International standards of children's rights have moved towards eradicating physical punishment of children by parents and teachers. Universal human rights treaties, such as the Convention on the Rights of the Child, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, and the Convention against Torture and other Cruel, Inhuman, or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, are interpreted towards banning corporal punishment of children at home and at school. Regional human rights treaties, including the European Social Charter (Revised), the European Convention on Human Rights, the American Convention on Human Rights, the African Charter on the Rights and Welfare of the Child, are also considered legal grounds against corporal punishment of children in family and educational settings. Furthermore, universal and regional human rights treaty bodies strongly require states parties to take all measures to end corporal punishment of children in families and schools. Recently, Korea shows ground-breaking development with regard to corporal punishment of children in educational settings. Corporal punishment of children has been used as one of the most popular disciplinary methods in Korean families and schools for hundreds of years. However, Korea's Act on Elementary and Secondary Education and its Enforcement Decree started prohibiting direct corporal punishment of children in schools from 2011. However, this development is not sufficient for complying with the international human rights standards of corporal punishment of children. Direct corporal punishment is still inflicted of elementary and secondary school students in practice even after its legal prohibition. Korea's educational law does not provide any limitation on indirect corporal punishment of students. There is little discussion on parental corporal punishment in Korea. Worst of all, children's fundamental rights or human rights in terms of their physical integrity are not respected in Korea. Therefore, this article proposes three solutions to improve Korean law and practice of corporal punishment of children in families and schools, in comparison to international human rights law of corporal punishment of children. First, this article suggests that Korean society, particularly Korean courts and academic community, should pay attention to children's rights which are guaranteed under the Korean Constitution and the international human rights treaties Korea has ratified with regard to children's freedom from corporal punishment. Second, this article emphasizes importance of government campaigns to raise public awareness against corporal punishment of children. Third, this article presents three-phased legal reforms with regard to corporal punishment of children. The first-phased legal reform relates to revision of the Constitution. The second-phased legal reform relates to enactment of the Act on Children's Human Rights. The third-phased legal reform relates to revision of the current Act on Elementary and Secondary Education and the current Civil Act. These legal reforms include clear prohibition of direct corporal punishment of children, restriction on indirect corporal punishment of children, emphasis on responsibilities of families, schools and the State, and establishment of remedy systems.

Abstract

International standards of children's rights have moved towards eradicating physical punishment of children by parents and teachers. Universal human rights treaties, such as the Convention on the Rights of the Child, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, and the Convention against Torture and other Cruel, Inhuman, or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, are interpreted towards banning corporal punishment of children at home and at school. Regional human rights treaties, including the European Social Charter (Revised), the European Convention on Human Rights, the American Convention on Human Rights, the African Charter on the Rights and Welfare of the Child, are also considered legal grounds against corporal punishment of children in family and educational settings. Furthermore, universal and regional human rights treaty bodies strongly require states parties to take all measures to end corporal punishment of children in families and schools. Recently, Korea shows ground-breaking development with regard to corporal punishment of children in educational settings. Corporal punishment of children has been used as one of the most popular disciplinary methods in Korean families and schools for hundreds of years. However, Korea's Act on Elementary and Secondary Education and its Enforcement Decree started prohibiting direct corporal punishment of children in schools from 2011. However, this development is not sufficient for complying with the international human rights standards of corporal punishment of children. Direct corporal punishment is still inflicted of elementary and secondary school students in practice even after its legal prohibition. Korea's educational law does not provide any limitation on indirect corporal punishment of students. There is little discussion on parental corporal punishment in Korea. Worst of all, children's fundamental rights or human rights in terms of their physical integrity are not respected in Korea. Therefore, this article proposes three solutions to improve Korean law and practice of corporal punishment of children in families and schools, in comparison to international human rights law of corporal punishment of children. First, this article suggests that Korean society, particularly Korean courts and academic community, should pay attention to children's rights which are guaranteed under the Korean Constitution and the international human rights treaties Korea has ratified with regard to children's freedom from corporal punishment. Second, this article emphasizes importance of government campaigns to raise public awareness against corporal punishment of children. Third, this article presents three-phased legal reforms with regard to corporal punishment of children. The first-phased legal reform relates to revision of the Constitution. The second-phased legal reform relates to enactment of the Act on Children's Human Rights. The third-phased legal reform relates to revision of the current Act on Elementary and Secondary Education and the current Civil Act. These legal reforms include clear prohibition of direct corporal punishment of children, restriction on indirect corporal punishment of children, emphasis on responsibilities of families, schools and the State, and establishment of remedy systems.

참고문헌 (106)

  1. CBS, "여기는 시사자키 정관용입니다", 곽노현 인터뷰, ~ (2012)
  2. 경기도교육청, "간접체벌에 대해서 어떻게 생각하십니까?", 경기교육, (190) (2012), 경기도교육청
  3. 교육부, "학교문화 선진화 방안 (2011. 1. 17일)", ~ (2011)
  4. 교총, "KEDI 통계 2011 (2011. 12월)", ~ (2011)
  5. 국가인권위원회, "초·중등교육법시행령 일부 개정령안‘에 대한 의견표명 (2011. 3. 3일)", ~ (2011)
  6. 국가인권위원회, "초·중·고등학교 인권교육 실태조사 (2011. 10월)", ~ (2011)
  7. 김선영, "중학교 체벌 실태와 인식에 관한 연구 : 교사, 학생, 학부모 대상으로", 석사, 교육경영및평생교육, pp.2006
  8. 김정환, "교육철학적 측면에서 본 체벌론", 새교육, (346) (1983), 한국교육연합회
  9. 남원희, "아동이 지각한 어머니의 체벌실태와 아동의 분노표현", 석사, 아동학, pp.2003
  10. 박찬주, "條例制定權의 根據와 範圍", 서울대학교 법학, 50(1), pp.483~534 (2009), 법학연구소
  11. 박철현, "지각된 체벌의 정당성, 사회유대, 그리고 학생의 대항행동", 형사정책연구, 23(1)통권 : 89, pp.355~383 (2012), 한국형사정책연구원
  12. 서울시 교육청, "학생인권조례 설명자료 (2012. 1. 31일)", ~ (2012)
  13. 성낙인, "헌법학" (2012), 法文社
  14. 이재창, "심리학적 측면에서 본 체벌론", 새교육, (346) (1983), 한국교육연합회
  15. 정재훈, "교사의 체벌실태를 통한 인식 조사 : 울산광역시 중·고등학교를 중심으로", 석사, 일반사회교육, pp.2006
  16. 조동섭, "체벌의 교육적 의미와 한계", 초등교육연구, 14(2) (2001), 한국초등교육학회
  17. 헌법재판소, "국제조약과 헌법재판", 헌법재판소, ~ (2007)
  18. ACERWC, "Concluding Recommendations: Egypt", ~
  19. ACERWC, "Concluding Recommendations: Kenya", ~
  20. ACERWC, "Concluding Recommendations: Nigeria", ~
  21. ACERWC, "Statement on Violence against Children (April 2011)", ~ (2011)
  22. Akemi Tomoda, "Reduced Prefrontal Cortical Gray matter Volume in Young Adults Exposed to Harsh Corporal Punishment", Neuroimage (2009)
  23. CAT Committee, "Concluding Observations of the Committee against Torture: Belgium", CAT, BEL, pp.CO, 2[DOI]
  24. CAT Committee, "Concluding Observations of the Committee against Torture: Ireland", CAT, IRL, pp.CO, 1[DOI]
  25. CAT Committee, "Concluding Observations of the Committee against Torture: Serbia", CAT, SRB, pp.CO, 1[DOI]
  26. CAT Committee, "Concluding Observations of the Committee against Torture: Slovakia", CAT, SVK, pp.CO, 2[DOI]
  27. CAT Committee, "Concluding Observations of the Committee against Torture: Slovenia", CAT, SVN, pp.CO, 3[DOI]
  28. CESCR, "Concluding Observations of the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: Ethiopia", E, ETH, pp.CO, 1-3[DOI]
  29. CESCR, "Concluding Observations of the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: Poland", E, POL, pp.CO, 5[DOI]
  30. CESCR, "Concluding Observations of the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: The Kingdom of Netherlands, E", C.12, CO, pp.4-5[DOI]
  31. CESCR, "Concluding Observations of the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: Turkey", E, TUR, pp.CO, 1[DOI]
  32. "COE Commissioner for Human Rights Children and Corporal Punishment: The Right Not to be Hit, Also a Children's Right, CommDH", IssuePaper(2006) 1REV7, 2008
  33. COE Committee of Ministers, "Recommendation on Policy to Support Positive Parenting", Rec, ~ (2006)
  34. COE Council of Ministers, "Recommendation on Policy to Support Positive Parenting", Rec(2006)19 Appendix Ⅰ, ~ (2006)
  35. COE Council of Ministers, "Recommendation on Violence in the Family", R(85)4, ~ (1985)
  36. COE Council of Ministers, "Recommendation on Social Measures concerning Violence within the Family", R(90)2, ~ (1990)
  37. COE Council of Ministers, "Recommendation on: Integrated National Strategies for the Protection of Children from Violence", CM, 2009
  38. COE, "Abolishing Corporal Punishment of Children", ~ (2007)
  39. "Committee on the Rights of the Child", CRC, ~, pp.CRC (2003), C[DOI]
  40. "Committee on the Rights of the Child", CRC, ~, pp.CRC (2012), C[DOI]
  41. Committee on the Rights of the Child, "Concluding Observations: Republic of Korea", CRC, 15, pp.Add.511, 1996[DOI]
  42. Committee on the Rights of the Child, "General Comment No. 13: The Right of the Child to Freedom from All Forms of Violence", CRC, GC, pp.13, 2011[DOI]
  43. Committee on the Rights of the Child, "General Comment No. 14 (2013) on the Right of the Child to Have His or Her Best Interests Taken as a Primary Consideration (Art. 3 Para. 1)", CRC, GC, pp.14, 2013[DOI]
  44. Committee on the Rights of the Child, "General Comment No. 1: The Aims of Education", CRC, 2001, pp.1, 2001[DOI]
  45. Committee on the Rights of the Child, "General Comment No. 7: Implementing Child Rights in Early Childhood", CRC, GC, pp.7, Rev.1[DOI]
  46. Committee on the Rights of the Child, "General Comment No. 8: The Right of the Child to Protection from Corporal Punishment and other Cruel and Degrading Forms of Punishment", CRC, GC, pp.8, 2007[DOI]
  47. ESCR, "General Comment No. 13: The Right to Education (article 13 of the Covenant)", E, 1999, pp.10, 1999[DOI]
  48. Elizabeth Thompson Gershoff, "Corporal Punishment by Parents and Associated Child Behaviors and Experiences: A Mete-Analytic and Theoretical Review", Psychological Bulletin, 128 (2002)
  49. Eric Pl Slade, "Spanking in Early Childhood and Later Behavior Problems: A Prospective Study of Infants and Young Toddlers", Pediatrics, 113(5) (2004)
  50. "Global Initiative to End All Corporal Punishment of Children, Global Progress towards Prohibiting All Corporal Punishment", ~ (2012)
  51. Grazyna Kochanska, "The Emergence and Development of Conscience in Toddlerhood and Early Childhood, in Parenting and Children’s Internalization of Values: A Handbook of Contemporary Theory", ~ (1997)
  52. HRC, "Concluding Observations: Bulgaria", CCPR, BLR, pp.CO, 3[DOI]
  53. HRC, "Concluding Observations: Jamaica", CCPR, JAM, pp.CO, 3[DOI]
  54. HRC, "Concluding Observations: Kazakhstan", CCPR, KAZ, pp.CO, 1[DOI]
  55. HRC, "Concluding Observations: Mongolia", CCPR, MNG, pp.CO, 5[DOI]
  56. HRC, "Concluding Observations: Slovakia", CCPR, SVK, pp.CO, 3[DOI]
  57. HRC, "Concluding Observations: Yemen", CCPR, YEM, pp.CO, 5[DOI]
  58. HRC, "Concluding Observations: Zambia", CCPR, ZMB, pp.CO, 3[DOI]
  59. I, "A Commission", Juvenile Justice and Human Rights in the Americas, Ser.L, pp.Ⅴ, Ⅱ. Doc. 78[DOI]
  60. I, "A Commission on Human Rights", Report on Corporal Punishment and Human Rights of Children and Adolescents, Ser.L, pp.V, Ⅱ.135 Doc. 14[DOI]
  61. I, "A Court", Juridical Condition and Human Rights of the Child, 02, Series A No. 17, pp.2002, ~
  62. Jang, Min Young, "Challenges for Children's Rights in the Republic of Korea in the 21st Century", 박사, pp.2013
  63. Joan E. Durrant, "A Generation without Smacking: The Impact of Sweden’s Ban on Physical Punishment", Save the Children, ~ (2000)
  64. Joan E. Durrant, "Positive Parenting: What Is It and How to Do It", Save the Children, ~ (2011)
  65. Joan E. Gusec, "Impact of Parental Discipline Methods on the Child’s Internationalization of Values: Reconceptualization of Current Points of View", Developmental Psychology, 30 (1994)
  66. Murray A. Straus, "Beating the Devil out of them: Corporal Punishment in American Families and its Effects on Children", ~ (2001)
  67. Parliamentary Assembly of the COE, "Recommendation on Europe-wide Ban on Corporal Punishment of Children", Recommendation 1666, ~ (2004)
  68. Paulo Sérgio Pinheiro, "World Report on Violence against Children", UN Secretary General’s Study on Violence against Children, ~ (2006)
  69. Robert E. Larzelere, "Comparing Child Outcomes of Physical Punishment and Alternative Disciplinary Tactics: A Meta-Analysis", Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 8(1) (2005)
  70. "Save the Children, Educate, Don’t Punish", ~ (1999)
  71. UNODC, "Compilation of Evidence-based Family Skills Training Program", ~ (2009)
  72. 김윤선, "체벌에 야간자율학습 여전", 서울경제, 2012. 5. 4일, ~ (2012)
  73. 김호, "니킥부터 지시봉까지 막장체벌 공포의 고교", 뉴스1, 2012. 4. 6일, ~ (2012)
  74. 노준희, "공부 안한다 초등생에 회초리 90대", 내일신문, 2012. 6. 26일, ~ (2012)
  75. 배명재, "광주 대동고, 150명 몽둥이 체벌", 경향신문, 2011. 11. 27일, ~ (2011)
  76. 이동욱, "창원고교교사, 학생 뺨 때리는 동영상 파문", 경남도민일보, 2012. 4. 27일, ~ (2012)
  77. 이석영, "의사 63% 학교체벌 찬성한다", 의협신문, 2011. 5. 9일, ~ (2011)
  78. 장선욱, "광주 고교 자율학습 시간 떠들었다 학생 150명 집단체벌 논란", 국민일보, 2011. 11. 21일, ~ (2011)
  79. 헌법재판소, "1998. 7. 16. 선고, 97 헌바 23", 265~ (1998)
  80. 헌법재판소, "1998. 10. 29. 선고, 98 헌마 4 결정", ~ (1998)
  81. 헌법재판소, "2000. 4. 27. 선고, 98헌가16, 98헌마429(병합) 결정", ~ (2000)
  82. 헌법재판소, "2001. 4. 26. 선고, 99 헌가 13 결정", ~ (2001)
  83. 헌법재판소, "2004. 12. 16. 선고, 2002헌마478 결정", ~ (2004)
  84. 헌법재판소, "2006. 7. 27. 선고, 2005헌마1189 결정", ~ (2006)
  85. 헌법재판소, "2008. 12. 26. 선고, 2008헌마419 결정", ~ (2008)
  86. 헌법재판소, "2009. 10. 29. 선고, 2008헌마635 결정", ~ (2009)
  87. 헌법재판소, "2012. 5. 31. 선고, 2010헌바87 결정", ~ (2012)
  88. 대법원, "1988. 1. 12. 선고, 87다카2240 판결", ~ (1988)
  89. 대법원, "1991. 5. 28. 선고, 90다17972 판결", ~ (1991)
  90. 대법원, "2000. 4. 11. 선고 99다 44205 판결", ~ (2000)
  91. 대법원, "2000. 11. 24. 선고, 2000추29 판결", ~ (2000)
  92. 대법원, "2004. 6. 10. 선고 2001도5380 판결", ~ (2004)
  93. 대법원, "2004. 6. 19. 선고, 2001도5380 판결", ~ (2004)
  94. 대구지방법원, "1996. 12. 27일. 선고, 96노170 판결", ~ (1996)
  95. 인천지방법원, "2009. 4. 23. 선고, 2990고단1010 판결", ~ (2009)
  96. European Committee of Social Rights, "World Organization Against Torture (“OMCT”) v. Ireland", Complaint No. 18, 2005 (2003)
  97. European Committee of Social Rights, "World Organization Against Torture (“OMCT”) v. Greece", Complaint No. 17, 2005 (2003)
  98. European Committee of Social Rights, "World Organization Against Torture (“OMCT”) v. Belgium", Complaint No. 21, 2005 (2003)
  99. European Committee of Social Rights, "World Organization Against Torture (“OMCT”) v. Portugal", Complaint No. 34, 2006 (2006)
  100. European Court of Human Rights, "Campell and Cosans v. the United Kingdom", Application No. 7511, 76, pp.1982, ~
  101. European Court of Human Rights, "A. v. the United Kingdom", Application No. 25599, 1998
  102. I, "A Commission", Report No. 41, pp.1999, ~
  103. "Ingraham v Wright, 430 U.S. 669", ~ (1977)
  104. "Coleman v. Franklin Parish School Board, 702 F.2d 74", ~ (1983)
  105. "Cunningham v. Beavers, 858 F.2d 269", ~ (1998)
  106. "Thrasher v. General Casualty Co., 732 F. Supp. 966", ~ (1990)

관련 논문AI추천

‘체벌’ 금지에 대한 입법동향과 과제박정원, 이성흠대한교육법학회 · 교육법학연구2010 · 제22권 제2호한국 학교에서 아동권리협약의 적용과 과제 : 체벌 · 징계절차 · 표현의 자유를 중심으로표시열대한교육법학회 · 교육법학연구2008 · 제20권 제2호학생인권조례 이후 학교체벌의 허용 여부와 범위조국법학연구소 · 서울대학교 법학2013 · 제54권 제1호학교체벌 관련 국내법령과 주요국 법령의 비교 연구황준성대한교육법학회 · 교육법학연구2013 · 제25권 제2호아동의 권리와 가정내 아동체벌금지에 관한 헌법적 고찰이노홍법학연구소 · 홍익법학2015 · 제16권 제1호체벌 및 초중등교육법시행령 개정안의 위헌성 ― 학생인권·교육자치 훼손 문제를 중심으로 ―한상희민주주의법학연구회 · 민주법학2011 · 제45호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)

현행 집행관자격 부여 제도의 적정성에 관한 고찰김종호pp. 57-102전세권 저당권의 등기의 효력과 그 실행방법 -대법원 2008.3.13. 선고 2006다29372,29389 판결의 평석-황경웅pp. 103-137소년법상 화해권고제도의 현황분석과 개선과제황일호pp. 139-168범죄수사에 있어서 잠입수사관제도의 도입여부 -독일의 잠입수사관 투입제도를 중심으로-도중진pp. 169-200도로교통법 제54조 제1항 사고발생시 조치의무의 문제점김태수pp. 201-225
원문 보기