고전 문학 작품의 재번역 양상: 스탕달의 『적과 흑』을 중심으로
Study of retranslations of classic literature: Focusing on Stendhal’s Le Rouge et Le Noir
0
조회
0
다운로드
13
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper aims to explore the translation perspectives employed in the retranslation of classic literature. Literary classics are timeless and they are often retranslated for various reasons such as the change in target language and language rules, plagiarisms, repeated publications and the translator's unique perspective of the original text. Under the assumption that every translator reflects his/her unique perspective in his/her work, two Korean translations of Stendhal's Le Rouge et Le Noir were analyzed to identify the different translation perspectives. Because literary works are translated under the collaboration of the publisher and the translator, interviews were conducted to identify the translator's perspective and the environment in which the translation was done. A review of literary documents was also conducted to identify the stylistic devices of the original work. As a result, free indirect discourse, internal monologue and direct intervention of the author turned out to be important stylistic devices of the original work, and the translations.
Abstract
This paper aims to explore the translation perspectives employed in the retranslation of classic literature. Literary classics are timeless and they are often retranslated for various reasons such as the change in target language and language rules, plagiarisms, repeated publications and the translator's unique perspective of the original text. Under the assumption that every translator reflects his/her unique perspective in his/her work, two Korean translations of Stendhal's Le Rouge et Le Noir were analyzed to identify the different translation perspectives. Because literary works are translated under the collaboration of the publisher and the translator, interviews were conducted to identify the translator's perspective and the environment in which the translation was done. A review of literary documents was also conducted to identify the stylistic devices of the original work. As a result, free indirect discourse, internal monologue and direct intervention of the author turned out to be important stylistic devices of the original work, and the translations.
참고문헌 (18)
- 구스타브 랑송, "불문학사" (1997), 을유문화사
- 나병철, "소설의 이해" (1998), 문예출판사
- 박상익, "번역은 반역인가" (2006), 푸른역사
- 이상원, "한국 출판 번역 독자들의 번역 평가 규범 연구", 박사, pp.2005
- 임순정, "문학 작품의 재번역 현상 연구", 박사, pp.2009
- 전명수, "현대불어 자유간접화법의 한국어번역", 아시아문화연구, 2, pp.213~233 (2004), 경원대학교 아시아문화연구소
- 정혜용, "번역문학 비평을 위하여", 번역비평, pp.24~37 (2007)
- Berman, Antoine, "L‘Épreuve de l'étranger" (1984), Éditions Gallimard
- Blin, Georges, "Stendahl et les problèmes du roman" (1983), Librairie José Corti
- Gambier, Yves, "La retraduction, retour et detour", Meta, 39(3), pp.413~417 (1994)
- Seleskovitch, Danica, "Interpréter pour traduire" (1984), Publications de la Sorbonne Didier Erudition
- Steiner, George, "After Babel: Aspects of Language and Translation" (1975), Oxford University Press
- Van Den Broeck, Raymond, "Translational Interpretation. in: Translators' strategies and creativity", pp.1~13 (1995), John Benjamins
- Venuti, Lauwrence, "The Translator's Invisibility: A history of Translation" (1995), Routledge
- Stendhal, "Le Rouge et Le Noir", Éditions Garnier Frères
- 서정철, "적과 흑" (1975), 동서문화사
- 이동렬, "적과 흑" (2004), 민음사
- 이지영, "고전문학이 출판계 구원투수, 중앙일보", ~ (2008)