본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

중국인 화자가 발화한 한국어 파열음의 음향음성학적 특성

The acoustic and phonetic study of Korean plosive produced by Chinese speakers

1

조회

0

다운로드

25

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

This study generally analyses the pronunciation of Korean stops for Chinese speakers, comparing with Korean native speakers,in terms of acoustic and phonetic characteristics. Aiming at the reasons why Chinese speakers mispronounced Korean stops, this research creates an experimental comparison of stops located at two different positions in Korean words, word-initial and word-medial positions, produced by Chinese speakers and Korean native speakers respectively. The parameters used in this experiment, including the voice onset time for frication at both the word-initial and word-medial positions, starting pitch value of stops-following vowels, and closure duration in the word-medial position, are measured and computed by PRAAT. Statistically speaking, as the experiment is running between 66 Chinese speakers and 18 Korean native speakers, we can draw a relatively accurate conclusion: with all the stops that Chinese speakers produced, in terms of acoustic and phonetic features, the fortis /ㄲ, ㅃ, ㄸ/ are similar with those which phonated by Korean native speakers, however lax consonants /ㄱ, ㅂ, ㄷ/ and aspiration /ㅋ, ㅍ, ㅌ/ are not. To illustrate this observation, we figured that, in order to distinguish the difference between lax consonants and aspiration, Chinese speakers deliberately pronounce the lax consonants /ㄱ, ㅂ, ㄷ/ in a higher pitch value (even as high as the pitch value of aspiration pronounced by Korean native speakers). In addition, the starting pitch value of the vowel after /ㅂ, ㅃ, ㅍ/ is lower the rather that after /ㄱ, ㄲ, ㅋ/, /ㄷ, ㄸ, ㅌ/, thus we assume that Chinese speakers would mispronounce /ㅂ, ㅃ, ㅍ/ more. Based on the fact being discovered in the experiment, we figured that the mispronouncing phenomenon that we mentioned earlier accounts for the difference between Chinese and Korean phonological system. Generally speaking, there are two distinctive consonants instead of three in Mandarin stops system, therefore, most Chinese speakers tend to be more sensitive to the existence of aspirations, which leads to the mispronouncing.

Abstract

This study generally analyses the pronunciation of Korean stops for Chinese speakers, comparing with Korean native speakers,in terms of acoustic and phonetic characteristics. Aiming at the reasons why Chinese speakers mispronounced Korean stops, this research creates an experimental comparison of stops located at two different positions in Korean words, word-initial and word-medial positions, produced by Chinese speakers and Korean native speakers respectively. The parameters used in this experiment, including the voice onset time for frication at both the word-initial and word-medial positions, starting pitch value of stops-following vowels, and closure duration in the word-medial position, are measured and computed by PRAAT. Statistically speaking, as the experiment is running between 66 Chinese speakers and 18 Korean native speakers, we can draw a relatively accurate conclusion: with all the stops that Chinese speakers produced, in terms of acoustic and phonetic features, the fortis /ㄲ, ㅃ, ㄸ/ are similar with those which phonated by Korean native speakers, however lax consonants /ㄱ, ㅂ, ㄷ/ and aspiration /ㅋ, ㅍ, ㅌ/ are not. To illustrate this observation, we figured that, in order to distinguish the difference between lax consonants and aspiration, Chinese speakers deliberately pronounce the lax consonants /ㄱ, ㅂ, ㄷ/ in a higher pitch value (even as high as the pitch value of aspiration pronounced by Korean native speakers). In addition, the starting pitch value of the vowel after /ㅂ, ㅃ, ㅍ/ is lower the rather that after /ㄱ, ㄲ, ㅋ/, /ㄷ, ㄸ, ㅌ/, thus we assume that Chinese speakers would mispronounce /ㅂ, ㅃ, ㅍ/ more. Based on the fact being discovered in the experiment, we figured that the mispronouncing phenomenon that we mentioned earlier accounts for the difference between Chinese and Korean phonological system. Generally speaking, there are two distinctive consonants instead of three in Mandarin stops system, therefore, most Chinese speakers tend to be more sensitive to the existence of aspirations, which leads to the mispronouncing.

참고문헌 (16)

  1. 레이레이, "중국인 화자가 발화한 한국어 파찰음의 음향음성학적 특성", 음성음운형태론연구, 16(3), pp.383~400 (2010), 한국음운론학회
  2. 배재연, "음성 환경에 따른 한국어 폐쇄음의음향적 특징: 시간적 특성을 중심으로", 음성과학, 5(2), pp.139~159 (1999), 한국음성학회
  3. 이경희, "한국어 파열음의 음향적 특성과 지각 단서", 음성과학, 7(2), pp.139~155 (2000), 한국음성학회
  4. 이현복, "중국어 음성학", pp.53~55 (2009), 교육과학사
  5. 장우혁, "중국어 화자가 발음한 한국어 파열음의 음향적 특성", 언어연구, 26(3), pp.91~109 (2009), 언어정보연구소
  6. 장향실, "중국어 모국어 화자의 한국어 학습시 나타나는 발음상의 오류와 그 교육 방안", 한국어학, 15, pp.10~228 (2002), 한국어학회
  7. 정명숙, "한국어 학습자를 위한 전략적 발음 교육 -중국인 학습자를 중심으로-", 한국어학, 38, pp.345~369 (2008), 한국어학회
  8. 추이진단, "중국어권 한국어 학습자를 위한 자음 접근방법", 한국학논집, 31, pp.215~232 (2004), 계명대학교 한국학연구원.
  9. 한성우, "중국어권 학습자를 위한 맞춤형 한국어 발음 교육 방안", 우리말글, 44, pp.165~194 (2008), 우리말글학회
  10. 高美淑, "漢韓塞音塞擦音的對比實驗研究", 漢語學習, 4, pp.51~54 (2001), 北北北北北北.
  11. CHO, TAEHONG, "Acousticand aerodynamic correlates of Korean stops and fricatives", Journal ofphonetics, 30, pp.193~228 (2002)
  12. HAN, JEONG-IM, "The Phonetics and Phonology of Tense and Plainconsonants in Korean", 박사, pp.1996
  13. 강현숙, "Closure Duration and Pitch as Phonetic Cues to Korean Stop Identity in AP-medial Position: Perception Test", 음성과학, 14(4), pp.25~39 (2007), 한국음성과학회
  14. JUN, SUN-AH, "The Status of Lenis Stop Voicing Rule in Korean", pp.239~251 (1994), Stanford University Press
  15. "The Accentual Phrase in the Korean ProsodicHierarchy", Phonology, 15, pp.189~226 (1998)
  16. SILVA, DAVID, "The Phonetics and Phonology of Stop Lenition inKorean", 박사, pp.1992

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)