의미해석에 따른 총칭표현의 영한번역방법
English-Korean Translation Methods of Generic Expressions Based on Interpretations
1
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Sentences are interpreted in a single domain even if they belong to different languages. Hence, the translational problem of non-equivalence may be rephrased in the way that sentences of different languages have different morpho-syntactic forms in spite of their equal references. In this study, we aim to approach the non-equivalence problem related with generic sentences. Generic sentences are divided into several categories depending on their denotational properties: kind, subkind, characterizing generic, and normative generic sentences. In part of these categories, English and Korean show different syntactic properties, raising a non-equivalence problem: semantic properties related with plurality may or may not be reflected in English and Korean grammars. To cope with this problem, we overview the syntactic properties of English and Korean generic sentences and suggest translational methods based on the comparative results.
Abstract
Sentences are interpreted in a single domain even if they belong to different languages. Hence, the translational problem of non-equivalence may be rephrased in the way that sentences of different languages have different morpho-syntactic forms in spite of their equal references. In this study, we aim to approach the non-equivalence problem related with generic sentences. Generic sentences are divided into several categories depending on their denotational properties: kind, subkind, characterizing generic, and normative generic sentences. In part of these categories, English and Korean show different syntactic properties, raising a non-equivalence problem: semantic properties related with plurality may or may not be reflected in English and Korean grammars. To cope with this problem, we overview the syntactic properties of English and Korean generic sentences and suggest translational methods based on the comparative results.
참고문헌 (17)
- Burton-Roberts, N, "Generic Sentences and Analyticity", Studies in Language, 1, pp.155~196 (1977)
- Carlson, G, "Reference to Kinds in English", 박사, pp.1977
- Carlson, G, "Properties, Types and Meaning", pp.167~191 (1989), Dordrecht
- Chierchia, G, "Events and Grammar", pp.53~103 (1998), Kluwer
- Chierchia, G, "Reference to Kinds across Languages", Natural Language and Semantics, 6, pp.339~405 (1998)
- Cohen, A, "On the Generic Use of Indefinite Singulars", Journal of Semantics, 18, pp.183~209 (2001)
- Corbett, G, "Number" (2000), Cambridge University Press
- Dayal, V, "Number Marking and (In)definiteness in Kind Terms", Linguistics and Philosophy, 27, pp.393~450 (2004)
- Diesing, M, "Indefiniteness" (1992), MIT Press
- Gerstner, C, "Handbuch der Syntax", pp.966~978 (1993), Gruyter
- Kratzer, A, "The Generic Book", pp.125~175 (1995), The University of Chicago Press
- Krifka, M, "The Generic Book", pp.1~124 (1995), The Univ. of Chicago Press
- 곽은주, "An Analysis of Korean Generic Interpretations", 언어, 34(2), pp.221~242 (2009), 한국언어학회
- Lawer, J, "Studies in English Generics", University of Michigan Papers in Linguistics, 1 (1973)
- Nemoto, N, "On Mass Denotations of Bare Nouns in Japanese and Korean", Linguistics, 43, pp.383~413 (2005)
- Quirk, R, "A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language" (1985), Longman
- Wilkinson, K, "Studies in the Semantics of Generic NP’s", 박사, pp.1991