본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Comparison of Quantitation of Cytomegalovirus DNA by Real-Time PCR in Whole Blood with the Cytomegalovirus Antigenemia Assay

2

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류병리학

초록

Background: Quantitation of cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA using real-time PCR has been utilized for monitoring CMV infection. However, the CMV antigenemia assay is still the ‘gold standard’ assay. There are only a few studies in Korea that compared the efficacy of use of real-time PCR for quantitation of CMV DNA in whole blood with the antigenemia assay, and most of these studies have been limited to transplant recipients. Method: 479 whole blood samples from 79 patients, falling under different disease groups, were tested by real-time CMV DNA PCR using the Q-CMV real-time complete kit (Nanogen Advanced Diagnostic S.r.L., Italy) and CMV antigenemia assay (CINA Kit, ArgeneBiosoft, France), and the results were compared. Repeatedly tested patients were selected and their charts were reviewed for ganciclovir therapy. Results: The concordance rate of the two assays was 86.4% (Cohen’s kappa coefficient value=0.659). Quantitative correlation between the two assays was a moderate (r=0.5504, P<0.0001). Among 20 patients tested repeatedly with the two assays, 13 patients were transplant recipients and treated with ganciclovir. Before treatment, CMV was detected earlier by real-time CMV DNA PCR than the antigenemia assay, with a median difference of 8 days. After treatment, the antigenemia assay achieved negative results earlier than real-time CMV DNA PCR with a median difference of 10.5 days. Conclusions: Q-CMV real-time complete kit is a useful tool for early detection of CMV infection in whole blood samples in transplant recipients.

Abstract

Background: Quantitation of cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA using real-time PCR has been utilized for monitoring CMV infection. However, the CMV antigenemia assay is still the ‘gold standard’ assay. There are only a few studies in Korea that compared the efficacy of use of real-time PCR for quantitation of CMV DNA in whole blood with the antigenemia assay, and most of these studies have been limited to transplant recipients. Method: 479 whole blood samples from 79 patients, falling under different disease groups, were tested by real-time CMV DNA PCR using the Q-CMV real-time complete kit (Nanogen Advanced Diagnostic S.r.L., Italy) and CMV antigenemia assay (CINA Kit, ArgeneBiosoft, France), and the results were compared. Repeatedly tested patients were selected and their charts were reviewed for ganciclovir therapy. Results: The concordance rate of the two assays was 86.4% (Cohen’s kappa coefficient value=0.659). Quantitative correlation between the two assays was a moderate (r=0.5504, P<0.0001). Among 20 patients tested repeatedly with the two assays, 13 patients were transplant recipients and treated with ganciclovir. Before treatment, CMV was detected earlier by real-time CMV DNA PCR than the antigenemia assay, with a median difference of 8 days. After treatment, the antigenemia assay achieved negative results earlier than real-time CMV DNA PCR with a median difference of 10.5 days. Conclusions: Q-CMV real-time complete kit is a useful tool for early detection of CMV infection in whole blood samples in transplant recipients.

참고문헌 (23)

  1. Paya CV, "Prevention of cytomegalovirus disease in recipients of solid-organ transplants", Clin Infect Dis, 32, pp.596~603 (2001)
  2. Boeckh M, "Quantitation of cytomegalovirus: methodologic aspects and clinical applications", Clin Microbiol Rev, 11, pp.533~554 (1998)
  3. Allice T, "Evaluation of a novel real-time PCR system for cytomegalovirus DNA quantitation on whole blood and correlation with pp65-antigen test in guiding pre-emptive antiviral treatment", J Virol Methods, 148, pp.9~16 (2008)
  4. Guiver M, "Evaluation of CMV viral load using TaqMan CMV quantitative PCR and comparison with CMV antigenemia in heart and lung transplant recipients", Transplantation, 71, pp.1609~1615 (2001)
  5. Camargo LF, "Comparison between antigenemia and a quantitative-competitive polymerase chain reaction for the diagnosis of cytomegalovirus infection after heart transplantation", Transplantation, 71, pp.412~417 (2001)
  6. Heid CA, "Realtime quantitative PCR", Genome Res, 6, pp.986~994 (1996)
  7. 최수미, "Comparison of Quantitative Cytomegalovirus Real-time PCR in Whole Blood and pp65 Antigenemia Assay: Clinical Utility of CMV Real-time PCR in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients", Journal of Korean Medical Science, 24(4), pp.571~578 (2009), 대한의학회
  8. Marchetti S, "Comparison of real-time PCR and pp65 antigen assays for monitoring the development of Cytomegalovirus disease in recipients of solid organ and bone marrow transplants", New Microbiol, 34, pp.157~164 (2011)
  9. Ljungman P, "Definitions of cytomegalovirus infection and disease in transplant recipients", Clin Infect Dis, 34, pp.1094~1097 (2002)
  10. Paya CV, "Preemptive use of oral ganciclovir to prevent cytomegalovirus infection in liver transplant patients: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial", J Infect Dis, 185, pp.854~860 (2002)
  11. Kotton CN, "Updated international consensus guidelines on the management of cytomegalovirus in solid-organ transplantation", Transplantation, 96, pp.333~360 (2013)
  12. Griffiths PD, "The challenge of CMV infection and disease in transplantation", Recommendations from the International Herpes Management Forum (IHMF) Managements Strategies Workshop and 8th Annual Meeting of the IHMF (2000), Cambridge Medical Publications
  13. Lilleri D, "Clinically-based determination of safe DNAemia cutoff levels for preemptive therapy or human cytomegalovirus infections in solid organ and hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients", J Med Virol, 73, pp.412~418 (2004)
  14. Razonable RR, "The clinical use of various blood compartments for cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA quantitation in transplant recipients with CMV disease", Transplantation, 73, pp.968~973 (2002)
  15. Von Müller L, "High variability between results of different in-house tests for cytomegalovirus (CMV) monitoring and a standardized quantitative plasma CMV PCR assay", J Clin Microbiol, 40, pp.2285~2287 (2002)
  16. 허운보, "거대세포바이러스 정량 검출을 위한 BiosewoomTM Real-Q CytomegalovirusQuantification kit 평가", Annals of Laboratory Medicine, 27(4), pp.298~304 (2007), 대한진단검사의학회
  17. Li H, "Measurement of human cytomegalovirus loads by quantitative real-time PCR for monitoring clinical intervention in transplant recipients", J Clin Microbiol, 41, pp.187~191 (2003)
  18. Kalpoe JS, "Validation of clinical application of cytomegalovirus plasma DNA load measurement and definition of treatment criteria by analysis of correlation to antigen detection", J Clin Microbiol, 42, pp.1498~1504 (2004)
  19. Mhiri L, "Comparison of pp65 antigenemia, quantitative PCR and DNA hybrid capture for detection of cytomegalovirus in transplant recipients and AIDS patients", J Virol Methods, 143, pp.23~28 (2007)
  20. Ghaffari SH, "Monitoring of cytomegalovirus reactivation in bone marrow transplant recipients by real-time PCR", Pathol Oncol Res, 14, pp.399~409 (2008)
  21. Pillet S, "Quantification of cytomegalovirus viral load", Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther, 12, pp.193~210 (2014)
  22. Kim DJ, "Real-time PCR assay compared with antigenemia assay for detecting cytomegalovirus infection in kidney transplant recipients", Transplant Proc, 39, pp.1458~1460 (2007)
  23. Rhee JY, "Clinical usefulness of plasma quantitative polymerase chain reaction assay: diagnosis of cytomegalovirus infection in kidney transplant recipients", Transplant Proc, 43, pp.2624~2629 (2011)

관련 논문AI추천

Performance Evaluation of the Real-Q Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Quantification Kit Using Two Real-Time PCR Systems for Quantifying CMV DNA in Whole Blood기창석, 김종원, 김지연, 박종은, 윤선애, 이명근, 허희재대한진단검사의학회 · Annals of Laboratory Medicine2016 · 제36권 제6호Comparison of Real-time PCR Methods and pp65 Antigenemia Assay to DetectCytomegalovirus Reactivation in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation김성순, 신완식, 이주실, 최병선, 최수미, Seon-Young Lee대한감염학회 · Infection and Chemotherapy2008 · 제40권 제3호Real-Time PCR과 일반 PCR을 이용한 Cytomegalovirus 정성검사의 비교 평가김문정, 김윤정, 배일권, 정석훈, 정세리대한임상미생물학회 · Annals of Clinical Microbiology2013 · 제16권 제1호거대세포바이러스 정량 검출을 위한 BiosewoomTM Real-Q CytomegalovirusQuantification kit 평가김명희, 김유리, 서장수, 오흥범, 원동일, 허운보대한진단검사의학회 · Annals of Laboratory Medicine2007 · 제27권 제4호인간 거대세포 바이러스 감염 진단을 위한 CMV 항원혈증 검사의 유용성 평가배재춘, 송운흥, 이남용, 이장호대한임상검사과학회 · 대한임상검사과학회지2000 · 제32권 제3호신장이식 환자에서 HCMV 항원혈증 검사의 임상적 유용성김탁, 김성한, 김송철, 김양수, 박관태, 박수길, 성홍섭, 우준희, 이상오, 최상호, 한덕종대한감염학회 · Infection and Chemotherapy2009 · 제41권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (35건)