한국 통역학 연구의 동향과 과제: 해외 연구 동향과의 비교를 기반으로
Trend and Challenges in Interpreting Studies Research in Korea: Basing on Comparison with Trend in Interpreting Studies Research Overseas
0
조회
0
다운로드
16
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The objective of this study is to analyze Korea’s current foothold in the field of interpreting studies research and present the future path through the use of comparison between the patterns in interpreting studies research in Korea and overseas. To this end, this study sets forth classification of research in interpreting studies, comparing and analyzing papers published in academic journals both at home and abroad. The time range of the corpus of analysis is from 1997 to 2015. The corpus for analysis is 600 studies including: 274 studies on interpretation published in three overseas academic journals, namely Interpreting, Meta and Translation and Interpreting studies; 298 studies on interpretation published in three local academic journals, namely Conference Interpretation and Translation, Interpreting and Translation Studies and The Journal of Translation Studies; and 28 studies on sign language interpretation registered on the Korea Education and Research Information Service (KERIS). Utilizing the classification of research, trend in research is quantitatively analyzed according to year, language, type and genre of interpretation, and scope and theme of research. The results are as follows: 1) Journals that are leading interpreting studies research are Conference Interpretation and Translation and Interpreting and Translation Studies in Korea and Interpreting overseas. Time analysis shows that interpretation related papers are consistently published in the leading journals, whereas great discrepancies exist in the number of interpretation related papers published in the non-leading journals depending on the publishing year; 2) Papers on sign language interpretation account for 9.85% in overseas journals, whereas the number stands at a mere 0.67% in Korea. This showcases the disconnection between research on sign language interpretation and oral language interpretation; 3) In researches that do not distinguish between simultaneous and consecutive modes of interpretation, conference interpretation and community interpretation account for similar proportions in researches abroad, whereas conference interpretation takes up a predominant share in Korea; 4) The analysis on the scope and sub-themes of studies on oral language interpretation shows that the most researched area overseas is descriptive interpreting studies, followed by application, general theory and partial theory, in this set order. In Korea, the most focused is application, followed by general technology, general theory and partial theory, in this order. The order for sign language interpretation research is consistent both at home and abroad, the most researched being general technology, followed by application, general theory and partial theory, in this order. However, the sub-themes of different scopes of studies varies both in the case of oral and sign language. The implications of the results of analysis and the future path that the Korean academia of interpretation should take are as follows. First, in function-oriented DIS, more attention should be given to the relationship among interpretation participants and the atmosphere of acceptance of interpretation. Second, efforts should be made to close the gap between diverging directions of research on oral and sign language interpretation. Third, effort should be made to fill the void that exist in the scope of research. Fourth, all boundaries in interpreting studies research including language format, interpretation mode and genre of interpretation should be dismantled.
Abstract
The objective of this study is to analyze Korea’s current foothold in the field of interpreting studies research and present the future path through the use of comparison between the patterns in interpreting studies research in Korea and overseas. To this end, this study sets forth classification of research in interpreting studies, comparing and analyzing papers published in academic journals both at home and abroad. The time range of the corpus of analysis is from 1997 to 2015. The corpus for analysis is 600 studies including: 274 studies on interpretation published in three overseas academic journals, namely Interpreting, Meta and Translation and Interpreting studies; 298 studies on interpretation published in three local academic journals, namely Conference Interpretation and Translation, Interpreting and Translation Studies and The Journal of Translation Studies; and 28 studies on sign language interpretation registered on the Korea Education and Research Information Service (KERIS). Utilizing the classification of research, trend in research is quantitatively analyzed according to year, language, type and genre of interpretation, and scope and theme of research. The results are as follows: 1) Journals that are leading interpreting studies research are Conference Interpretation and Translation and Interpreting and Translation Studies in Korea and Interpreting overseas. Time analysis shows that interpretation related papers are consistently published in the leading journals, whereas great discrepancies exist in the number of interpretation related papers published in the non-leading journals depending on the publishing year; 2) Papers on sign language interpretation account for 9.85% in overseas journals, whereas the number stands at a mere 0.67% in Korea. This showcases the disconnection between research on sign language interpretation and oral language interpretation; 3) In researches that do not distinguish between simultaneous and consecutive modes of interpretation, conference interpretation and community interpretation account for similar proportions in researches abroad, whereas conference interpretation takes up a predominant share in Korea; 4) The analysis on the scope and sub-themes of studies on oral language interpretation shows that the most researched area overseas is descriptive interpreting studies, followed by application, general theory and partial theory, in this set order. In Korea, the most focused is application, followed by general technology, general theory and partial theory, in this order. The order for sign language interpretation research is consistent both at home and abroad, the most researched being general technology, followed by application, general theory and partial theory, in this order. However, the sub-themes of different scopes of studies varies both in the case of oral and sign language. The implications of the results of analysis and the future path that the Korean academia of interpretation should take are as follows. First, in function-oriented DIS, more attention should be given to the relationship among interpretation participants and the atmosphere of acceptance of interpretation. Second, efforts should be made to close the gap between diverging directions of research on oral and sign language interpretation. Third, effort should be made to fill the void that exist in the scope of research. Fourth, all boundaries in interpreting studies research including language format, interpretation mode and genre of interpretation should be dismantled.
참고문헌 (34)
- 김정우, "한국 번역학 연구의 현황과 전망", 번역학연구, 6(2), pp.29~57 (2005), 한국번역학회
- 김혜림, "한국의 당대(1999-2013) 번역학 연구동향", 번역학연구, 14(5), pp.95~115 (2013), 한국번역학회
- 김훈밀, "통번역학 연구 문제점과 향후 방향" (2014), 한국외국어대학교 출판부
- 원종화, "국내 통역 연구의 어제와 오늘 그리고 내일 - 연구 패러다임 변화 중심으로 -", 번역학연구, 16(1), pp.35~64 (2015), 한국번역학회[DOI]
- 이연향, "통번학 입문" (2009), 이화여자대학교출판부
- 이향, "국내 번역학 연구 경향에 관한 일 고찰 -「통번역학 연구」게재 논문의 분류를 중심으로", 통번역학연구, 15, pp.341~362 (2011), 통번역연구소
- 이향, "통번역학 연구 현황과 향후 전망 I", pp.71~92 (2013), 한국문화사
- 정연일, "번역학 입문" (2006), 한국외국어대학교 출판부
- 정혜연, "통역학 개론" (2008), 한국문화사
- 정호정, "통번역학 연구 현황과 향후 전망 I", pp.3~69 (2013), 한국문화사
- 최희섭, "번역학연구의 현황과 국내문헌 인용 고찰", 번역학연구, 8(1), pp.323~346 (2007), 한국번역학회
- Angelelli, "‘A Crime in Another Language?’ An Analysis of the Interpreter’s Role in the Yousry Case", Translation and Interpreting Studies, 2(1), pp.47~82 (2007)
- Cecilia Wadensjö, "In and Off the Show: Co-constructing ‘invisibility’ in an Interpreter-Mediated Talk Show Interview", Meta, 53(1), pp.184~203 (2008)
- Cheung, Andrew K. F, "Scapegoating the interpreter for listeners’ dissatisfaction with their level of understanding: An experimental study", Interpreting, 17(1), pp.46~63 (2015)
- Gallez, Emmanuelle, "Orality and authenticity in an interpreter-mediated defendant’s examination: A case study from the Belgian Assize Court", Interpreting, 16(1), pp.49~80 (2014)
- Ingram, Robert, "Language interpretation and communication", pp.109~118 (1978), Pleuam Press
- Jeremy, Munday, "Introducing. Translation Studies : Theories and. Applications" (2001), Routledge
- J. Pan, "Advances in Research on Translator and Interpreter Training: A Review of Research articles in META", Meta, 60(2), pp.347~ (2015)
- J. X. Yan, "Studies on translator and interpreter training: a data-driven review of journal articles 2000-12", The Interpreter and Translator Trainer, 9(3), pp.263~286 (2015)
- Kayoko Takeda, "The Interpreter, the Monitor and the Language Arbiter", Meta, 54(2), pp.191~200 (2009)
- Kilian G. Seeber, "Betrayal – Vice or Virtue? An Ethical Perspective on Accuracy in Simultaneous Interpreting", Meta, 52(2), pp.290~298 (2007)
- Lee, Jieun, "Conflicting views on court interpreting examined through surveys of legal professionals and court interpreters", Interpreting, 11(1), pp.35~56 (2009)
- 임향옥, "A Meta-Analysis of Interpretation Research in Meta", 통역과 번역, 11(2), pp.183~217 (2009), 한국통역번역학회
- Lipkin, Shira L., "Norms, ethics and roles among military court interpreters: The unique case of the Yehuda Court", Interpreting, 10(1), pp.84~98 (2008)
- Luc Van Doorslaer, "he Indicative Power of A Key Word System. A Quantitative Analysis of the Key Words in the Translation Studies", Meta, 50(4), pp.1~4 (2005)
- Mason, Ian, "Power in face-to-face interpreting events", Translation and Interpreting Studies, 7(2), pp.234~253 (2012)
- Nadieh Rafice, "Translation Studies Orientations: A Case Study on Asian and European Journals", Linguistics and Literature Studies, 2(6), pp.178~190 (2014)
- Nikolay Garbovskiy, "Science of Translation Today: Change of Scientific Paradigm", Meta, 57(1), pp.48~66 (2012)
- Pöchhacker, Franz, "Conference interpreting; Surveying the profession", Translation and Interpreting Studies, 4(2), pp.172~186 (2009)
- Rudvin, Mette, "Professionalism and ethics in community interpreting: The impact of individualist versus collective group identity", Interpreting, 9(1), pp.47~69 (2007)
- Salevsky, H, "The Distinctive Nature of Interpreting Studies", Target, 5(2), pp.149~167 (1993)
- Tripepi Winteringham, Sarah, "The usefulness of ICTs in interpreting practice", The Interpreters’ Newsletter, 15, pp.87~99 (2010)
- Y. S. Lan, "Research Trend and Method in Translation Studies: A Comparison between Taiwanese and International Publications", Compilation and Translation Review, 2(2), pp.177~191 (2009)
- 許鈞, "中國飜譯硏究(1949-2009)" (2009), 上海外出語敎育出版社