본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

번역의 단계별 속성 및 번역주체에 대한 논의

On The Procedural Features and Subject of Translation

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류통역번역학

초록

Can we reasonably answer the question of whether the essence of translation lies in being individual or social? To tackle the question, this paper sheds light on the features of translation, detailing the step-by-step structure of translation, from the perspectives of recording, coding and creating that can be derived from the history of writing. In doing so, in the same line of reasoning, the present paper touches upon a couple of issues concerning how we identify the one who does in actual fact translation. The article presents the findings as follows: in World 1, as the first leg of translation, there are brute facts in terms of physical knowledge; in World 2, as the second step, there are social facts in terms of subjective knowledge; and in World 3, as the final stage, there are institutional facts in terms of objective knowledge. The paper concludes that the nature and subject of translation can be found in being social, rather than individual, and it is hoped that there should be further research in the sphere of translation-discourse.

Abstract

Can we reasonably answer the question of whether the essence of translation lies in being individual or social? To tackle the question, this paper sheds light on the features of translation, detailing the step-by-step structure of translation, from the perspectives of recording, coding and creating that can be derived from the history of writing. In doing so, in the same line of reasoning, the present paper touches upon a couple of issues concerning how we identify the one who does in actual fact translation. The article presents the findings as follows: in World 1, as the first leg of translation, there are brute facts in terms of physical knowledge; in World 2, as the second step, there are social facts in terms of subjective knowledge; and in World 3, as the final stage, there are institutional facts in terms of objective knowledge. The paper concludes that the nature and subject of translation can be found in being social, rather than individual, and it is hoped that there should be further research in the sphere of translation-discourse.

참고문헌 (10)

  1. 강지혜, "번역에 대한 제도적 관점의 중요성 고찰: ‘제도번역’ 개념을 중심으로", 번역학연구, 13(5), pp.7~32 (2012), 한국번역학회
  2. 최효은, "번역가 연구: 유형기, 본격 기독교 번역자", 번역학연구, 18(2), pp.229~253 (2017), 한국번역학회
  3. Anscombe, Elizabeth, "On brute fact", Analysis, 18(4), pp.69~72 (1958)
  4. Chesterman, Andrew, "Memes of Translation" (1997), Benjamins
  5. Ludwig, Otto, "Geschichte des Schreibens" (2006), Walter de Gruyter
  6. Popper, Karl, "Objective Knowledge" (1972), Clarendon
  7. Saussure, Ferdinand, "Course in General Linguistics" (1916), Duckworth
  8. Searle, John, "The Construction of Social Reality" (1995), Penguin
  9. Searle, John, "Speech Acts" (1969), Cambridge University Press
  10. Stubbs, Michael, "Words and Phrases" (2002), Blackwell

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)