도자기 분야 분류 체계 및 기본 용어의 번역에 관한 고찰
A Study on Classification in the Ceramics Field and Translation of Basic Terms
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper examines how the basic terms in the field of Korean ceramics are translated into English. Some SL terms were translated consistently while others were translated in varied ways, including some misleading translations. The errors resulted from two causes: non-symmetry in classification in the field between the two languages; and the ambiguity of basic concepts. In Korean art history, for example, “togi” can be used as a broad term to include earthenware and stoneware in the TL culture. But it can also refer only to earthenware, excluding stoneware and porcelain. In the former case, the SL terms “togi” and “dogi” are used interchangeably, while in the latter they have different conceptual delimitation. Also, when introducing Korean ceramics history, the conceptual structure of the field reflects the “time” factor that is not considered in the English conceptual structure, complicating the selection of appropriate TL terms. In sum, this paper seeks to show that the internal structure of what is ostensibly the same field may differ between two languages, and that the interlingual, conceptual gaps need to be considered in translation.
Abstract
This paper examines how the basic terms in the field of Korean ceramics are translated into English. Some SL terms were translated consistently while others were translated in varied ways, including some misleading translations. The errors resulted from two causes: non-symmetry in classification in the field between the two languages; and the ambiguity of basic concepts. In Korean art history, for example, “togi” can be used as a broad term to include earthenware and stoneware in the TL culture. But it can also refer only to earthenware, excluding stoneware and porcelain. In the former case, the SL terms “togi” and “dogi” are used interchangeably, while in the latter they have different conceptual delimitation. Also, when introducing Korean ceramics history, the conceptual structure of the field reflects the “time” factor that is not considered in the English conceptual structure, complicating the selection of appropriate TL terms. In sum, this paper seeks to show that the internal structure of what is ostensibly the same field may differ between two languages, and that the interlingual, conceptual gaps need to be considered in translation.
참고문헌 (25)
- 국립중앙박물관, "국립중앙박물관 전시 용어 - 미술사" (2006)
- 나선화, "한국의 전통 공예 도기" (2006), 이화여자대학교출판부
- 문화재청, "쉽게 고친 문화재용어 자료집" (2000), 문화재청
- 박미화, "국립현대미술관의 소장품 분류체계의 재정비와 기술지침", 국립현대미술관 연구논문, 6, pp.50~69 (2014)
- 박순봉, "중원 고구려비 영문안내판의 문법적 오류", 번역학연구, 10(3), pp.99~119 (2009), 한국번역학회[DOI]
- 박현주, "전문용어 생성 원칙의 번역학적 적용 —세계유산 개념 ‘serial properties’의 번역 용어 생성을 중심으로—", 번역학연구, 19(3), pp.135~162 (2018), 한국번역학회[DOI]
- 문화재용어 순화안, "문화재청", 문화재청 문화재용어 순화사업, ~ (1999)
- 유홍준, "문화재용어 순화안", pp.19~24 (1999)
- 이청규, "문화재용어 순화안", pp.11~13 (1999)
- 최희섭, "“경기전” 일대 영어안내판의 오류 분석: 보물과 유형문화재를 중심으로", 번역학연구, 10(1), pp.199~224 (2009), 한국번역학회[DOI]
- 최희섭, "문화재청 홈페이지의 국보 명칭 영문 번역 고찰", 번역학연구, 11(1), pp.271~291 (2010), 한국번역학회[DOI]
- "Terminology Variation: On the Concept of Synonymy in the Light of an Interlingual Analysis of a Terminology Field’, in Terminológia v odbornom preklade" (2008)[URL]
- International Standard Organization, "ISO 704: 2009. Terminology work - Principles and methods", ~ (2009)
- The Metropolitan Museum of Art, "The Arts of Korea: A Resource for Educators" (2001)
- "다듬은 말/순화어", 국립국어원[URL]
- "국립문화재연구소"[URL]
- "국사편찬위원회 우리역사넷"[URL]
- "한국미술다국어용어사전"[URL]
- "한국민족문화대백과사전"[URL]
- "大阪市立東洋陶瓷美術館"[URL]
- "Cambridge Dictionary"[URL]
- "Collins English Dictionary"[URL]
- "Encyclopedia Britannica"[URL]
- "Merriam-Webster"[URL]
- "Oxford English Dictionary"[URL]