정부 및 공공기관 연설문 번역의 메타담화분석
Metadiscourse Analysis of Translated Official Speeches
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Translation of official speeches by leaders of the government offices and agencies poses a unique challenge to translator trainers in that they are intended to be spoken and yet written with a high level of formality. The purpose of this study is to find ways to ease the problem by analyzing the differences between English translations (TT) of official speeches written and delivered in Korean (ST) and original English speeches (CT) within the framework of metadiscourse. The analysis found that there are noticeable differences between them in textual organization and use of metadiscourse markers, which makes TTs less audience-friendly and less engaging than CTs. The paper concludes by discussing the feasibility of the pedagogical application of metadiscourse analysis in the translation classrooms.
Abstract
Translation of official speeches by leaders of the government offices and agencies poses a unique challenge to translator trainers in that they are intended to be spoken and yet written with a high level of formality. The purpose of this study is to find ways to ease the problem by analyzing the differences between English translations (TT) of official speeches written and delivered in Korean (ST) and original English speeches (CT) within the framework of metadiscourse. The analysis found that there are noticeable differences between them in textual organization and use of metadiscourse markers, which makes TTs less audience-friendly and less engaging than CTs. The paper concludes by discussing the feasibility of the pedagogical application of metadiscourse analysis in the translation classrooms.
참고문헌 (36)
- 고광윤, "한국 신문의 영어 번역에 나타난 번역 보편소의 코퍼스 기반 분석", 비교문화연구, 45, pp.109~143 (2016), 비교문화연구소[DOI]
- 김철규, "코퍼스에 기반한 영국 신문의 논설문과 한국 대학생의 영어 논설문에 사용된 메타담화(metadiscourse) 비교 연구", 담화와 인지, 16(3), pp.65~88 (2009), 담화·인지언어학회[DOI]
- 김한식, "연설체」 표현의 일-한 통역", 통번역학연구, 1, pp.143~159 (1997)
- 김현아, "<주주에게 보내는 편지>의 번역 및 비번역 텍스트의 텍스트 공손성 분석", 통번역학연구, 15, pp.221~249 (2011), 통번역연구소
- 김현아, "번역 및 비번역 <주주에게 보내는 편지>에 구축된 저자와 독자의 상호작용 - 텍스트적 메타담화 분석을 중심으로", 통번역학연구, 16(2), pp.115~137 (2012), 통번역연구소
- 박미정, "BA번역의 언어간섭과 수용성에 대한 일고찰 ― 한일", 일한 연설문번역 비교를 중심으로 ―, 2013, pp.(63), 31~47[DOI]
- 박세리, "통역 교육 텍스트로서 한국어 연설문의 유용성에 관한 고찰 - 어휘적 측면에서의 통역 난이도 가중 요인 분석 -", 통번역학연구, 19(1), pp.81~103 (2015), 통번역연구소[DOI]
- 방교영, "푸틴 대통령 취임사의 시제분석 -언어행위로서의 담화와 번역에 관하여", 통번역학연구, 19(2), pp.67~87 (2015), 통번역연구소[DOI]
- 신진원, "번역을 위한 다시쓰기 대상으로서의 메타담화: 전문 번역과 학생 번역과의 차이에 관한 사례연구", 번역학연구, 16(2), pp.63~85 (2015), 한국번역학회[DOI]
- 최문선, "통역 교육에서 출발텍스트 선정과난이도 고려에 대한 소고", 통역과 번역, 15(2), pp.249~278 (2013), 한국통역번역학회
- 최희경, "코퍼스를 활용한 번역 연구 - 국내외 연구 동향과 과제 -", 번역학연구, 16(2), pp.317~338 (2015), 한국번역학회[DOI]
- Aguilar, Marta, "Metadiscourse in Academic Speech: A Relevance-Theoretic Approach" (2008), Peter Lang
- Bateson, Gregory, "Steps to an Ecology of Mind" (1973), Chandler P
- Biber, Douglas, "Corpus Linguistics: Investigating Language Structure and Use" (1998), Cambridge U. P
- Cheng, Xiaoguang, "Metadiscourse: A Technique for Improving Student Writing", Research in the Teaching of English, 30(2), pp.149~181 (1996)
- Crismore, Avon, "Talking with Readers: Metadiscourse as Rhetorical Act" (1989), Peter Lang
- Crismore, Avon, "Metadiscourse in Persuasive Writing: A Study of Texts Written by American and Finnish University Students", Written Communication, 10(1), pp.39~71 (1993)
- Goffman, Erving, "Frame Analysis" (1974), Harper and Row
- Gregory, Michael, "Aspects of Varieties Differentiation", Journal of Linguistics, 3, pp.177~198 (1967)
- Halliday, Michael A. K, "Explorations in the Functions of Language" (1973), Continuum
- Hinds, John, "Writing across Languages: Analysis of L2 Texts", pp.141~152 (1987), Addison-Wesley
- House, Julian, "Translation Quality Assessment: A Model Revisited" (1997), Gunter Narr
- Hunston, Susan, "Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse" (2000), Oxford U. P
- Hyland, Ken, "Bringing in the Reader: Addresses Features in Academic Articles", Written Communication, 18(4), pp.549~574 (2001)
- Hyland, Ken, "Metadiscourse" (2005), Continuum
- Hyland, Ken, "Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing" (2018), Bloomsbury Academic
- Hyland, Ken, "Metadiscourse in Academic Writing: A Reappraisal", Applied Linguistics, 25(2), pp.156~177 (2004)
- Ilie, Cornelia, "Discourse and Metadiscourse in Parliamentary Debates", Journal of Language and Politics, 2(1), pp.71~92 (2003)
- Kim, Jin-wan, "Rhetorical Functions of Metadiscourse in EFL Writing", English Teaching, 54(4), pp.3~24 (1999)
- 김찬희, "Epistemic Rhetorical Stance: Hedges and Boosters in L1 and L2 Students’ English Writing", 언어학, 22(2), pp.61~93 (2014), 대한언어학회[DOI]
- 임현우, "Oral Metadiscourse in English Debates: A Discourse-Analytical and Rhetorical Approach", 응용언어학, 25(3), pp.337~363 (2009), 한국응용언어학회
- Martin, James R, "The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English" (2005), Palgrave
- Munday, Jeremy, "Introducing Translation Studies" (2016), Routledge
- Vande Kopple, William, "Exploratory Discourse on Metadiscourse", National Council of Teachers of English, 36(1), pp.82~93 (1985)
- Vande Kopple, William, "The Importance of Studying Metadiscourse", Applied Research in English, 1(2), pp.37~44 (2012)
- Williams, Joseph, "Style: Ten Lessons in Clarity and Grace" (1981), Scott Foresman
