Comparison of two fracture toughness testing methods using a glass-infiltrated and a zirconia dental ceramic
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
PURPOSE. The objective of this study was to compare the fracture toughness (KIc) obtained from the single edge V-notched beam (SEVNB) and the fractographic analysis (FTA) of a glass-infiltrated and a zirconia ceramic. MATERIALS AND METHODS. For each material, ten bar-shaped specimens were prepared for the SEVNB method (3 mm × 4 mm × 25 mm) and the FTA method (2 mm × 4 mm × 25 mm). The starter V-notch was prepared as the fracture initiating flaw for the SEVNB method. A Vickers indentation load of 49 N was used to create a controlled surface flaw on each FTA specimen. All specimens were loaded to fracture using a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5-1 mm/min. The independent-samples t-test was used for the statistical analysis of the KIc values at α=0.05. RESULTS. The mean KIc of zirconia ceramic obtained from SEVNB method (5.4 ± 1.6 MPa·m1/2) was comparable to that obtained from FTA method (6.3 ± 1.6 MPa·m1/2). The mean KIc of glass-infiltrated ceramic obtained from SEVNB method (4.1 ± 0.6 MPa·m1/2) was significantly lower than that obtained from FTA method (5.1 ± 0.7 MPa·m1/2). CONCLUSION. The mean KIc of the glass-infiltrated and zirconia ceramics obtained from the SEVNB method were lower than those obtained from FTA method even they were not significantly different for the zirconia material. The differences in the KIc values could be a result of the differences in the characteristics of fracture initiating flaws of these two methods.
Abstract
PURPOSE. The objective of this study was to compare the fracture toughness (KIc) obtained from the single edge V-notched beam (SEVNB) and the fractographic analysis (FTA) of a glass-infiltrated and a zirconia ceramic. MATERIALS AND METHODS. For each material, ten bar-shaped specimens were prepared for the SEVNB method (3 mm × 4 mm × 25 mm) and the FTA method (2 mm × 4 mm × 25 mm). The starter V-notch was prepared as the fracture initiating flaw for the SEVNB method. A Vickers indentation load of 49 N was used to create a controlled surface flaw on each FTA specimen. All specimens were loaded to fracture using a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5-1 mm/min. The independent-samples t-test was used for the statistical analysis of the KIc values at α=0.05. RESULTS. The mean KIc of zirconia ceramic obtained from SEVNB method (5.4 ± 1.6 MPa·m1/2) was comparable to that obtained from FTA method (6.3 ± 1.6 MPa·m1/2). The mean KIc of glass-infiltrated ceramic obtained from SEVNB method (4.1 ± 0.6 MPa·m1/2) was significantly lower than that obtained from FTA method (5.1 ± 0.7 MPa·m1/2). CONCLUSION. The mean KIc of the glass-infiltrated and zirconia ceramics obtained from the SEVNB method were lower than those obtained from FTA method even they were not significantly different for the zirconia material. The differences in the KIc values could be a result of the differences in the characteristics of fracture initiating flaws of these two methods.
참고문헌 (36)
- Conrad HJ, "Current ceramic materials and systems with clinical recommendations: a systematic review", J Prosthet Dent, 98, pp.389~404 (2007)
- Kelly JR, "Failure of all-ceramic fixed partial dentures in vitro and in vivo: analysis and modeling", J Dent Res, 74, pp.1253~1258 (1995)
- Scherrer SS, "Comparison of three fracture toughness testing techniques using a dental glass and a dental ceramic", Dent Mater, 14, pp.246~255 (1998)
- Piconi C, "Zirconia as a ceramic biomaterial", Biomaterial, 20, pp.1~2 (1999)
- Yilmaz H, "Flexural strength and fracture toughness of dental core ceramics", J Prosthet Dent, 98, pp.120~128 (2007)
- Guazzato M, "Mechanical properties of In-Ceram Alumina and In-Ceram Zirconia", Int J Prosthodont, 15, pp.339~346 (2002)
- Premwara Triwatana, "Clinical performance and failures of zirconia-based fixed partial dentures: a review literature", The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics, 4(2), pp.76~83 (2012), 대한치과보철학회
- Quinn JB, "Influence of microstructure and chemistry on the fracture toughness of dental ceramics", Dent Mater, 19, pp.603~611 (2003)
- Fischer H, "Influence of preparation of ceramic SEVNB specimens on fracture toughness testing results", Dent Mater, 24, pp.618~622 (2008)
- Gogotsi GA, "Fracture toughness of ceramics and ceramic composites", Ceram Int, 29, pp.777~784 (2003)
- Morrell R, "Fracture toughness testing for advanced technical ceramics: internationally agreed good practice", Adv Appl Ceram, 105, pp.88~98 (2006)
- International organization for standard, "ISO", FDIS 6872 Dentistry - Ceramic materials, 2007
- Fracture toughness of ceramics using the SEVNB method; Round-Robin, "Kubler JJ", EMPA, Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Testing and Research, ~, pp.VAMAS Report No. 37 (1999)
- Kubler JJ, "(Fracture toughness of ceramics using the SEVNB method: from a preliminary study to a standard test method, In Fracture resistance testing of monolithic and composite brittle materials", pp.93~106 (2002), ASTM
- Scherrer SS, "Fracture toughness (KIc) of a dental porcelain determined by fractographic analysis", Dent Mater, 15, pp.342~348 (1999)
- Mecholsky JJ Jr, "Fractography: determining the sites of fracture initiation", Dent Mater, 11, pp.113~116 (1995)
- Taskonak B, "Fracture surface analysis of clinically failed fixed partial dentures", J Dent Res, 85, pp.277~281 (2006)
- Oh WS, "Fracture toughness (KIC) of a hot-pressed core ceramic based on fractographic analysis of fractured ceramic FPDs", Int J Prosthodont, 16, pp.135~140 (2003)
- Scherrer SS, "Failure analysis of ceramic clinical cases using qualitative fractography", Int J Prosthodont, 19, pp.185~192 (2006)
- ASTM, "C1322-05a. Standard practice for fractography and characterization of fracture origins in advanced ceramics", American Society for Testing and Materials, ~ (2005)
- Irwin GR, "Crack-extension force for a part-through crack in a plate", J Appl Mech, 29, pp.651~ (1962)
- Taskonak B, "Fractographic analyses of zirconia-based fixed partial dentures", Dent Mater, 24, pp.1077~1082 (2008)
- Scherrer SS, "Fractographic failure analysis of a Procera AllCeram crown using stereo and scanning electron microscopy", Dent Mater, 24, pp.110713~ (2008)
- Quinn JB, "Fractographic analyses of three ceramic whole crown restoration failures", Dent Mater, 21, pp.920~929 (2005)
- Scherrer SS, "Fractographic ceramic failure analysis using the replica technique", Dent Mater, 23, pp.1397~1404 (2007)
- Aboushelib MN, "Bridging the gap between clinical failure and laboratory fracture strength tests using a fractographic approach", Dent Mater, 25, pp.383~391 (2009)
- Thompson JY, "Fracture surface characterization of clinically failed all-ceramic crowns", J Dent Res, 73, pp.1824~1832 (1994)
- Wang H, "Fracture toughness comparison of three test methods with four dental porcelains", Dent Mater, 23, pp.905~910 (2007)
- Anstis GR, "A critical evaluation of indentation techniques for measuring fracture toughness", J Am Ceram Soc, 64, pp.533~538
- Chantikul P, "A critical evaluation of indentation techniques for measuring toughness", J Am Ceram Soc, 64, pp.53943~ (1981)
- Munz D, "Effect of specimen type on the measured values of the fracture toughness of brittle ceramics", pp.1~26 (1983), Plenum press
- Fracture toughness of advanced ceramics by the surface crack in flexure (SCF) method: a VAMAS round robin, "Quinn GD", ~, pp.VAMAS Report No. 17 (1994)
- Nishida T, "Effect of notch-root radius on the fracture toughness of a fine-grained alumina", J Am Ceram Soc, 77, pp.606~608 (1994), EMPA-Dübendorf
- Damani RJ, "Polished Notch modification of SENB-S Fracture Toughness Testing", J Eur Ceram Soc, 17, pp.1685~1689 (1997)
- Fischer H, "Fracture toughness of dental ceramics", Dent Mater, 18, pp.12~19 (2002)
- Kübler J, "Fracture toughness of ceramics using the SEVNB method", Ceram Eng Sci Proc, 18, pp.155~162 (1997)