본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Evaluation of different approaches for using a laser scanner in digitization of dental impressions

2

조회

0

다운로드

6

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

PURPOSE. This study aimed to investigate the potential clinical application of digitized silicone rubber impressions by comparing the accuracy of zirconia 3-unit fixed partial dentures (FPDs) fabricated from 2 types of data (working model and impression) obtained from a laser scanner. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Ten working models and impressions were prepared with epoxy resin and vinyl polysiloxane, respectively. Based on the data obtained from the laser scanner (D-700; 3Shape A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark), a total of 20 zirconia frameworks were prepared using a dental CAD/CAM system (DentalDesigner; 3shape A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark / Ener-mill, Dentaim, Seoul, Korea). The silicone replicas were sectioned into four pieces to evaluate the framework fit. The replicas were imaged using a digital microscope, and the fit of the reference points (P1, P2, P3, P4, P5, P6, and P7) were measured using the program in the device. Measured discrepancies were divided into 5 categories of gaps (MG, CG, AWG, AOTG, OG). Data were analyzed with Student’ t-test (α=0.05), repeated measures ANOVA and twoway ANOVA (α=0.05). RESULTS. The mean gap of the zirconia framework prepared from the working models presented a narrower discrepancy than the frameworks fabricated from the impression bodies. The mean of the total gap in premolars (P=.003) and molars (P=.002) exhibited a statistical difference between two groups. CONCLUSION. The mean gap dimensions of each category showed statistically significant difference. Nonetheless, the digitized impression bodies obtained with a laser scanner were applicable to clinical settings, considering the clinically acceptable marginal fit (120 μm).

Abstract

PURPOSE. This study aimed to investigate the potential clinical application of digitized silicone rubber impressions by comparing the accuracy of zirconia 3-unit fixed partial dentures (FPDs) fabricated from 2 types of data (working model and impression) obtained from a laser scanner. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Ten working models and impressions were prepared with epoxy resin and vinyl polysiloxane, respectively. Based on the data obtained from the laser scanner (D-700; 3Shape A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark), a total of 20 zirconia frameworks were prepared using a dental CAD/CAM system (DentalDesigner; 3shape A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark / Ener-mill, Dentaim, Seoul, Korea). The silicone replicas were sectioned into four pieces to evaluate the framework fit. The replicas were imaged using a digital microscope, and the fit of the reference points (P1, P2, P3, P4, P5, P6, and P7) were measured using the program in the device. Measured discrepancies were divided into 5 categories of gaps (MG, CG, AWG, AOTG, OG). Data were analyzed with Student’ t-test (α=0.05), repeated measures ANOVA and twoway ANOVA (α=0.05). RESULTS. The mean gap of the zirconia framework prepared from the working models presented a narrower discrepancy than the frameworks fabricated from the impression bodies. The mean of the total gap in premolars (P=.003) and molars (P=.002) exhibited a statistical difference between two groups. CONCLUSION. The mean gap dimensions of each category showed statistically significant difference. Nonetheless, the digitized impression bodies obtained with a laser scanner were applicable to clinical settings, considering the clinically acceptable marginal fit (120 μm).

참고문헌 (36)

  1. Miyazaki T., "A review of dental CAD", CAM : current status and future perspectives from 20 years of experience, 2009, pp.28, 44~56
  2. Birnbaum NS., "Dental impressions using 3D digital scanners: virtual becomes reality", Compend Contin Educ Dent, 29, pp.494~505 (2008)
  3. Ender A., "Chairside multi-unit restoration of a quadrant using the new Cerec 3D software", Int J Comput Dent, 6, pp.89~94 (2003)
  4. Christensen GJ., "In-office CAD", CAM milling of restorations : the future?, 2008, pp.139, 83~85
  5. Kurbad A., "The optical conditioning of Cerec preparations with scan spray", Int J Comput Dent, 3, pp.269~279 (2000)
  6. Luthardt RG., "Accuracy of intraoral data acquisition in comparison to the conventional impression", Int J Comput Dent, 8, pp.283~294 (2005)
  7. Persson AS., "Digitization of simulated clinical dental impressions : virtual three-dimensional analysis of exactness", Dent Mater, 25, pp.929~936 (2009)
  8. Holmes JR., "Considerations in measurement of marginal fit", J Prosthet Dent, 62, pp.405~408 (1989)
  9. Grenade C., "Fit of single tooth zirconia copings : comparison between various manufacturing processes", J Prosthet Dent, 105, pp.249~255 (2011)
  10. Martínez-Rus F., "Evaluation of the absolute marginal discrepancy of zirconia-based ceramic copings", J Prosthet Dent, 105, pp.108~114 (2011)
  11. Baig MR., "Evaluation of the marginal fit of a zirconia ceramic computer-aided machined(CAM)crown system", J Prosthet Dent, 104, pp.216~227 (2010)
  12. Att W., "Marginal adaptation of three different zirconium dioxide three-unit fixed dental prostheses", J Prosthet Dent, 101, pp.239~247 (2009)
  13. Tao J., "Fit of metal ceramic crowns cast in Au-1. 6 wt% Ti alloy for different abutment finish line curvature", Dent Mater, 22, pp.397~404 (2006)
  14. 여인성, "In vitro marginal fit of three all-ceramic crown systems", JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 90(5), pp.459~464 (2003), MOSBY-ELSEVIER
  15. Akbar JH., "Marginal adaptation of Cerec 3 CAD", CAM composite crowns using two different finish line preparation designs, 2006, pp.15, 155~163
  16. Kohorst P., "Marginal accuracy of four-unit zirconia fixed dental prostheses fabricated using different computer-aided design", computer-aided manufacturing systems, 2009, pp.117, 319~325
  17. Reich S., "Clinical fit of fourunit zirconia posterior fixed dental prostheses", Eur J Oral Sci, 116, pp.579~584 (2008)
  18. Reich S., "Clinical fit of all-ceramic three-unit fixed partial dentures, generated with three different CAD", CAM systems, 2005, pp.113, 174~179
  19. Wettstein F., "Clinical study of the internal gaps of zirconia and metal frameworks for fixed partial dentures", Eur J Oral Sci, 116, pp.272~279 (2008)
  20. Boening KW., "Clinical fit of Procera AllCeram crowns", J Prosthet Dent, 84, pp.419~424 (2000)
  21. Tinschert J., "Marginal fit of alumina-and zirconia-based fixed partial dentures produced by a CAD", CAM system, 2001, pp.26, 367~374
  22. Coli P., "Fit of a new pressure-sintered zirconium dioxide coping", Int J Prosthodont, 17, pp.59~64 (2004)
  23. Beuer F., "Marginal and internal fits of fixed dental prostheses zirconia retainers", Dent Mater, 25, pp.94~102 (2009)
  24. Beuer F., "Precision of fit : zirconia three-unit fixed dental prostheses", Clin Oral Investig, 13, pp.343~349 (2009)
  25. Bindl A., "Fit of all-ceramic posterior fixed partial denture frameworks in vitro", Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 27, pp.567~575 (2007)
  26. Gonzalo E., "Marginal fit of Zirconia posterior fixed partial dentures", Int J Prosthodont, 21, pp.398~399 (2008)
  27. Coli P., "Precision of a CAD", CAM technique for the production of zirconium dioxide copings, 2004, pp.17, 577~580
  28. McLean JW., "The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique", Br Dent J, 131, pp.107~111 (1971)
  29. Bindl A., "Marginal and internal fit of all-ceramic CAD", CAM crown-copings on chamfer preparations, 2005, pp.32, 441~447
  30. Moldovan O., "Threedimensional fit of CAD", CAM-made zirconia copings, 2011, pp.27, 1273~1278
  31. Borba M., "Adaptation of all-ceramic fixed partial dentures", Dent Mater, 27, pp.1119~1126 (2011)
  32. Dittmer MP., "Stresses and distortions within zirconia-fixed dental prostheses due to the veneering process", Acta Biomater, 5, pp.3231~3239 (2009)
  33. Pfeiffer J., "Dental CAD", CAM technologies : the optical impression(II), 1999, pp.2, 65~72
  34. Feng HY., "Analysis of digitizing errors of a laser scanning system", Precis Eng, 25, pp.185~191 (2001)
  35. DeLong R., "Factors influencing optical 3D scanning of vinyl polysiloxane impression materials", J Prosthodont, 10, pp.78~85 (2001)
  36. Rudolph H., "Computer-aided analysis of the influence of digitizing and surfacing on the accuracy in dental CAD", CAM technology, 2007, pp.37, 579~587

관련 논문AI추천

In-vitro evaluation of marginal and internal fit of 3-unit monolithic zirconia restorations fabricated using digital scanning technologiesÇise Özal, Mutahhar Ulusoy대한치과보철학회 · The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics2021 · 제13권 제6호Evaluation of marginal adaptation in three-unit frameworks fabricated with conventional and powder-freedigital impression techniquesAyşegül Güleryüz Gürbulak, Hasan Kocaağaoğlu, Haydar Albayrak, Sezgi Cinel Sahin대한치과보철학회 · The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics2019 · 제11권 제5호Comparison of the marginal fit of milled yttrium stabilized zirconium dioxide crowns obtained by scanning silicone impressions and by scanning stone replicasAntonio Minarro Alonso, Estefania Aranda Yus, Josep Maria Anglada Cantarell대한치과보철학회 · The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics2018 · 제10권 제3호White light scanner-based repeatability of 3-dimensional digitizing of silicon rubber abutment teeth impressions김웅철, 김지환, 김혜영, 이경탁, 전진훈대한치과보철학회 · The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics2013 · 제5권 제4호Comparison of intraoral scanning and conventional impression techniques using 3-dimensional superimposition박찬진, 이예규, 조리라, 허윤혁대한치과보철학회 · The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics2015 · 제7권 제6호Evaluation of marginal and internal gap of three-unit metal framework according to subtractive manufacturing and additive manufacturing of CAD/CAM systems김동연, 김어빈, 김웅철, 김지환, 김혜영대한치과보철학회 · The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics2017 · 제9권 제6호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)