본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Evaluation of marginal adaptation in three-unit frameworks fabricated with conventional and powder-freedigital impression techniques

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

PURPOSE. The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the marginal misfits of three-unit frameworks fabricated with conventional and digital impressions techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Thirty brass canine and second premolar abutment preparations were fabricated by using a computer numerical control machine and were randomly divided into 3 groups (n=10) as follows: conventional impression group (Group Ci), Cerec Omnicam (Group Cdi), and 3shape TRIOS-3 (Group Tdi) digital impression groups. The laser-sintered metal frameworks were designed and fabricated with conventional and digital impressions. The marginal adaptation was assessed with a stereomicroscope at ×30 magnification. The data were analyzed with 1-way analysis of variances (ANOVAs) and the independent simple t tests. RESULTS. A statistically significant difference was found between the frameworks fabricated by conventional methods and those fabricated by digital impression methods. Multiple comparison results revealed that the frameworks in Group Ci (average, 98.8 ± 16.43 μm; canine, 93.59 ± 16.82 μm; premolar, 104.10 ± 15.02 μm) had larger marginal misfit values than those in Group Cdi (average, 63.78 ± 14.05 μm; canine, 62.73 ± 13.71 μm; premolar, 64.84 ± 15.06 μm) and Group Tdi (average, 65.14 ± 18.05 μm; canine, 70.64 ± 19.02 μm; premolar, 59.64 ± 16.10 μm) (P=.000 for average; P=.001 for canine; P<.001 for premolar). No statistical difference was found between the marginal misfits of canine and premolar abutment teeth within the same groups (P>.05). CONCLUSION. The three-unit frameworks fabricated with digital impression techniques showed better marginal fit compared to conventional impression techniques. All marginal misfit values were clinically acceptable.

Abstract

PURPOSE. The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the marginal misfits of three-unit frameworks fabricated with conventional and digital impressions techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Thirty brass canine and second premolar abutment preparations were fabricated by using a computer numerical control machine and were randomly divided into 3 groups (n=10) as follows: conventional impression group (Group Ci), Cerec Omnicam (Group Cdi), and 3shape TRIOS-3 (Group Tdi) digital impression groups. The laser-sintered metal frameworks were designed and fabricated with conventional and digital impressions. The marginal adaptation was assessed with a stereomicroscope at ×30 magnification. The data were analyzed with 1-way analysis of variances (ANOVAs) and the independent simple t tests. RESULTS. A statistically significant difference was found between the frameworks fabricated by conventional methods and those fabricated by digital impression methods. Multiple comparison results revealed that the frameworks in Group Ci (average, 98.8 ± 16.43 μm; canine, 93.59 ± 16.82 μm; premolar, 104.10 ± 15.02 μm) had larger marginal misfit values than those in Group Cdi (average, 63.78 ± 14.05 μm; canine, 62.73 ± 13.71 μm; premolar, 64.84 ± 15.06 μm) and Group Tdi (average, 65.14 ± 18.05 μm; canine, 70.64 ± 19.02 μm; premolar, 59.64 ± 16.10 μm) (P=.000 for average; P=.001 for canine; P<.001 for premolar). No statistical difference was found between the marginal misfits of canine and premolar abutment teeth within the same groups (P>.05). CONCLUSION. The three-unit frameworks fabricated with digital impression techniques showed better marginal fit compared to conventional impression techniques. All marginal misfit values were clinically acceptable.

참고문헌 (43)

  1. Walton TR, "The up to 25-year survival and clinical performance of 2, 340 high gold-based metal-ceramic single crowns", Int J Prosthodont, 26, pp.151~160 (2013)
  2. An S, "Evaluating the marginal fit of zirconia copings with digital impressions with an intraoral digital scanner", J Prosthet Dent, 112, pp.1171~1175 (2014)
  3. Vennerstrom M, "The fit of crowns produced using digital impression systems", Swed Dent J, 38, pp.101~110 (2014)
  4. Şeker E, "Evaluation of marginal fit of CAD", CAM restorations fabricated through cone beam computerized tomography and laboratory scanner data, 2016, pp.115, 47~51
  5. Borba M, "Adaptation of all-ceramic fixed partial dentures", Dent Mater, 27, pp.1119~1126 (2011)
  6. Punj A, "Dental Impression Materials and Techniques", Dent Clin North Am, 61, pp.779~796 (2017)
  7. Euán R, "Marginal adaptation of zirconium dioxide copings : influence of the CAD", CAM system and the finish line design, 2014, pp.112, 155~162
  8. Dahl BE, "Digital evaluation of marginal and internal fit of single-crown fixed dental prostheses", Eur J Oral Sci, 126, pp.512~517 (2018)
  9. Praça L, "Accuracy of single crowns fabricated from ultrasound digital impressions", Dent Mater, 34, pp.e280~e288 (2018)
  10. Anadioti E, "Internal fit of pressed and computeraided design", computer-aided manufacturing ceramic crowns made from digital and conventional impressions, 2015, pp.113, 304~309
  11. Ahlholm P, "Digital versus conventional impressions in fixed prosthodontics:A review", J Prosthodont, 27, pp.35~41 (2018)
  12. Gabor AG, "Digital Dentistry-Digital Impression and CAD", CAM system applications, 2017, pp.2, 54~57
  13. Ng J, "A comparison of the marginal fit of crowns fabricated with digital and conventional methods", J Prosthet Dent, 112, pp.555~560 (2014)
  14. Anadioti E, "3D and 2D marginal fit of pressed and CAD", CAM lithium disilicate crowns made from digital and conventional impressions, 2014, pp.23, 610~617
  15. Abdel-Azim T, "Comparison of the marginal fit of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated with CAD", CAM technology by using conventional impressions and two intraoral digital scanners, 2015, pp.114, 554~559
  16. Schaefer O, "Impact of digital impression techniques on the adaption of ceramic partial crowns in vitro", J Dent, 42, pp.677~683 (2014)
  17. Vandeweghe S, "Accuracy of digital impressions of multiple dental implants : an in vitro study", Clin Oral Implants Res, 28, pp.648~653 (2017)
  18. Su TS, "Comparison of marginal and internal fit of 3-unit ceramic fixed dental prostheses made with either a conventional or digital impression", J Prosthet Dent, 116, pp.362~367 (2016)
  19. Renne W, "Evaluation of the marginal fit of CAD", CAM crowns fabricated using two different chairside CAD, J Esthet Restor Dent, pp.2015, 27[DOI]
  20. Haddadi Y, "Accuracy of crowns based on digital intraoral scanning compared to conventional impression-a split-mouth randomised clinical study", Clin Oral Investig, 23, pp.4043~4050 (2019)
  21. Takeuchi Y, "Use of digital impression systems with intraoral scanners for fabricating restorations and fixed dental prostheses", J Oral Sci, 60, pp.1~7 (2018)
  22. Nesse H, "Internal and marginal fit of cobalt-chromium fixed dental prostheses fabricated with 3 different techniques", J Prosthet Dent, 114, pp.686~692 (2015)
  23. Dikbas I, "Evaluation of reasons for extraction of crowned teeth : a prospective study at a university clinic", Acta Odontol Scand, 71, pp.848~856 (2013)
  24. McLean JW, "The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique", Br Dent J, 131, pp.107~111 (1971)
  25. Ucar Y, "Internal fit evaluation of crowns prepared using a new dental crown fabrication technique : laser-sintered Co-Cr crowns", J Prosthet Dent, 102, pp.253~259 (2009)
  26. Sakrana AA, "In vitro evaluation of the marginal and internal discrepancies of different esthetic restorations", J Appl Oral Sci, 21, pp.575~580 (2013)
  27. Ortega R, "Marginal and internal discrepancies of posterior zirconia-based crowns fabricated with three different CAD", CAM systems versus metal-ceramic, 2015, pp.28, 509~511
  28. Zoellner A, "Correlation between clinical scoring of secondary caries at crown margins and histologically assessed extent of the lesions", Int J Prosthodont, 13, pp.453~459 (2000)
  29. Keul C, "Fit of 4-unit FDPs made of zirconia and CoCr-alloy after chairside and labside digitalization-a laboratory study", Dent Mater, 30, pp.400~407 (2014)
  30. Kocaağaoğlu H, "In vitro evaluation of marginal, axial, and occlusal discrepancies in metal ceramic restorations produced with new technologies", J Prosthet Dent, 116, pp.368~374 (2016)
  31. Afify A, "Marginal discrepancy of noble metal-ceramic fixed dental prosthesis frameworks fabricated by conventional and digital technologies", J Prosthet Dent, 119, pp.307.e1~307.e7 (2018)
  32. Svanborg P, "Marginal and internal fit of cobalt-chromium fixed dental prostheses generated from digital and conventional impressions", Int J Dent, 2014, pp.534382~ (2014)
  33. Eroğlu Z, "Fatigue behavior of zirconia-ceramic, galvano-ceramic, and porcelain-fused-to-metal fixed partial dentures", J Prosthodont, 22, pp.516~522 (2013)
  34. "Material Data Sheet EOS CobaltChrome SP2 material for EOSINT M 270. No., 2009"[URL]
  35. Memarian M, "Marginal adaptation and internal fit of posterior 3-unit zirconia FPDs fabricated with different CAD", CAM systems, 2017, pp.25, 79~85
  36. Dureja I, "A comparative evaluation of vertical marginal fit of provisional crowns fabricated by computer-aided design", computer-aided manufacturing technique and direct(intraoral technique)and flexural strength of the materials : An in vitro study, 2018, pp.18, 314~320
  37. Örtorp A, "The fit of cobalt-chromium three-unit fixed dental prostheses fabricated with four different techniques : a comparative in vitro study", Dent Mater, 27, pp.356~363 (2011)
  38. Boitelle P, "A systematic review of CAD", CAM fit restoration evaluations, 2014, pp.41, 853~874
  39. Colpani JT, "Evaluation of marginal and internal fit of ceramic crown copings", Dent Mater, 29, pp.174~180 (2013)
  40. Kenyon BJ, "Dimensional accuracy of 7 die materials", J Prosthodont, 14, pp.25~31 (2005)
  41. Corso M, "The effect of temperature changes on the dimensional stability of polyvinyl siloxane and polyether impression materials", J Prosthet Dent, 79, pp.626~631 (1998)
  42. Xu D, "The marginal fit of selective laser melting-fabricated metal crowns : an in vitro study", J Prosthet Dent, 112, pp.1437~1440 (2014)
  43. Wankhade S, "A comparative evaluation of six commonly used types of die materials for the property of abrasion resistance, at two time intervals : an in vitro study", Int J Prosthodont Restor Dent, 3, pp.1~6 (2013)

관련 논문AI추천

Evaluation of marginal discrepancy in metal frameworks fabricated by sintering-based computer-aided manufacturing methodsÇağri Ural, Necati Kaleli, Yeşim Ölçer Us대한치과보철학회 · The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics2020 · 제12권 제3호Evaluation of marginal and internal gaps in single and three-unit metal frameworks made by micro-stereolithography김동연, 김웅철, 김지환, 김혜영, 이하나대한치과보철학회 · The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics2017 · 제9권 제4호In-vitro evaluation of marginal and internal fit of 3-unit monolithic zirconia restorations fabricated using digital scanning technologiesÇise Özal, Mutahhar Ulusoy대한치과보철학회 · The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics2021 · 제13권 제6호Evaluation of marginal and internal gap of three-unit metal framework according to subtractive manufacturing and additive manufacturing of CAD/CAM systems김동연, 김어빈, 김웅철, 김지환, 김혜영대한치과보철학회 · The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics2017 · 제9권 제6호Evaluation of different approaches for using a laser scanner in digitization of dental impressions김욱태, 김웅철, 김지환, 김혜영, 이완선대한치과보철학회 · The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics2014 · 제6권 제1호Marginal fit of anterior 3-unit fixed partial zirconia restorations using different CAD/CAM systems권택가, 김성훈, 송태진, 양재호, 여인성, 이재봉, 한중석대한치과보철학회 · The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics2013 · 제5권 제3호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)