The effects of different polishing techniques on the staining resistance of CAD/CAM resin-ceramics
2
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
PURPOSE. The purposes of this study were to evaluate the staining resistance of CAD/CAM resin-ceramics polished with different techniques and to determine the effectiveness of the polishing techniques on resinceramics, comparing it with that of a glazed glass-ceramic. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Four different CAD/CAM ceramics (feldspathic ceramic: C-CEREC Blocs, (SIRONA) and three resin-ceramics: L-Lava Ultimate, (3M ESPE), E-Enamic, (VITA) and CS-CeraSmart, (GC)) and one light cure composite resin: ME-Clearfil Majesty Esthetic (Kuraray) were used. Only C samples were glazed (gl). Other restorations were divided into four groups according to the polishing technique: nonpolished control group (c), a group polished with light cure liquid polish (Biscover LV BISCO) (bb), a group polished with ceramic polishing kit (Diapol, EVE) (cd), and a group polished with composite polishing kit (Clearfil Twist Dia, Kuraray) (kc). Glazed C samples and the polished samples were further divided into four subgroups and immersed into different solutions: distilled water, tea, coffee, and fermented black carrot juice. Eight samples (8 × 8 × 1 mm) were prepared for each subgroup. According to CIELab system, four color measurements were made: before immersion, immersion after 1 day, after 1 week, and after 1 month. Data were analyzed with repeated measures of ANOVA (α=.05). RESULTS. The highest staining resistance was found in gl samples. There was no difference among gl, kc and cd (P>.05). Staining resistance of gl was significantly higher than that of bb (P<.05). Staining resistances of E and CS were significantly higher than those of L and ME (P<.05). CONCLUSION. Ceramic and composite polishing kits can be used for resin ceramics as a counterpart of glazing procedure used for full ceramic materials. Liquid polish has limited indications for resin ceramics.
Abstract
PURPOSE. The purposes of this study were to evaluate the staining resistance of CAD/CAM resin-ceramics polished with different techniques and to determine the effectiveness of the polishing techniques on resinceramics, comparing it with that of a glazed glass-ceramic. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Four different CAD/CAM ceramics (feldspathic ceramic: C-CEREC Blocs, (SIRONA) and three resin-ceramics: L-Lava Ultimate, (3M ESPE), E-Enamic, (VITA) and CS-CeraSmart, (GC)) and one light cure composite resin: ME-Clearfil Majesty Esthetic (Kuraray) were used. Only C samples were glazed (gl). Other restorations were divided into four groups according to the polishing technique: nonpolished control group (c), a group polished with light cure liquid polish (Biscover LV BISCO) (bb), a group polished with ceramic polishing kit (Diapol, EVE) (cd), and a group polished with composite polishing kit (Clearfil Twist Dia, Kuraray) (kc). Glazed C samples and the polished samples were further divided into four subgroups and immersed into different solutions: distilled water, tea, coffee, and fermented black carrot juice. Eight samples (8 × 8 × 1 mm) were prepared for each subgroup. According to CIELab system, four color measurements were made: before immersion, immersion after 1 day, after 1 week, and after 1 month. Data were analyzed with repeated measures of ANOVA (α=.05). RESULTS. The highest staining resistance was found in gl samples. There was no difference among gl, kc and cd (P>.05). Staining resistance of gl was significantly higher than that of bb (P<.05). Staining resistances of E and CS were significantly higher than those of L and ME (P<.05). CONCLUSION. Ceramic and composite polishing kits can be used for resin ceramics as a counterpart of glazing procedure used for full ceramic materials. Liquid polish has limited indications for resin ceramics.
참고문헌 (28)
- Davidowitz G, "The use of CAD", CAM in dentistry, 2011, pp.55, 559~570
- El Zohairy AA, "Microtensile bond strength testing of luting cements to prefabricated CAD", CAM ceramic and composite blocks, 2003, pp.19, 575~583
- 오선희, "Effect of abutment shade, ceramic thickness, and coping type on the final shade of zirconia all-ceramic restorations: in vitro study of color masking ability", The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics, 7(5), pp.368~374 (2015), 대한치과보철학회[DOI]
- 이완선, "The effect of powder A2", powder A3 mixing ratio on color and translucency parameters of dental porcelain, 2015, pp.7(5), 400~405[DOI]
- Attia A, "Influence of cyclic loading and luting agents on the fracture load of two all-ceramic crown systems", J Prosthet Dent, 92, pp.551~556 (2004)
- Dalpino PH, "Fracture resistance of teeth directly and indirectly restored with composite resin and indirectly restored with ceramic materials", Am J Dent, 15, pp.389~394 (2002)
- El-Damanhoury HM, "Fracture resistance and microleakage of endocrowns utilizing three CADCAM blocks", Oper Dent, 40, pp.201~210 (2015)
- Acar O, "Color stainability of CAD", CAM and nanocomposite resin materials, 2016, pp.115, 71~75
- Dietschi D, "Comparison of the color stability of ten new-generation composites: an in vitro study", Dent Mater, 10, pp.353~362 (1994)
- Imirzalioglu P, "Color stability of denture acrylic resins and a soft lining material against tea, coffee, and nicotine", J Prosthodont, 19, pp.118~124 (2010)
- Preis V, "The effectiveness of polishing kits: influence on surface roughness of zirconia", Int J Prosthodont, 28, pp.149~151 (2015)
- Steiner R, "Adjusting dental ceramics: An in vitro evaluation of the ability of various ceramic polishing kits to mimic glazed dental ceramic surface", J Prosthet Dent, 113, pp.616~622 (2015)
- Sarikaya I, "Effects of different polishing techniques on the surface roughness of dental porcelains", J Appl Oral Sci, 18, pp.10~16 (2010)
- Motro PF, "Effects of different surface treatments on stainability of ceramics", J Prosthet Dent, 108, pp.231~237 (2012)
- Fasbinder DJ, "Surface evaluation of polishing techniques for new resilient CAD", CAM restorative materials, 2016, pp.28, 56~66
- Raimondo RL Jr, "Polished versus autoglazed dental porcelain", J Prosthet Dent, 64, pp.553~557 (1990)
- Fuzzi M, "Scanning electron microscopy and profilometer evaluation of glazed and polished dental porcelain", Int J Prosthodont, 9, pp.452~458 (1996)
- Yilmaz C, "Color stability of glazed and polished dental porcelains", J Prosthodont, 17, pp.20~24 (2008)
- Esquivel JF, "Color stability of low-fusing porcelains for titanium", Int J Prosthodont, 8, pp.479~485 (1995)
- Lawson NC, "Gloss and stain resistance of ceramic-polymer CAD", CAM restorative blocks, 2016, pp.28, S40~S45
- Acar O, "Color stainability of CAD", CAM and nanocomposite resin materials, 2016, pp.115, 71~75
- Stawarczyk B, "Evaluation of mechanical and optical behavior of current esthetic dental restorative CAD", CAM composites, 2015, pp.55, 1~11
- Stawarczyk B, "Discoloration of manually fabricated resins and industrially fabricated CAD", CAM blocks versus glass-ce-ramic: effect of storage media, duration, and subsequent polishing, 2012, pp.31, 377~383
- Robinson FG, "Effect of 10 percent carbamide peroxide on color of provisional restoration materials", J Am Dent Assoc, 128, pp.727~731 (1997)
- Patel SB, "The effect of surface finishing and storage solutions on the color stability of resin-based composites", J Am Dent Assoc, 135, pp.587~594 (2004)
- Gajewski VE, "Monomers used in resin composites: degree of conversion, mechanical properties and water sorption", solubility, 2012, pp.23, 508~514
- Khokhar ZA, "Color stability of restorative resins", Quintessence Int, 22, pp.733~737 (1991)
- Gawriołek M, "Color and luminescence stability of selected dental materials in vitro", J Prosthodont, 21, pp.112~122 (2012)