Comparison of the bond strength of ceramics to Co-Cr alloys made by casting and selective laser melting
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
PURPOSE. Considering the importance of metal-ceramic bond, the present study aimed to compare the bond strength of ceramics to cobalt-chrome (Co-Cr) alloys made by casting and selective laser melting (SLM). MATERIALS AND METHODS. In this in-vitro experimental study, two sample groups were prepared, with one group comprising of 10 Co-Cr metal frameworks fabricated by SLM method and the other of 10 Co-Cr metal frameworks fabricated by lost wax cast method with the dimensions of 0.5 × 3 × 25 mm (following ISO standard 9693). Porcelain with the thickness of 1.1 mm was applied on a 3 × 8-mm central rectangular area of each sample. Afterwards, bond strengths of the samples were assessed with a Universal Testing Machine. Statistical analysis was performed with Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and T-test. RESULTS. Bond strength in the conventionally cast group equaled 74.94 ± 16.06 MPa, while in SLM group, it equaled 69.02 ± 5.77 MPa. The difference was not statistically significant (P ≤ .05). CONCLUSION. The results indicated that the bond strengths between ceramic and Co-Cr alloys made by casting and SLM methods were not statistically different.
Abstract
PURPOSE. Considering the importance of metal-ceramic bond, the present study aimed to compare the bond strength of ceramics to cobalt-chrome (Co-Cr) alloys made by casting and selective laser melting (SLM). MATERIALS AND METHODS. In this in-vitro experimental study, two sample groups were prepared, with one group comprising of 10 Co-Cr metal frameworks fabricated by SLM method and the other of 10 Co-Cr metal frameworks fabricated by lost wax cast method with the dimensions of 0.5 × 3 × 25 mm (following ISO standard 9693). Porcelain with the thickness of 1.1 mm was applied on a 3 × 8-mm central rectangular area of each sample. Afterwards, bond strengths of the samples were assessed with a Universal Testing Machine. Statistical analysis was performed with Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and T-test. RESULTS. Bond strength in the conventionally cast group equaled 74.94 ± 16.06 MPa, while in SLM group, it equaled 69.02 ± 5.77 MPa. The difference was not statistically significant (P ≤ .05). CONCLUSION. The results indicated that the bond strengths between ceramic and Co-Cr alloys made by casting and SLM methods were not statistically different.
참고문헌 (21)
- Ferrari M, "Fracture resistance of three porcelainlayered CAD", CAM zirconia frame designs, 2014, pp.30, e163~e168
- Anusavice KJ, "Standardizing failure, success, and survival decisions in clinical studies of ceramic and metal-ceramic fixed dental prostheses", Dent Mater, 28, pp.102~111 (2012)
- Gupta A, "A comparison of fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with bonded partial restorations and full-coverage porcelain-fused-to-metal crowns", Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 34, pp.405~411 (2014)
- Reitemeier B, "Metalceramic failure in noble metal crowns: 7-year results of a prospective clinical trial in private practices", Int J Prosthodont, 19, pp.397~399 (2006)
- Atluri KR, "Comparative evaluation of metal-ceramic bond strengths of nickel chromium and cobalt chromium alloys on repeated castings: An in vitro study", J Int Oral Health, 6, pp.99~103 (2014)
- Patel KA, "A comparative evaluation of bond strength of feldspathic porcelain to nickel-chromium alloy, when subjected to various surface treatments: An in vitro study", J Indian Prosthodont Soc, 15, pp.53~57 (2015)
- Lee BA, "Effect of surface treatment on bond strength of Ti-10Ta-10Nb to low-fusing porcelain", J Prosthet Dent, 109, pp.95~105 (2013)
- Girish PV, "Comparison of shear bond strength of metal brackets bonded to porcelain surface using different surface conditioning methods: an in vitro study", J Contemp Dent Pract, 13, pp.487~493 (2012)
- Sadeq A, "Effects of interfacial variables on ceramic adherence to cast and machined commercially pure titanium", J Prosthet Dent, 90, pp.10~17 (2003)
- Tholey MJ, "SEM observations of porcelain Y-TZP interface", Dent Mater, 25, pp.857~862 (2009)
- Benetti P, "Evaluation of thermal compatibility between core and veneer dental ceramics using shear bond strength test and contact angle measurement", Dent Mater, 26, pp.743~750 (2010)
- Hammad IA, "Designs of bond strength tests for metal-ceramic complexes: review of the literature", J Prosthet Dent, 75, pp.602~608 (1996)
- Xiang N, "Metal-ceramic bond strength of Co-Cr alloy fabricated by selective laser melting", J Dent, 40, pp.453~457 (2012)
- Akova T, "Comparison of the bond strength of laser-sintered and cast base metal dental alloys to porcelain", Dent Mater, 24, pp.1400~1404 (2008)
- Wu L, "Evaluation of the mechanical properties and porcelain bond strength of cobalt-chromium dental alloy fabricated by selective laser melting", J Prosthet Dent, 111, pp.51~55 (2014)
- Taufall S, "Fracture load and failure types of different veneered polyetheretherketone fixed dental prostheses", Clin Oral Investig, 20, pp.2493~2500 (2016)
- Tan JP, "The use of slow heating and slow cooling regimens to strengthen porcelain fused to zirconia", J Prosthet Dent, 107, pp.163~169 (2012)
- Kannari Y, "Analysis of fracture surface of titanium-porcelain bonding by electron spectroscopy for chemical analysis", Dent Mater J, 33, pp.689~695 (2014)
- Cai Z, "Porcelain adherence to dental cast CP titanium: effects of surface modifications", Biomaterials, 22, pp.979~986 (2001)
- Kajima Y, "Fatigue strength of Co-Cr-Mo alloy clasps prepared by selective laser melting", J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 59, pp.446~458 (2016)
- 배은정, "Bond and fracture strength of metalceramic restorations formed by selective laser sintering", The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics, 6(4), pp.266~271 (2014), 대한치과보철학회[DOI]