Comparison of retentive forces of temporary cements and abutment height used with implant-supported prostheses
2
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM: Recent data regarding the effects the cement type and abutment heights on the retentive force of a prosthetic crown are inconsistent and unable to suggest clinical guidelines. PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: This study evaluated the effects of different types of temporary cements and abutment heights on the retentive strength of cement-retained implant-supported prostheses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prefabricated implant abutments, 4 mm in diameter, 8taper per side, and light chamfer margins, were used. The abutment heights of the implants were 4 mm, 5.5 mm and 7 mm. Seven specimens of a single crown similar to a first premolar were fabricated. Six commercially available temporary cements, TempBond, TempBond NE, Cavitec, Procem, Dycal, and IRM, were used in this study. Twenty-four hours after cementation, the retentive strengths were measured using a universal testing machine with a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. The cementation procedures were repeated 3 times. The data was analyzed using two-way analysis of variance and a Tukey test (α=0.05). RESULTS: The tensile bond strength ranged from 1.76 kg to 19.98 kg. The lowest tensile strengths were similar in the TempBond and Cavitec agents. Dycal showed the highest tensile bond strength (P<0.01). More force was required to remove the crowns cemented to the long abutments (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: TempBond and Cavitec agents showed the lowest mean tensile bond strength. The Dycal agent showed more than double the tensile bond strength of the TempBond agent.
Abstract
STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM: Recent data regarding the effects the cement type and abutment heights on the retentive force of a prosthetic crown are inconsistent and unable to suggest clinical guidelines. PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: This study evaluated the effects of different types of temporary cements and abutment heights on the retentive strength of cement-retained implant-supported prostheses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prefabricated implant abutments, 4 mm in diameter, 8taper per side, and light chamfer margins, were used. The abutment heights of the implants were 4 mm, 5.5 mm and 7 mm. Seven specimens of a single crown similar to a first premolar were fabricated. Six commercially available temporary cements, TempBond, TempBond NE, Cavitec, Procem, Dycal, and IRM, were used in this study. Twenty-four hours after cementation, the retentive strengths were measured using a universal testing machine with a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. The cementation procedures were repeated 3 times. The data was analyzed using two-way analysis of variance and a Tukey test (α=0.05). RESULTS: The tensile bond strength ranged from 1.76 kg to 19.98 kg. The lowest tensile strengths were similar in the TempBond and Cavitec agents. Dycal showed the highest tensile bond strength (P<0.01). More force was required to remove the crowns cemented to the long abutments (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: TempBond and Cavitec agents showed the lowest mean tensile bond strength. The Dycal agent showed more than double the tensile bond strength of the TempBond agent.
참고문헌 (26)
- Misch CE, "Screw-retained versus cement-retained implant-supported prostheses", Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent, 7, pp.15~8 (1995)
- Chee W, "Cemented versus screw-retained implant prostheses: which is better?", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 14, pp.137~141 (1999)
- Clayton GH, "The effect of luting agents on the retention and marginal adaptation of the CeraOne implant system", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 12, pp.660~665 (1997)
- Pauletto N, "Complications associated with excess cement around crowns on osseointegrated implants: a clinical report", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 14, pp.865~868 (1999)
- Ramp MH, "Tensile bond strengths of provisional luting agents used with an implant system", J Prosthet Dent, 81, pp.510~514 (1999)
- Breeding LC, "Use of luting agents with an implant system: Part I", J Prosthet Dent, 68, pp.737~741 (1992)
- Voitik AJ, "The Kulzer abutment luting; Kal technique. A direct assembly framework method for osseointegrated implant prostheses", Implant Soc, 2, pp.11~14 (1991)
- Michalakis KX, "Cement failure loads of 4 provisional luting agents used for the cementation of implant-supported fixed partial dentures", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 15, pp.545~549 (2000)
- Akashia AE, "Effects of different types of temporary cements on the tensile strength and marginal adaptation of crowns on implants", J Adhes Dent, 2, pp.309~315 (2002)
- Bernal G, "The effects of abutment taper, length and cement type on resistance to dislodgement of cement-retained, implant-supported restorations", J Prosthodont, 12, pp.111~115 (2003)
- Crim GA, "Comparison of four thermocycling techniques", J Prosthet Dent, 53, pp.50~53 (1985)
- Covey DA, "Effects of abutment size and luting cement type on the uniaxial retention force of implant-supported crowns", J Prosthet Dent, 83, pp.344~348 (2000)
- Squier RS, "Retentiveness of dental cements used with metallic implant components", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 16, pp.793~798 (2001)
- Akca K, "Comparison of uniaxial resistance forces of cements used with implant- supported crowns", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 17, pp.536~542 (2002)
- Kent DK, "Retention of cemented implant-supported restorations", J Prosthodont, 6, pp.193~196 (1997)
- Schneider RL, "Evaluation of the retention of castings to endosseous dental implants", J Prosthet Dent, 58, pp.73~78 (1987)
- Lee HY, "In vitro study of the tensile bond strength of cement-retained single implant prosthesis by the various provisional luting cements and the surface treatment of abutments", J Korean Acad Prosthodont, 40, pp.296~305 (2002)
- Maxwell AW, "Effect of crown preparation height on the retention and resistance of gold castings", Gen Dent, 38, pp.200~202 (1990)
- Koka S, "The effect of cementing agent and technique on the retention of a CeraOne gold cylinder: a pilot study", Implant Dent, 4, pp.32~35 (1995)
- Mansour A, "Comparative evaluation of casting retention using the ITI solid abutment with six cements", Clin Oral Implants Res, 13, pp.343~348 (2002)
- Dixon DL, "Use of luting agents with an implant system: Part II", J Prosthet Dent, 68, pp.885~890 (1992)
- Mathews MF, "The effect of connector design on cement retention in an implant and natural tooth-supported fixed partial denture", J Prosthet Dent, 65, pp.822~827 (1991)
- Goodacre CJ, "Clinical complications of osseointegrated implants", J Prosthet Dent, 81, pp.537~552 (1999)
- Becker W, "Replacement of maxillary and mandibular molars with single endosseous implant restorations: a retrospective study", J Prosthet Dent, 74, pp.51~55 (1995)
- Singer A, "Cement-retained implant-supported fixed partial dentures: a 6-month to 3-year followup", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 11, pp.645~649 (1996)
- Baldissara P, "Comparative study of the marginal microleakage of six cements in fixed provisional crowns", J Prosthet Dent, 80, pp.417~422 (1998)