본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Hydroxyapatite-coated implant: Clinical prognosis assessment via a retrospective follow-up study for the average of 3 years

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

PURPOSE. This research evaluated clinical outcomes of two types of hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated implants: OT (Osstem TS III-HA, Osstem implant Co., Busan, Korea) and ZM (Zimmer TSV-HA, Zimmer dental, Carlsbad, USA). MATERIALS AND METHODS. The research was conducted on 303 implants (89 of OT, 214 of ZM), which were placed from January 16, 2010 to December 20, 2012. The prognosis was evaluated in terms of success rates, survival rates, annual marginal bone loss, and implant stability quotients (ISQ). The samples were classified into immediate, early, conventional, and delayed groups according to the loading time. RESULTS. Overall, there were no significant differences between OT and ZM in success rates, survival rates, and annual marginal bone loss, except for the result of secondary stability. OT showed 77.83 ± 8.23 ISQ, which was marginally higher than 76.09 ± 6.90 ISQ of ZM (P<.05). In terms of healing periods, only immediate loading showed statistically significant differences (P<.05). Differences between OT and ZM were observed in terms of two indices, the annual marginal bone loss (0.17 ± 0.58 mm/year < 0.45 ± 0.80 mm/year) and secondary stability (84.36 ± 3.80 ISQ > 82.48 ± 3.69 ISQ) (P<.05). OT and ZM did not have any statistically significant differences in early, conventional, and delayed loading (P>.05). CONCLUSION. OT (97.75%) and ZM (98.50%) showed relatively good outcomes in terms of survival rates. In general, OT and ZM did not show statistically significant differences in most indices (P>.05), although OT performed marginally better than ZM in the immediate loading and 1-stage surgery (P<.05).

Abstract

PURPOSE. This research evaluated clinical outcomes of two types of hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated implants: OT (Osstem TS III-HA, Osstem implant Co., Busan, Korea) and ZM (Zimmer TSV-HA, Zimmer dental, Carlsbad, USA). MATERIALS AND METHODS. The research was conducted on 303 implants (89 of OT, 214 of ZM), which were placed from January 16, 2010 to December 20, 2012. The prognosis was evaluated in terms of success rates, survival rates, annual marginal bone loss, and implant stability quotients (ISQ). The samples were classified into immediate, early, conventional, and delayed groups according to the loading time. RESULTS. Overall, there were no significant differences between OT and ZM in success rates, survival rates, and annual marginal bone loss, except for the result of secondary stability. OT showed 77.83 ± 8.23 ISQ, which was marginally higher than 76.09 ± 6.90 ISQ of ZM (P<.05). In terms of healing periods, only immediate loading showed statistically significant differences (P<.05). Differences between OT and ZM were observed in terms of two indices, the annual marginal bone loss (0.17 ± 0.58 mm/year < 0.45 ± 0.80 mm/year) and secondary stability (84.36 ± 3.80 ISQ > 82.48 ± 3.69 ISQ) (P<.05). OT and ZM did not have any statistically significant differences in early, conventional, and delayed loading (P>.05). CONCLUSION. OT (97.75%) and ZM (98.50%) showed relatively good outcomes in terms of survival rates. In general, OT and ZM did not show statistically significant differences in most indices (P>.05), although OT performed marginally better than ZM in the immediate loading and 1-stage surgery (P<.05).

참고문헌 (24)

  1. Adell R, "A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw", Int J Oral Surg, 10, pp.387~416 (1981)[DOI]
  2. de Groot K, "Plasma sprayed coatings of hydroxylapatite", J Biomed Mater Res, 21, pp.1375~1381 (1987)[DOI]
  3. Szmukler-Moncler S, "Considerations preliminary to the application of early and immediate loading protocols in dental implantology", Clin Oral Implants Res, 11, pp.12~25 (2000)[DOI]
  4. Gapski R, "Critical review of immediate implant loading", Clin Oral Implants Res, 14, pp.515~527 (2003)[DOI]
  5. Whitehead RY, "The effect of dissolution on plasma sprayed hydroxylapatite coatings on titanium", Clin Mater, 12, pp.31~39 (1993)[DOI]
  6. Wheeler SL, "Eight-year clinical retrospective study of titanium plasma-sprayed and hydroxyapatite-coated cylinder implants", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 11, pp.340~350 (1996)
  7. Zablotsky MH, "Hydroxyapatite coatings in implant dentistry", Implant Dent, 1, pp.253~257 (1992)[DOI]
  8. Overgaard S, "Role of different loading conditions on resorption of hydroxyapatite coating evaluated by histomorphometric and stereological methods", J Orthop Res, 14, pp.888~894 (1996)[DOI]
  9. Yoshinari M, "Properties of hydroxyapatitecoated Ti-6Al-4V alloy produced by the ion-plating method", Bull Tokyo Dent Coll, 32, pp.147~156 (1991)
  10. Sugiyama T, "Surface observation of thin hydroxyapatite-coated implants at 80 months after insertion", J Oral Implantol, 37, pp.273~278 (2011)[DOI]
  11. Lee JJ, "Survival of hydroxyapatitecoated implants: a meta-analytic review", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 58, pp.1372~1379 (2000)[DOI]
  12. 김상수, "가토의 대퇴골에 식립한 3종류의 수산화인회석 코팅 임플란트에 대한 제거회전력 비교 연구", 대한구강악안면외과학회지, 37(1), pp.49~53 (2011), 대한구강악안면외과학회
  13. 엄태관, "수산화인회석 코팅 임프란트의 골치유과정에 관한 실험적 연구", 대한구강악안면외과학회지, 37(4), pp.295~300 (2011), 대한구강악안면외과학회
  14. Aparicio C, "Immediate", early loading of dental implants: a report from the Sociedad Espanola de Implantes World Congress consensus meeting in Barcelona, Spain, 2002, 2003, pp.5, 57~60
  15. Albrektsson T, "The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 1, pp.11~25 (1986)
  16. Naert I, "Biologic outcome of implant-supported restorations in the treatment of partial edentulism. part I: a longitudinal clinical evaluation", Clin Oral Implants Res, 13, pp.381~389 (2002)[DOI]
  17. O'Roark WL, "Survival rate of dental implants: an individual practitioner's anecdotal review of 25 years of experience", J Oral Implantol, 23, pp.90~103 (1997)
  18. Guttenberg SA, "Longitudinal report on hydroxyapatite-coated implants and advanced surgical techniques in a private practice", Compend, pp.S549~S553 (1993)
  19. Saadoun AP, "An 8-year compilation of clinical results obtained with Steri-Oss endosseous implants", Compend Contin Educ Dent, 17, pp.669~674 (1996)
  20. Jones JD, "A 5-year com-parison of hydroxyapatite-coated titanium plasma-sprayed and titanium plasma-sprayed cylinder dental implants", Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 87, pp.649~652 (1999)[DOI]
  21. 김영균, "Effect of loading time on marginal bone loss around hydroxyapatite-coated implants", 대한구강악안면외과학회지, 39(4), pp.161~167 (2013), 대한구강악안면외과학회
  22. Kim YK, "A randomized controlled clinical trial of two types of tapered implants on immediate loading in the posterior maxilla and mandible", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 28, pp.1602~1611 (2012)
  23. Polizzi G, "Immediate and delayed implant placement into extraction sockets: a 5-year report", Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2, pp.93~99 (2000)[DOI]
  24. Morris HF, "Hydroxyapatite-coated implants: a case for their use", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 56, pp.1303~1311 (1998)[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

Effect of loading time on marginal bone loss around hydroxyapatite-coated implants김민경, 김영균, 배지현, 안교진, 양홍서, 윤필영, 이양진대한구강악안면외과학회 · 대한구강악안면외과학회지2013 · 제39권 제4호Randomized controlled clinical trial of 2 types of hydroxyapatite-coated implants on moderate periodontitis patients김영균, 김현석, 윤필영대한치주과학회 · Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science2016 · 제46권 제5호수산화인회석 코팅 임플란트와 sandblasted, large-grit and acid-etched implant의 안정성에 대한 임상연구김수관, 김승희, 김정선, 박현춘, 오지수, 이성규, 정미애, 정민채치의학연구원 · Oral Biology Research2012 · 제36권 제1호Prospective randomized clinical trial of hydrophilic tapered implant placement at maxillary posterior area: 6 weeks and 12 weeks loading김영균, 김지윤, 윤필영, 이양진, Sang-Yun Kim, Seong-Beom Kim대한치과보철학회 · The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics2016 · 제8권 제5호Long-term evaluation of the prognosis of straight and tapered implant with resorbable blast media surface: Retrospective clinical study김영균, Dong-Woo Kang, Won-Woong Jang치의학연구원 · Oral Biology Research2019 · 제43권 제1호Comparison of sandblasted and acid-etched surface implants and new hydrophilic surface implants in the posterior maxilla using a 3-month early-loading protocol: a randomized controlled trial윤필영, Hyeong Gi Kim, Il-hyung Kim, Young-Kyun Kim대한구강악안면외과학회 · 대한구강악안면외과학회지2021 · 제47권 제3호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)