Influence of the amount of tooth surface preparation on the shear bond strength of zirconia cantilever single-retainer resin-bonded fixed partial denture
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
PURPOSE. Conventional resin-bonded fixed partial dentures (RBFPDs) are usually made with a two-retainer design. Unlike conventional RBFPDs, cantilever resin-bonded fixed partial dentures (Cantilever RBFPDs) are, for their part, made with a single-retainer design. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of tooth surface preparation on the bond strength of zirconia cantilever single-retainer RBFPDs. The objective is to evaluate the shear bond strength of these single-retainer RBFPDs bonded on 3 different amount of tooth surface preparation. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Thirty extracted bovine incisors were categorized to 3 groups (n=10), with different amounts of tooth surface preparations. Teeth were restored with single-retainer RBFPDs with different retainer surfaces: large retainer of 32 mm2; medium retainer of 22 mm2; no retainer and only a proximal connecting box of 12 mm2. All RBFPDs were made of zirconia and were bonded using an adhesive system without adhesive capacity. Shear forces were applied to these restorations until debonding. RESULTS. Mean shear bond strength values for the groups I, II, and II were 2.39±0.53 MPa, 3.13±0.69 MPa, and 5.40±0.96 MPa, respectively. Statistical analyses were performed using a one-way ANOVA test with Bonferroni post-hoc test, at a significance level of 0.001. Failure modes were observed and showed a 100% adhesive fracture. CONCLUSION. It can be concluded that the preparation of large tooth surface preparation might be irrelevant. For zirconia single-retainer RBFPD, only the preparation of a proximal connecting box seems to be a reliable and minimally invasive approach. The differences are statistically significant.
Abstract
PURPOSE. Conventional resin-bonded fixed partial dentures (RBFPDs) are usually made with a two-retainer design. Unlike conventional RBFPDs, cantilever resin-bonded fixed partial dentures (Cantilever RBFPDs) are, for their part, made with a single-retainer design. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of tooth surface preparation on the bond strength of zirconia cantilever single-retainer RBFPDs. The objective is to evaluate the shear bond strength of these single-retainer RBFPDs bonded on 3 different amount of tooth surface preparation. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Thirty extracted bovine incisors were categorized to 3 groups (n=10), with different amounts of tooth surface preparations. Teeth were restored with single-retainer RBFPDs with different retainer surfaces: large retainer of 32 mm2; medium retainer of 22 mm2; no retainer and only a proximal connecting box of 12 mm2. All RBFPDs were made of zirconia and were bonded using an adhesive system without adhesive capacity. Shear forces were applied to these restorations until debonding. RESULTS. Mean shear bond strength values for the groups I, II, and II were 2.39±0.53 MPa, 3.13±0.69 MPa, and 5.40±0.96 MPa, respectively. Statistical analyses were performed using a one-way ANOVA test with Bonferroni post-hoc test, at a significance level of 0.001. Failure modes were observed and showed a 100% adhesive fracture. CONCLUSION. It can be concluded that the preparation of large tooth surface preparation might be irrelevant. For zirconia single-retainer RBFPD, only the preparation of a proximal connecting box seems to be a reliable and minimally invasive approach. The differences are statistically significant.
참고문헌 (13)
- Kern M, "Clinical long-term survival of two-retainer and single-retainer all-ceramic resin-bonded fixed partial dentures", Quintessence Int, 36, pp.141~147 (2005)
- Pjetursson BE, "A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of resin-bonded bridges after an observation period of at least 5 years", Clin Oral Implants Res, 19, pp.131~141 (2008)[DOI]
- Hussey DL, "erformance of 400 adhesive bridges fitted in a restorative dentistry department", J Dent, 19, pp.221~225 (1991)[DOI]
- Durey KA, "esin bonded bridges: techniques for success", Br Dent J, 211, pp.113~118 (2011)[DOI]
- Kern M, "urface conditioning influences zirconia ceramic bonding", J Dent Res, 88, pp.817~822 (2009)[DOI]
- Botelho M, "esign principles for cantilevered resin-bonded fixed partial dentures", Quintessence Int, 31, pp.613~619 (2000)
- Djemal S, "ong-term survival characteristics of 832 resin-retained bridges and splints provided in a post-graduate teaching hospital between 1978 and 1993", J Oral Rehabil, 26, pp.302~320 (1999)[DOI]
- Chan AW, "A prospective study of cantilever resinbonded bridges: an initial report", Aust Dent J, 45, pp.31~36 (2000)[DOI]
- Olin PS, "Clinical evaluation of resinbonded bridges: a retrospective study", Quintessence Int, 22, pp.873~877 (1991)
- Bassi GS, "An in vitro study of dentin exposure during resin-bonded fixed partial denture preparation", Quintessence Int, 35, pp.541~548 (2004)
- Kern M, "Ten-year survival of anterior all-ceramic resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses", J Adhes Dent, 13, pp.407~410 (2011)
- van Dalen A, "A literature review of two-unit cantilevered FPDs", Int J Prosthodont, 17, pp.281~284 (2004)
- Thompson JY, "Adhesion", cementation to zirconia and other non-silicate ceramics: where are we now?, 2011, pp.27, 71~82