본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Evaluation of marginal discrepancy of pressable ceramic veneer fabricated using CAD/CAM system: additive and subtractive manufacturing

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

PURPOSE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the marginal discrepancy of heat-pressed ceramic veneers manufactured using a CAD/CAM system. MATERIALS AND METHODS. The ceramic veneers for the abutment of a maxillary left central incisor were designed using a CAD/CAM software program. Ten veneers using a microstereolithography apparatus (AM group), ten veneers using a five-axis milling machine (SM group), and ten veneers using a traditional free-hand wax technique (TW group) were prepared according to the respective manufacturing method. The ceramic veneers were also fabricated using a heat-press technique, and a silicone replica was used to measure their marginal discrepancy. The marginal discrepancies were measured using a digital microscope (×160 magnification). The data were analyzed using a nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis H test. Finally, post-hoc comparisons were conducted using Bonferroni-corrected Mann-Whitney U tests (α=.05). RESULTS. The mean±D of the total marginal discrepancy was 99.68±28.01 μm for the AM group, 76.60±28.76 μm for the SM group, and 83.08±39.74 μm for the TW group. There were significant differences in the total marginal discrepancies of the ceramic veneers (P<.05). CONCLUSION. The SM group showed a better fit than the AM and TW groups. However, all values were within the clinical tolerance. Therefore, CAD/CAM manufacturing methods can replace the traditional free-hand wax technique.

Abstract

PURPOSE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the marginal discrepancy of heat-pressed ceramic veneers manufactured using a CAD/CAM system. MATERIALS AND METHODS. The ceramic veneers for the abutment of a maxillary left central incisor were designed using a CAD/CAM software program. Ten veneers using a microstereolithography apparatus (AM group), ten veneers using a five-axis milling machine (SM group), and ten veneers using a traditional free-hand wax technique (TW group) were prepared according to the respective manufacturing method. The ceramic veneers were also fabricated using a heat-press technique, and a silicone replica was used to measure their marginal discrepancy. The marginal discrepancies were measured using a digital microscope (×160 magnification). The data were analyzed using a nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis H test. Finally, post-hoc comparisons were conducted using Bonferroni-corrected Mann-Whitney U tests (α=.05). RESULTS. The mean±D of the total marginal discrepancy was 99.68±28.01 μm for the AM group, 76.60±28.76 μm for the SM group, and 83.08±39.74 μm for the TW group. There were significant differences in the total marginal discrepancies of the ceramic veneers (P<.05). CONCLUSION. The SM group showed a better fit than the AM and TW groups. However, all values were within the clinical tolerance. Therefore, CAD/CAM manufacturing methods can replace the traditional free-hand wax technique.

참고문헌 (20)

  1. Marchionatti AME, "Color stability of ceramic laminate veneers cemented with light-polymerizing and dual-polymerizing luting agent: A split-mouth randomized clinical trial", J Prosthet Dent, 118, pp.604~610 (2017)
  2. Peumans M, "A prospective ten-year clinical trial of porcelain veneers", J Adhes Dent, 6, pp.65~76 (2004)
  3. Aboushelib MN, "Internal adaptation, marginal accuracy and microleakage of a pressable versus a machinable ceramic laminate veneers", J Dent, 40, pp.670~677 (2012)[DOI]
  4. Shamseddine L, "Fit of pressed crowns fabricated from two CAD-CAM wax pattern process plans: A comparative in vitro study", J Prosthet Dent, 118, pp.49~54 (2017)[DOI]
  5. Ural C, "In vitro evaluation of marginal adaptation in five ceramic restoration fabricating techniques", Quintessence Int, 41, pp.585~590 (2010)
  6. Homsy FR, "Marginal and internal fit of pressed lithium disilicate inlays fabricated with milling, 3D printing, and conventional technologies", J Prosthet Dent, 119, pp.783~790 (2018)[DOI]
  7. van Noort R, "The future of dental devices is digital", Dent Mater, 28, pp.3~12 (2012)[DOI]
  8. Stampfl J, "Photopolymers with tunable mechanical properties processed by laser-based high-resolu- tion stereolithography", J Micromech Microeng, 18, pp.125014~ (2008)[DOI]
  9. Hamza TA, "Accuracy of ceramic restorations made with two CAD", CAM systems, 2013, pp.109, 83~87
  10. Neves FD, "Micro-computed tomography evaluation of marginal fit of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated by using chairside CAD", CAM systems or the heat-pressing technique, 2014, pp.112, 1134~1140
  11. Lin TM, "Fracture resistance and marginal discrepancy of porcelain laminate veneers influenced by preparation design and restorative material in vitro", J Dent, 40, pp.202~209 (2012)[DOI]
  12. 박진영, "Evaluation of the marginal and internal gaps of three different dental prostheses: comparison of the silicone replica technique and three-dimensional superimposition analysis", The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics, 9(3), pp.159~169 (2017), 대한치과보철학회[DOI]
  13. Kim DY, "Reproducibility of different arrangement of resin copings by dental microste- reolithography: Evaluating the marginal discrepancy of resin copings", J Prosthet Dent, 117, pp.260~265 (2017)[DOI]
  14. Sakornwimon N, "Clinical marginal fit of zirconia crowns and patients' preferences for impression techniques using intraoral digital scanner versus polyvinyl siloxane material", J Prosthet Dent, 118, pp.386~391 (2017)[DOI]
  15. ADA Specification No. 8 for zinc phosphate cement. Guide to dental materials and devices, "ANSI", Association AD
  16. Sulaiman F, "A comparison of the marginal fit of In-Ceram, IPS Empress, and Procera crowns", Int J Prosthodont, 10, pp.478~484 (1997)
  17. McLean JW, "The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique", Br Dent J, 131, pp.107~111 (1971)[DOI]
  18. Vojdani M, "Comparison the Marginal and Internal Fit of Metal Copings Cast from Wax Patterns Fabricated by CAD", CAM and Conventional Wax up Techniques, 2013, pp.14, 118~129
  19. Abduo J, "Trends in computer-aided manufacturing in prosthodontics: a review of the available streams", Int J Dent, 2014, pp.783948~ (2014)
  20. Al-Imam H, "Accuracy of stereolithography additive casts used in a digital workflow", J Prosthet Dent, 119, pp.580~585 (2018)[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

The effect of various veneering techniques on the marginal fit of zirconia copingsKianoosh Torabi, Mahroo Vojdani, Masumeh Taghva, Rashin Giti, Soheil Pardis대한치과보철학회 · The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics2015 · 제7권 제3호Comparison of the fit accuracy of zirconia-based prostheses generated by two CAD/CAM systems조진현, 하석준대한치과보철학회 · The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics2016 · 제8권 제6호Influence of porcelain veneering on the marginal fit of Digident and Lava CAD/CAM zirconia ceramic crowns김성훈, 박현순, 양재호, 이재봉, 한중석대한치과보철학회 · The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics2010 · 제2권 제2호Evaluation of marginal fit of 2 CAD-CAM anatomic contour zirconia crown systems and lithium disilicate glass-ceramic crown박상원, 박지희, 오계정, 윤귀덕, 임현필, 지민경대한치과보철학회 · The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics2015 · 제7권 제4호Evaluation of marginal discrepancy in metal frameworks fabricated by sintering-based computer-aided manufacturing methodsÇağri Ural, Necati Kaleli, Yeşim Ölçer Us대한치과보철학회 · The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics2020 · 제12권 제3호Evaluation of marginal and internal gap of three-unit metal framework according to subtractive manufacturing and additive manufacturing of CAD/CAM systems김동연, 김어빈, 김웅철, 김지환, 김혜영대한치과보철학회 · The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics2017 · 제9권 제6호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)